THE DEGREE OF INFLUENCE OF SIRE’S ORIGIN ON THE MANIFESTATION OF ECONOMICALLY USEFUL TRAITS OF THEIR DAUGHTERS IN CONVENTIONAL MILK PRODUCTION

Keywords: sires, milk production, reproductive capacity, exterior, constitution, desirable type, force of influence, paternal half-sisters

Abstract

In the article, on the basis of the research conducted in the conditions of the breeding plant for breeding cattle of dairy productivity of the State Enterprise "Nova Peremoha" in Zhytomyr region, the degree of influence of paternal origin on the manifestation of economically useful traits of their daughters was found out. The offspring of the five most numerous by the number of daughters of Holstein bulls were selected for the study: Asall DE 579542573 (n=19), Carmello DE 349214112 (n=149), Levits DE 356447182 (n=133), Density CA 10845509 (n=18) and Sarukko DE 350995813 (n=62). We found that the daughters of sires Sarukko and Carmello were characterized by the highest milk yields, their milk yields for 305 days of lactation were 5780 and 5718 kg of milk with a fat content of 3.54 and 3.55%, milk fat – 205 and 203 kg, relative milk yield – 973 and 999 kg. The live weight of daughters of different sire bulls varied widely. The difference between the extreme values in favor of the daughters of the Density bull was 62 kg compared to the values of the Levits daughters. The daughters of the bull Levitz were the closest to the optimal values of reproductive capacity indicators, their age at first insemination was 22 months, the duration of the service period was 117, the intercalation period was 395 days, and the reproductive capacity coefficient was 0.95. The best values of body structure measurements were observed in the daughters of the bull Density. They were taller at the withers (135 cm), in the rump (142), longer in the chest (82), oblique length of the body (172) and the rear (52), wider in the chest (46) and hocks (48 cm). The difference between the extreme values of all studied parameters in 63% of cases was highly significant (P<0.05-0.001). In terms of milk production, the parameters of the animals of the desired type of bull Density best corresponded to the parameters of the bull. The criterion for the reliability of the Student’s difference was the lowest and amounted to 3.09. In terms of body structure parameters, the criterion value reached almost the minimum level and amounted to 0.78 in favor of the daughters of the Carmello bull, and 0.61 in favor of the Sarukko bull in terms of reproductive capacity. The worst, for all blocks of traits, corresponded to the parameters of the desired type of cow bull Levits (7.09, 3.16 and 2.94, respectively).

