Sort reaction of buckwheat to complex application of biological preparations and fertilizers
Abstract
Buckwheat is a valuable food crop. However, its low yield in comparison with other cereal crops leads to high prices for the cereal realization of this crop. Therefore, the development of techniques for increasing the buckwheat yield is relevant. One way to increase the buckwheat yield is to optimize the nutrition regime of the crop through the use of biologicals, macro- and microfertilizers.
The researches devoted to the study of the complex application of biologicals and mineral fertilizers were being conducted during 2016‒2018 at the Institute of Agriculture of the North-East of the National Academy of Agrarian Sciences.
The weather conditions of the growing seasons varied significantly over the years of research, which made it possible to study more fully the response of varieties to the factors studied.
The studies were conducted in a three-factor field experiment where:
- factor A ‒ the varieties of different morphotype;
- factor B ‒ doses of mineral fertilizers (without fertilizers; N30P45K45; N30P45K45+N15; N16P16K16 in the rows; N16P16K16+N15)
- factor C ‒ biological preparation Microgumine ‒ 200 g/ha; microfertilizer Reakom "Zernovyi" 0,5 l/ha; growth regulator Sodium humate ‒ 1.0 l/ha.
According to the results of our research, it was found that Selianochka variety was better than Slobozhanka variety by responding to the use of seed inoculation and application of chelated fertilizer forms, with a yield increase of 0.05‒0.27 t/ha. With the increase of mineral nutrition, the yield increase was 0.01 t/ha less than in the Slobozhanka variety, namely from 0.06 to 0.45 t/ha.
By Selyanochka variety, the variant with complex use of seed treatment with biological preparation, microfertilizers and application of growth regulator in the phase of "budding" of buckwheat plants, on the background of the use of mineral fertilizers at the rate of N16P16K16 + N15 the maximum yield of 2.20 t/ha was obtained. However, the yield increase after fertilizer application was 0.42 t/ha, from the use of biological products, microfertilizers and growth regulator ‒ 0.27 t/ha.
In Slobozhanka variety, inoculation of seeds and application of chelated forms of fertilizers in the budding phase of plants also favoured to increase the yield, but not in all variants. On the other hand, the increase from the use of mineral fertilizers in all variants was positive from 0.04 to 0.41 t/ha.
The comparison of the studied varieties of different morphotypes by yield showed that in Selyanochka variety it was of the average 1.96 t/ha during the research years, at fluctuations from 1.75 to 2.20 t/ha, by Slobozhanka variety ‒ 1.73 t/ha and 1.51‒1.92 t/ha respectively.
Buckwheat is a valuable food crop. However, its low yield in comparison with other cereal crops leads to high prices for the cereal realization of this crop. Therefore, the development of techniques for increasing the buckwheat yield is relevant. One way to increase the buckwheat yield is to optimize the nutrition regime of the crop through the use of biologicals, macro- and microfertilizers.
The researches devoted to the study of the complex application of biologicals and mineral fertilizers were being conducted during 2016‒2018 at the Institute of Agriculture of the North-East of the National Academy of Agrarian Sciences.
The weather conditions of the growing seasons varied significantly over the years of research, which made it possible to study more fully the response of varieties to the factors studied.
The studies were conducted in a three-factor field experiment where:
- factor A ‒ the varieties of different morphotype;
- factor B ‒ doses of mineral fertilizers (without fertilizers; N30P45K45; N30P45K45+N15; N16P16K16 in the rows; N16P16K16+N15)
- factor C ‒ biological preparation Microgumine ‒ 200 g/ha; microfertilizer Reakom "Zernovyi" 0,5 l/ha; growth regulator Sodium humate ‒ 1.0 l/ha.
According to the results of our research, it was found that Selianochka variety was better than Slobozhanka variety by responding to the use of seed inoculation and application of chelated fertilizer forms, with a yield increase of 0.05‒0.27 t/ha. With the increase of mineral nutrition, the yield increase was 0.01 t/ha less than in the Slobozhanka variety, namely from 0.06 to 0.45 t/ha.
