Use of fungicides on potato plants

V.I. Dubovyk; О.О. Dubovyk; I.M. Kovalenko; L.V. Kruchko; V.M. Kovalenko; M.V. Dubovyk

doi:10.32782/agrobio.2020.1.4

V.I. Dubovyk Sumy National Agrarian University (Sumy, Ukraine) https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2880-7047
О.О. Dubovyk
I.M. Kovalenko Sumy National Agrarian University (Sumy, Ukraine) https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4957-2352
L.V. Kruchko Sumy National Agrarian University (Sumy, Ukraine)
V.M. Kovalenko Sumy National Agrarian University (Sumy, Ukraine) https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9830-3370
M.V. Dubovyk Sumy National Agrarian University (Sumy, Ukraine)

DOI: https://doi.org/10.32782/agrobio.2020.1.4

Keywords: fungicide, potato, active substance, consumption rate, chemical group

Abstract

Potato production in Ukraine is concentrated in the private sector, where it is grown without crop rotation. This leads to the accumulation of infection in the soil and the deterioration of the phytosanitary condition of potato plantings. As a result, the degeneration of potatoes is accelerating. The State Register of Pesticides and Agrochemicals Permitted for Use in Ukraine registers a large number of fungicides that are permitted for use on potatoes. Among almost 90 drugs, 1/3 are simple fungicides, and 2/3 are complex drugs that have a longer spectrum of action and longer effect. All drugs are divided into three main groups of origin: biological (cydox O, pseudobacterin-2), inorganic (blue burgundy, cuproxate, coside, extra honey), organic (the most common group). The article considers the modern range of fungicides of different chemical groups recommended for use on potato varieties. According to the research results the most common active substances are derivatives of carbomic and dithiocarbamic acids (mancozeb, metyram), other chemical compounds (metalaxyl-M, cymoxanil), morpholines (dimetomorph), strobilurins (azoxystrobin, triamoxalodone) and also it given an assessment of the current range of fungicides recommended for use on potato varieties. Everything is necessary to protect potato varieties from diseases. It is necessary to begin protection with use of the combined disinfectants which provide reliable preservation of sprouts of culture, further contact and combined drugs are used. The first treatment is carried out with combined drugs that quickly penetrate the plant and redistribute in it. All combined drugs are used before flowering, after which the treatment is carried out only with contact drugs. High efficiency is shown by the system of protection according to which use of contact drugs alternates with system-contact in 10 days. One of the factors of significant disease damage to potatoes is also the low level of natural resistance to them. The researchers note that potato plants do not have large resistance genes against Phytophthora infestans and Alternaria solani, so the resistance index is determined by the type of polygenic resistance. Scientists have found that the field resistance of potatoes to disease correlates with late ripening. Therefore, the creation of early-maturing varieties with field resistance is quite problematic. This explains the fact that most varieties of early maturity are much more affected by disease than late varieties.