References

1. Ahlman, T., Ljung, M., Rydhmer, L., Rocklinsberg, H., Strandberg, E., & Wallenbeck, A. (2014). Differences in preferences for breeding traits between organic and conventional dairy producers in Sweden. Livestock Science, 162, 5–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2013.12.014
2. Barbat, A., Le Mézec, P., Ducrocq, V., Mattalia, S., Fritz, S., Boichard, D., & Humblot, P. (2010). Female fertility in French dairy breeds: current situation and strategies for improvement. Journal of Reproduction and Development, 56 (S), 15–21.
3. Berry, D. P., Kearney, J. F., Twomey, K., & Evans, R. D. (2013). Genetics of reproductive performance in seasonal calving dairy cattle production systems. Irish Journal of Agricultural and Food Research, 1–16.
4. Berry, D. P., Wall, E., & Pryce, J. E. (2014). Genetics and genomics of reproductive performance in dairy and beef cattle. animal, 8 (s1), 105-121. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1751731114000743
5. Burkat, V. P., Polupan, Yu. P. (2005). Henezys poniat i metodiv ta suchasnyi selektsiinyi kontekst rozvedennia tvaryn za liniiamy. [Genesis of concepts and methods and modern breeding context of animal breeding by lines]. Rozvedennia i henetyka tvaryn. Kyiv, 38, 3–36 (in Ukrainian).
6. Cilek, S. (2009). Milk yield traits of Holstein cows raised at Polatli state farm in Turkey. Journal of Animal and Veterinary Advances, 8(1), 6–10.
7. Cromie, A. R., Berry, D. P., Wickham, B., Kearney, J. F., Pena, J., Van Kaam, J. B. C. H., & Spelman, R. (2010). International Genomic Cooperation; Who, what, when, where, why and how? Interbull Bulletin, 42, 1–8.
8. Danylenko, V. P., Rudyk, I. A., Oleshko, V. P., & Babenko O. I. (2010). Formuvannia vysokoproduktyvnoho stada molochnoi khudoby. [Formation of high-efficiency herd of dairy cattle]. Tekhnolohiia vyrobnytstva i pererobky produktsii tvarynnytstva. Bila Tserkva, 3 (72), 73–76 (in Ukrainian).
9. Eggen, A. (2012). The development and application of genomic selection as a new breeding paradigm. Animal frontiers, 2(1), 10–15. https://doi.org/10.2527/af.2011-0027
10. Fahrenkrug, S. C., Blake, A., Carlson, D. F., Doran, T., Van Eenennaam, A., Faber, D., & Glenn, B. P. (2010). Precision genetics for complex objectives in animal agriculture. Journal of animal science, 88 (7), 2530–2539. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2010-2847
11. Fedorovych, Y. I., Fedorovych, V. V., Bodnar, P. V., Fyl, S. I., Dymchuk, A. V., & Orikhivskyj, T. V. (2021). Spivvidnosna minlyvist fenotypovykh oznak ta pokaznykiv molochnoi produktyvnosti koriv. [Relative variability of phenotypic traits and indicators of milk productivity of cows]. Naukovyi visnyk LNUVMB imeni S. Z. Gzhytskoho. Seriia : Silskohospodarski nauky, 23, (95), 101–107 (in Ukrainian). https://doi.org/10.32718/nvlvet-a9515
12. Fedorovych, Y. I., Shpyt, І. V., Fedorovych, V. V., Tkachuk, V. P., & Chornyj, I. O. (2023). Formuvannia oznak molochnoi produktyvnosti koriv zalezhno vid ikh pokhodzhennia za batkom. [Formation of signs of milk productivity ofcows depending on their origin by father]. Naukovyi visnyk LNUVMB imeni S. Z. Gzhytskoho. Seriia : Silskohospodarski nauky, 25(98), 142–148 (in Ukrainian). https://doi.org/10.32718/nvlvet-a9824
13. Foksha, V. F., Konstandoglo, A., Morar, G., Peykov, G., & Tataru, G. (2018). Exterior of Holstein cows of Dutch and German breeding. In Scientific Papers Series D. Animal Science, 61, 46–51.
14. Foksha, V., & Konstandoglo, A. (2019). Dairy productivity of Holstein cows and realization of their genetic potential. Bulgarian Journal of Agricultural Science, 25 (1), 31–36.
15. Foksha, V., Kendigelian, A., Konstandoglo, A., Akbash, M., Kurulyuk, V., & Tataru, G. (2016). Evaluation of dairy productivity of Dutch Holstein cows. Collection of papers of the Symposium. Science. With International participation "Zootechnyl Science – an important factor for a European type of agriculture", 793–798.
16. Humblot, P., Le Bourhis, D., Fritz, S., Colleau, J. J., Gonzalez, C., Guyader Joly, C., & Ponsart, C. (2010). Reproductive technologies and genomic selection in cattle. Veterinary Medicine International, 2010. https://doi.org/10.4061/2010/192787
17. Jenko, J., Gorjanc, G., Kovač, M., & Ducrocq, V. (2013). Comparison between sire-maternal grandsire and animal models for genetic evaluation of longevity in a dairy cattle population with small herds. Journal of dairy science, 96 (12), 8002 –8013. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2013-6830
18. Khaertdinov, I. M. (2016). Influence of servicing bulls on the growth rate of young cattle and further dairy efficiency of cows. Bulletin of Mari State University, 3 (7), 64–67.
19. Khmelnychyi S. L. (2018). Efektyvnist selektsii koriv sumskoho vnutrishnopo- rodnoho typu ukrainskoi chorno-riaboi molochnoi porody za eksterierom zalezhno vid henetychnykh faktoriv [Efficiency of selection of cows of Sumy domestic type of Ukrainian black-and-white dairy breed by exterior depending on genetic factors]. Visnyk Sumskoho natsionalnoho ahrarnoho universytetu. Seriia «Tvarynnytstvo»,7 (35), 61–67 (in Ukrainian). http://repo.snau.edu.ua/handle/123456789/6604
