WATER CONSUMPTION OF SPRING BARLEY PLANTS DEPENDS ON FERTILIZER AND PREDECESSOR

Keywords: spring barley, water consumption coefficient, mineral fertilizers, predecessor, productivity, productive moisture, soil

Abstract

On the basis of the research carried out in the period 2018-2020 in the conditions of the Right Bank Forest Steppe of Ukraine, it was established that the lowest coefficient of water consumption of barley was after corn for grain as a predecessor. For this predecessor, the consumption of water by spring barley plants was the most economical – 375 m3/t of seeds for the cultivation technology, which involved the application of fertilizers in the dose of N45P90K90 + N45(IV). Cultivation of barley after soybeans increased water consumption to the level of 425 m3/t of seed, which is 50 m3/t of seed or 13 % more than growing after corn. In general, due to application of different doses of mineral fertilizers after soybeans, in years with different levels of precipitation and hydrothermal indicators, both during the autumn-winter storage period and during the spring-summer period, a decrease in the water consumption coefficient was detected by 33–301 m3/t, which indicates more efficient use of water by barley plants on fertilized variants compared to the control. After a corn as a predecessor, a similar dependence is observed. It was established that the highest yield of 4.88 t/ha of spring barley of Viraj was provided by the technology of cultivation with the application of fertilizers in the dose of N45P90K90 + N45(IV) on the background of an integrated protection system with the use of a growth stimulator after the predecessor corn for grain. Under similar cultivation technology, after soybeans as the predecessor, a lower yield at the level of 4.39 t/ha was received. The mathematical analysis of spring barley water consumption under different predecessors showed that there is an average correlation (r = 0.506) of productivity with total water consumption for growing after soybeans, a close relationship (r = 0.835) for growing after corn. At the same time, a close inverse relationship between yield and water consumption was established for both predecessors, as evidenced by the correlation coefficients, which were: for growing after soybeans r = –0.993, for growing after corn r = –0.957. In general, the level of water consumption depended on the fertilization system and the level of water supply after the predecessor.