References

1. Ivanjuk, V. G., Banadysev, S. A., & Zhuromskij, G. K. (2005). Zashhita kartofelja ot boleznej, vreditelej i sornjakov [Protection of potatoes from diseases, pests and weeds]. Belprint, Minsk, 696 (in Russian).
2. Polozhenec', V. M., Nemeryc'ka, L. V., & Zhuravs'ka, I. A. (2012). Fungicydy proty al'ternariozu kartopli [Fungicides against potato Alternaria]. Karantyn i zahyst roslyn, 6, 24–26 (in Ukrainian).
3. Ahatov, A. K. (2013). Bolezni i vrediteli ovoshhnyh kul'tur i kartofelja [Diseases and pests of vegetables and pota-toes]. GUP Moskovskaja typografyja, Moskva, 463 (in Russian).
4. Markov, I. L., & Ruban, M. B. (2014). Dovidnyk iz zahystu pol'ovyh kul'tur vid hvorob ta shkidnykiv [Handbook for the protection of field crops from diseases and pests]. Junivest Media, Kyi'v, 188 (in Ukrainian).
5. Taktajev, B. A., Podberezko, I. M., & Ponomarenko, S. P. (2019). Vplyv elementiv zahystu na riven' urazhenosti sortiv kartopli hvorobamy za znyzhenoi' normy fungicydiv [Influence of protective elements on the level of disease of potato varieties at low rates of fungicides]. Kartopljarstvo Ukrai'ny, 2, 29–37 (in Ukrainian).
6. Ret'man, S. V., Lisovyj, M. P., & Ret'man, M. S. (2013). Rejestracijni vyprobuvannja fungicydiv u sil's'komu gospodarstvi [Registration tests of fungicides in agriculture]. Feniks. Kyi'v, 45–47 (in Ukrainian).
7. Mel'nychuk, F. S., Ret'man, M. S., & Lepeshkin, I. V. (2014). Mehanizmy fungicydnogo zahystu [Mechanisms of fungicidal protection]. Feniks. Kyi'v, 66–67 (in Ukrainian).
8. Derzhavnyj rejestr pestycydiv i agrohimikativ, dozvolenyh do vykorystannja v Ukrai'ni 2008-2020. [State Register of Pesticides and Agrochemicals Permitted for Use in Ukraine 2008-2020]. [Electronic resource]. Access mode: URL: https://menr.gov.ua/content/derzhavniy-reestr-pesticidiv-i-agrohimikativ-dozvolenih-do-vikoristannya-v-ukraini-dopovnennya-z-01012017-zgidno-vimog-postanovi-kabinetu-ministriv-ukraini-vid-21112007--1328.html
9. Crop science Ukraine. [Electronic resource]. Access mode: URL: https://www.cropscience.bayer.ua/Products/Fungicides
10. Agroresurs. [Electronic resource]. Access mode: URL: http://www.agro.kr.ua
11. Sammit-Agro Ukraine. [Electronic resource]. Access mode: URL: http://www.summit-agro.com.ua/product/zagalnij-katalog-produktiv/penkoceb-zp
12. Badvasy. [Electronic resource]. Access mode: URL: http://www.badvasy.com.ua/uk/2012-11-17-16-40-47/2012-11-17-16-43-06/2013-04-12-10-17-22.html
13. Katalog zasobiv zahystu roslyn Bayer [Catalog of plant protection products Bayer]. (2019). [Electronic resource]. Access mode: URL: https://www.lnz.com.ua/uploads/zzr-bayer-2019.pdf
14. Golovnyj sajt dlja agronomiv [The main site for agronomists]. [Electronic resource]. Access mode: URL: https://superagronom.com
15. Pesticidy.ru. [Electronic resource]. Access mode: URL: https://www.pesticidy.ru
16. Shyta, O. V. (2019). Zahyst kartopli vid osnovnyh shkidnykiv ta hvorob [Protection of potatoes from major pests and diseases]. Karantyn i zahyst roslyn, 1–2, 18–21 (in Ukrainian).
17. Lazarchuk, L. A. (2015). Efektyvnist' elementiv systemy zahystu kartopli vid hvorob i kolorads'kogo zhuka. [The effectiveness of elements of potato protection systems against diseases and the Colorado potato beetle]. Visnyk ZhNAEU. Roslynnyctvo, selekcija ta nasinnyctvo, 1(47), 174–180 (in Ukrainian).
18. Ret'man, M. S., Mel'nychuk, F. S., Drozd, P. Ju., & Marchenko, O. A. (2015) Fungicydni systemy zahystu kartopli, shho zastosovujut'sja v umovah intensyvnyh agrotehnologij [Fungicide systems of potato protection used in the conditions of intensive agrotechnologies]. Roslynnyctvo ta g'runtoznavstvo, 210, 290–294 (in Ukrainian).
19. Sergijenko, V. (2015). Efektyvnist' fungicydiv proty hvorob kartopli. [Efficacy of fungicides against potato diseases]. Agrobiznes s'ogodni, 15–16. [Electronic resource]. Access mode: URL: http://agro-business.com.ua/agro/item/572-efektyvnist-funhitsydiv-proty-khvorob-kartopli.html
20. Sergijenko, V. (2019) Efektyvnist' fungicydiv proty hvorob kartopli [Efficacy of fungicides against potato diseases]. Propozycija. №5 [Electronic resource]. Access mode: URL: https://propozitsiya.com/ua/efektyvnist-fungicydiv-proty-hvorob-kartopli
21. Bilovus, G. (2017). Fitoftoroz kartopli [Potato late blight]. Visnyk Agroforum, 12(59), 21–23 (in Ukrainian).
22. Fedorchuk, S. V., Polozhenec' V. M., Nemeryc'ka L.V., Zhuravs'ka I. A., & Chajka O. V. (2017). Fungicydna aktyvnist' himichnyh ta biologichnyh preparativ proty Phytophthora infestans ta Alternaria solani kartopli. [Fungicidal activity of chemical and biological preparations against Phytophthora infestans and Alternaria solani potatoes]. Visnyk Harkivs'kogo nacional'nogo agrarnogo universytetu. Serija «Fitopatologija ta entomologija», 1−2, 155–159 (in Ukrainian).
23. Ruzhenkova, O. (2016). Kartopljani vyprobuvannja Agrico and Syngenta. [Potatoes testing Agrico and Syngenta]. Plantator,4, 64–67 (in Ukrainian).
24. Mel'nikova, E. S. (2020). Ispol'zovanie fungicidnyh protravitelej na kartofele v uslovijah Central'nogo Chernozem'ja [The use of fungicidal dressings on potatoes in the conditions of the Central Black Earth Region]. Zashhita kartofelja, 1, 9–10 (in Russian).
25. Bomok, S. K. (2019). Vplyv protrujnykiv ta reguljatoriv rostu na rozvytok al'ternariozu kartopli v umovah Polissja Ukrai'ny. Karantyn i zahyst roslyn, 7–8, 18–22. doi: 10.36495/2312-0614.2019.7-8.18-22
26. Dovgal', M., Choni, S., & Bondar, O. (2016). Selest Top – zbalansovanyj zahyst. [Celest Top - balanced protection]. Propozycija, 2, 118–119 (in Ukrainian).
27. Prosti rishennja dlja zahystu kartopli [Simple solutions for potato protection]. (2020). Adama, 72 (in Ukrainian).
28. Martynenko, V. I. (2016). Fitoftoroz kartopli ta zahody zahystu vid n'ogo u NNVC «Doslidne pole» HNAU im. V. V. Dokuchajeva. [Potato late blight and protection measures against it in NNVC "Experimental field" HNAU. V. V. Dokuchaeva]. Visnyk HNAU. Serija «Fitopatologija ta entomologija», 1–2, 57–62 (in Ukrainian).
29. Taktajev, B. A., Podberezko, I. M., Fedorenko,O. L., & Olijnyk, T. M. (2018). Reakcija sortiv kartopli na elementy tehnologii' kontrolju fitopatogeniv v agrocenozah kul'tury [Reaction of potaro varieties to elements of phytopathogen control technology in agrocenoses of culture]. Karantyn i zahyst roslyn, 9–10, 9–17 (in Ukrainian).
30. Taktajev, B. A., Podberezko, I. M., & Fedorenko, O. L. (2018). Reakcija sortiv kartopli [Reaction of varieties]. Karantyn i zahyst roslyn,10, 9–16 (in Ukrainian).