By Selyanochka variety, the variant with complex use of seed treatment with biological preparation, microfertilizers and application of growth regulator in the phase of "budding" of buckwheat plants, on the background of the use of mineral fertilizers at the rate of N16P16K16 + N15 the maximum yield of 2.20 t/ha was obtained. However, the yield increase after fertilizer application was 0.42 t/ha, from the use of biological products, microfertilizers and growth regulator ‒ 0.27 t/ha.
In Slobozhanka variety, inoculation of seeds and application of chelated forms of fertilizers in the budding phase of plants also favoured to increase the yield, but not in all variants. On the other hand, the increase from the use of mineral fertilizers in all variants was positive from 0.04 to 0.41 t/ha.
The comparison of the studied varieties of different morphotypes by yield showed that in Selyanochka variety it was of the average 1.96 t/ha during the research years, at fluctuations from 1.75 to 2.20 t/ha, by Slobozhanka variety ‒ 1.73 t/ha and 1.51‒1.92 t/ha respectively.
References
2. Gavriljanchik, R. Ju. (2001). Produktivnіst' grechki zalezhno vіd poperednikіv ta bakterіal'nih dobriv [Buckwheat productivity depending on predecessors and bacterial fertilizers]. Zb. nauk. pr. Podіl's'koї derzhavnoї agrarno-tehnіchnoї akademії. Abetka, Kam’janec'-Podіl's'kij, 9, 140‒142.
3. Volkogon, V. V. (2006). Mіkrobnі preparati jak faktor pіdvishhennja zasvojuvanostі roslinami mіneral'nih dobriv [Microbial preparations as a factor in increasing the digestibility of mineral fertilizers by plants]. Sіl's'kogospodars'ka mіkrobіologіja. Mіzhvіd. temat. nauk. zb., Chernіgіv, 4, 21‒30.
4. Alekseeva, E. S., Kvashhuk, S. V., & Voroneckij, S. I. (1992). Biogumus pod grechihu [Biohumus under buckwheat]. Tez. dokl. II Mezhdun. Kongressa “Biokonversija organicheskih othodov narodnogo hazjajstva i ohrana okruzhajushhej sredy, Ivano-Frankovsk, 67.
5. Sharafetdinov, U. I. (2003). Vlijanie biologicheskih preparatov na urozhajnost' i kachestvo zerna jarovoj pshenicy v uslovijah Volgo-Vjatskogo regiona [The influence of biological products on the yield and quality of spring wheat grain in the conditions of the Volga-Vyatka region]. Avtoreferat dis. na soisk. uch. step. kand. s.-h. nauk: 06.01.09 «Rastenievodstvo». Nizhnij Novgorod.
6. Shevchenko, A. O. & Tarasenko, V. O. (1998). Reguljatori rostu. Principovo novij visokoefektivnij element sіl's'kogospodars'kih tehnologіj [Growth regulators. A fundamentally new high-performance element of agricultural technology]. Zahist roslin, 1,17–19.
7. Shkurihina, A. K. & Girfanov, V. K. (1971). Formirovanie urozhaja i mineral'noe pitanie rastenij [The harvesting and mineral nutrition of plants]. Trudy Instituta biologii, Ufa, 228.
8. Nichiporovich, A. A. (1956). Fotosintez i teorija poluchenija vysokih urozhaev [Photosynthesis and the theory of high yields]. Izd-vo AN SSSR, Moskva.
9. Fedorova, N. A., Kornіjchuk, M. S., & Kamіns'kij, V. F. (2001). Metodichnі vkazіvki shhodo provedennja pol'ovih doslіdzhen' і vivchennja tehnologії viroshhuvannja zernovih kul'tur [Guidance on conducting field research and the study of technology growing crops]. NNC «Іnstitut zemlerobstva» NAAN, Chabani. 4–18.
10. Dospehov, B. A. (1985). Metodika polevogo opyta [The field experience technique]. Kolos, Moskva, 42–117.
11. Tkachik, S. O. (2016). Metodika provedennja ekspertizi sortіv roslin grupi zernovih, krup’janih ta zernobobovih na pridatnіst' do poshirennja v Ukraїnі [Methodology for the examination of plant varieties of the group of cereals, cereals and legumes for suitability for distribution in Ukraine]. Ukraїns'kij іnstitut ekspertizi sortіv roslin, Vіnnicja, 4–14.
ISSN 
ISSN 