References

1. Andersen, M. N., Jensen, C. R. & Lösch, R. (1992) The Interaction Effects of Potassium and Drought in Field-Grown Barley. I. Yield, Water-Use Efficiency and Growth, Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica, Section B – Soil & Plant Science, 42:1, 34–44. doi: 10.1080/09064719209410197
2. Borys, N., & Krasjuk, L. (2020). Pozhyvnyi rezhym siroho lisovoho gruntu zalezhno vid system osnovnoho obrobitku i udobrennia v korotkorotatsiinii zernovii sivozmini [Nutritional regime of gray forest soil аt diff erent anthropogenic loads]. Agrobiology, 2, 16–26 (in Ukrainian). doi: 10.33245/2310-9270-2020-161-2-16-26
3. Borysonik, Z. B. (1975). Yari kolosovi kultury [Spring ear crops]. Kyiv: Urozhai, 176 (in Ukrainian).
4. Datsko, O. M. & Zakharchenko, E. A. (2022). The characteristics of tillage methods under maize cultivation. Agrarian innovations, 13, 46–52. doi: 10.32848/agrar.innov.2022.13.7
5. Decouard, B., Bailly, M., Rigault, M., Marmagne, A., Arkoun, M., Soulay, F., Caïus, J., Paysant-Le Roux, C., Louahlia, S., Jacquard, C., Esmaeel, Q., Chardon, F., Masclaux-Daubresse, C. & Dellagi, A. (2022). Genotypic variation of nitrogen use efficiency and amino acid metabolism in barley. Front. Plant Sci. 12:807798. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2021.807798
6. Dindaroglu, T., Tunguz, V., Babur, E., Alkharabsheh, H. M., Seleiman, M. F., Roy, R., & Zakharchenko, E. (2022). The use of remote sensing to characterise geomorphometry and soil properties at watershed scale. International Journal of Global Warming, 27(4), 402–421. doi: 10.1504/IJGW.2022.10049112
7. Gamayunova, V. V., & Kuvshinova, A. O. (2020). Osoblyvosti vodospozhyvannia yachmeniu ozymoho zalezhno vid sortu i optymizatsii zhyvlennia v umovakh Pivdennoho Stepu Ukrainy [Features of water consumption of winter barley depending on a grade and optimization of food in the conditions of the Southern Steppe of Ukraine]. Agrarian innovations, 4, 10–17 (in Ukrainian). doi: 10.32848/agrar.innov.2020.4.2
8. Gamajunova, V., & Panfilova, A. (2020). The productivity of spring barley varieties depending on the optimization of nutrition in the southern steppe of Ukraine. AgroLife Scientific journal, 9(1), 132-140. Access mode: http://dspace.mnau.edu.ua/jspui/bitstream/123456789/8382/1/Art17.pdf
9. Hanhur, V. V., Len, O. I. & Hanhur, N. V. (2021). Effect of minimizing soil tillage on moisture supply and spring barley productivity in the zone of the Left-Bank Forest- Steppe of Ukraine. Bulletin of Poltava State Agrarian Academy, 1, 128–134. doi: 10.31210/visnyk2021.01.15
10. Hospodarenko, H., & Liubych, V. (2021). Influence of long-term fertilization on yield and quality of spring triticale grain. Research for rural development, 36, 29–35. doi: 10.22616/rrd.27.2021.004
11. Ivashchenko, L. (2007). Enerhozberihaiuchyi obrobitok gruntu [Energy-saving tillage]. Agronom, 2, 162–164 (in Ukrainian).
12. Kaflevska, S. H., & Koziar, N. O. (2013). Stan ta problemy rozvytku rynku zerna v Ukraini [State and problems of grain market development in Ukraine]. Efektyvna ekonomika, 4 (in Ukrainian). Access mode: http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/efek_2013_4_13.
13. Kharchenko, O., Zakharchenko, E., Kovalenko, I., Prasol, V., Pshychenko, O. & Mishchenko, Y. (2019). On problem of establishing the intensity level of crop variety and its yield value subject to the environmental conditions and constraints. AgroLife Scientific Journal, 8(1), 113–119.
14. Kovalenko, T. M. (2023). Influence of spring Barley plant nutrition optimization on yield formation in the Rightbank Foreststeppe of Ukraine. Agriculture and forestry, 1(28), 46–61. doi: 10.37128/2707-5826-2023-1-4
15. Kyrylyuk, V. P., & Shemiakin, M. V. (2017). Vplyv volohozabezpechennia vehetatsiinoho periodu na zapasy produktyvnoi volohy i vodospozhyvannia yachmeniu yaroho v umovakh Pravoberezhnoho Lisostepu [The influence of a moisture supply of a growing season on the stock of productive moisture and water consumption of spring barley under conditions of the rightbank Forest-steppe]. Bulletin of Uman National University of Horticulture, 1, 18–26 (in Ukrainian).
16. Kyryliuk, V., Tymoshchuk, T., & Kotelnytska, H. (2019). Vplyv system osnovnoho obrobitku hruntu ta udobrennia na produktyvnist yachmeniu yaroho [Yield and quality of barley grain according to the systems of basic tillage and fertilization]. Scientific Horizons, 9(82), 36–44 (in Ukrainian). doi: 10.33249/2663-2144-2019-82-9-36-44
17. Lib, I. M. (2012). Vodospozhyvannia roslyn yachmeniu yaroho v lankakh sivozmin zalezhno vid system obrobitku gruntu ta udobrennia [Biuleten Instytutu silskoho hospodarstva stepovoi zony NAAN Ukrainy], 3, 91-95 (in Ukrainian). URL: http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/bisg_2012_3_27
18. Lotysh, O. (2022). Rol Ukrainy na svitovomu rynku zerna: vyklyky i zahrozy [Ukraine's role in the global grain market: challenges and threats]. Ekonomika ta suspilstvo, 45 (in Ukrainian). doi: 10.32782/2524-0072/2022-45-56
19. Malienko, A., & Borys, N. (2019). Typovist hidrotermichnykh umov zony Pravoberezhnoho Lisostepu ta yi vplyv na produktyvnist kukurudzy [Typical hydrothermal conditions of the Right-bank Forest-step zone and their influence on corn productivity]. Agrobiology, 1, 55–64 (in Ukrainian). doi: 10.33245/2310-9270-2019-146-1-55-64
20. Mishchenko, Y., Kovalenko, I., Butenko, A., Danko, Y., Trotsenko, V., Masyk, I. Zakharchenko, E., Hotvianska, A., Kyrsanova, G., & Datsko, O. (2022). Post-harvest siderates and soil hardness. Ecological Engineering and Environmental Technology, 23(3), 54–63. doi: 10.12912/27197050/147148
21. Onufran, L. I. (2012). Vodospozhyvannia yachmeniu yaroho za riznykh umov vyroshchuvannia. Irrigated farming, 57, 144-148 (in Ukrainian). Access mode: http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/Zz_2012_57_24
22. Protsenko, D. S., & Padusenko, O. A. (2019). Efektyvnist vyrobnytstva yachmeniu v Ukraini: stan, problemy ta perspektyvy [Efficiency of barley production in Ukraine: state, problems and prospects]. Visnyk SNT NNI Biznesu i Menedzhmentu KhNTUSH, 2, 118–121 (in Ukrainian).
23. Radchenko, M. V., Trotsenko, V. I., Hlupak, Z. I., Zakharchenko, E. A., Osmachko, O. M., Moisiienko, V. V., Panchуshуn, V. Z., & Stotska, S. V. (2021). Influence of mineral fertilizers on yielding capacity and quality of soft spring wheat grain. Agronomy Research, 19(4), 1901–1913. doi: 10.15159/AR.21.104
24. Rajala A., Hakala K., Mäkelä P., & Peltonen-Sainio P. (2011). Drought effect on grain number and grain weight at spike and spikelet level in six-row spring barley. Journal of agronomy and crop science, 197(2), 103–112. doi: 10.1111/j.1439-037X.2010.00449.x
25. Roslynnytstvo Ukrainy 2018: statystychnyi zbirnyk [Crop production of Ukraine]. (2019). Kyiv: State Statistics Service of Ukraine, 220 (in Ukrainian).
26. Saiko V. F., & Malienko A. M. (2007). Systemy obrobitku gruntu [Tillage system]. Kyiv, 41 (in Ukrainian).
27. Shkurko, V. S. (2012). Vplyv pohodnykh umov, poperednykiv i dobryv na vrozhainist sortiv yachmeniu pyvovarnoho [The influence of weather conditions, precursors and fertilizers on the yield of malting barley varieties]. Bulletin of Poltava state agrarian academy, 3, 167–170 (in Ukrainian). doi: 10.31210/visnyk2012.03.36
28. Sobko, M., Medvid, S., & Bondarenko, I. (2023). Vplyv sposobiv osnovnoho obrobitku gruntu na vrozhainist yachmeniu yaroho. The influence of methods of main tillage on the yield of spring barley. Ahrobiznes sohodni. Access mode: http://agro-business.com.ua/agro/ahronomiia-sohodni.html (in Ukrainian).
29. Tsyliuryk O. I., Chorna V. I., Desyatnyk L. M., & Horshchar V. I. (2020). Vplyv sposobiv osnovnoho obrobitku hruntu na dynamiku zapasiv produktyvnoi volohy v posivakh yachmeniu yaroho v umovakh pivnichnoho stepu Ukrainy [Influence of methods of basic tillage on the dynamics of productive moisture reserves in spring barley crops in the conditions of the northern Steppe of Ukraine]. Grain Crops, 4 (2), 339–352 (in Ukrainian). doi: 10.31867/2523-4544/0143
30. Zabarna T. (2020). The influence of hydrothermal conditions on the cultivation of spring barley in the rightbank Forest-steppe of Ukraine. Sciences of Europe, 1(60), 10–19.
31. Zakharchenko, E., & Tunguz, V. (2020). Effect of ammonium sulfate and phosphogypsum application on nutrients dynamics and acidity of black soil. Bulletin of Sumy National Agrarian University. The Series: Agronomy and Biology, 42(4), 61–69. doi: 10.32845/agrobio.2020.4.8.
32. Zhang X., Wu D., & Zakharchenko E. А. (2022). Review on effects of biogas slurry application on crop growth. Agrarian innovations, 13, 155–165. doi: 10.32848/agrar.innov.2022.13.24.
33. Waraich, E. A., Rashid, A., Ashraf, M. Yaseen, Saifullah & Ahmad, M. (2011). Improving agricultural water use efficiency by nutrient management in crop plants. Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica, Section B – Soil & Plant Science, 61 (4), 291–304. doi: 10.1080/09064710.2010.491954
Published
2023-09-13
How to Cite
PorodkoM. А. (2023). WATER CONSUMPTION OF SPRING BARLEY PLANTS DEPENDS ON FERTILIZER AND PREDECESSOR. Bulletin of Sumy National Agrarian University. The Series: Agronomy and Biology, 52(2), 91-98. https://doi.org/10.32782/agrobio.2023.2.12