20. Khmelnychyi, L. M., Karpenko, B. M., & Suprun, I. O. (2023). Holshtynska poroda – henezys, biolohichni osoblyvosti ta efektyvnist yii vykorystannia dlia stvorennia i vdoskonalennia spetsializovanykh molochnykh pored [Holstein breed - genesis, biological characteristics and effectiveness of its use for the creation and improvement of specialized dairy breeds]. Visnyk Sumskoho natsionalnoho ahrarnoho universytetu. Seriia: Tvarynnytstvo, (4), 59-71 (in Ukrainian). https://doi.org/10.32782/bsnau.lvst.2023.4.7
21. Konstandoglo, A., Foksha, V. F., Kendigelyan, A., & Akbash, I. (2018). Implementation of the genetic potential of productivity of cows of Holstein breed in the south of R. Moldova. Scientific Papers. Series D. Animal Science, 61(2), 34–37.
22. Konstandoglo, A., Foksha, V. F., Morar, G., & Kurulyuk, V. (2021). Comparative characteristics of exterior and economically useful features of daughters of different bulls. Scientific Papers. Series D. Animal Science, 64(1), 50–56.
23. Kramarenko, O. S. (2024). Vplyv faktora pokhodzhennia za batkom na molochnu produktyvnist koriv. Influence of the paternal ancestry factor on the milk production of cows [Variability of ethological traits of cows depending on the level of productivity]. Tavriiskyi naukovyi visnyk, 135 (1), 188-196 (in Ukrainian). https://doi.org/10.32782/2226-0099.2024.135.1.25
24. Kucher, D.M., Kochuk-Yashchenko O.A., Sliusar, M.V., Tkachuk, S.M., & Karykh, K.V. (2022). Vplyv pokhodzhennia za batkom na proiav hospodarsky korysnykh oznak yikh dochok za orhanichnoho ta konventsiinoho vyrobnytstva moloka [Influence of paternal origin on the manifestation of economically useful traits of their daughters in organic and conventional milk production]. Rozvedennia i henetyka tvaryn, 64, 34-46 (in Ukrainian). DOI: https://doi.org/10.31073/abg.64.04
25. Majewska, A., Czaja, H., & Wójcik, P. (2002). Impact of father on the age of first calving and subsequent milk productivity of the Polish Black-and-White first-calf heifers. Zeszyty Naukowe Przeglądu Hodowlanego, 62, 155–159.
26. Martínez, J. L., Bernal, J. Q., & Herrera, L. G. (2019). Estimación de parámetros genéticos para producción de leche en el día de control ya los 305 días en primeras lactancias de vacas Lucerna. Livestock Research for Rural Development, 31, 179. http://www.lrrd.org/lrrd31/11/luggo31179.html
27. Nauta, W. J., Veerkamp, R. F., Brascamp, E. W., & Bovenhuis, H. (2006). Genotype by environment interaction for milk production traits between organic and conventional dairy cattle production in the Netherlands. Journal of Dairy Science,89 (7), 2729–2737. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(06)72349-9
28. Pelekhatyi, M. S., Kochuk-Yashchenko, O. A., Kucher, D. M., & Novosad, V. V. (2020). Rol buhaiv-plidnykiv u polipshenni hospodarsky korysnykh oznak potomstva [The role of sire bulls in improving economically useful traits of offspring]. Visnyk Sumskoho natsionalnoho ahrarnoho universytetu. Seriia: Tvarynnytstvo, 1(40), 17-24 (in Ukrainian). https://doi.org/10.32845/bsnau.lvst.2020.1.3
29. Pidpala, T. V., Zaitsev, Ye. M., & Pravda, A. O. (2019). Rezultaty vykorystannia buhaiv-plidnykiv holshtynskoi porody pry stvorenni vysokoproduktyvnoho stada [Results of the use of Holstein bulls in the creation of a highly productive herd]. Scientific Progress & Innovations, (1), 169-180. https://doi.org/10.31210/visnyk2019.01.16
30. Pikula, O. (2022). Selection of cattle by production types. Modern engineering and innovative technologies, (23-01), 146–166. https://doi.org/10.30890/2567-5273.2022-23-01-043
31. Polishchuk, T. V. (2019). Minlyvist etolohichnykh oznak koriv zalezhno vid rivnia produktyvnosti [Variability of ethological traits of cows depending on the level of productivity]. Ahrarna nauka ta kharchovi tekhnolohii, 4 (103), 117–128 (in Ukrainian).
32. Polupan, Yu., Kucher, D., Kochuk-Yashchenko, O., & Biriukova, O. (2021). Evaluation of bulls and related groups of the jersey breed on dairy productivity and reproductive capacity of offspring. Scientific Horizons, 24(5), 54-68. DOI: 10.48077/scihor.24(5).2021.54-68
33. Pryce, J. E., Goddard, M. E., Raadsma, H. W., & Hayes, B. J. (2010). Deterministic models of breeding scheme designs that incorporate genomic selection. Journal of Dairy Science, 93 (11), 5455–5466. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2010-3256
34. Spelman, R. J., Hayes, B. J., & Berry, D. P. (2013). Use of molecular technologies for the advancement of animal breeding: genomic selection in dairy cattle populations in Australia, Ireland and New Zealand. Animal Production Science, 53 (9), 869–875. https://doi.org/10.1071/AN12304
35. Vijayakumar, M., Park, J. H., Ki, K. S., Lim, D. H., Kim, S. B., Park, S. M., & Kim, T. I. (2017). The effect of lactation number, stage, length, and milking frequency on milk yield in Korean Holstein dairy cows using automatic milking system. Asian-Australasian journal of animal sciences, 30 (8), 1093–1098. https://doi.org/10.5713%2Fajas.16.0882
36. Wiggans, G. R., Cole, J. B., Hubbard, S. M., & Sonstegard, T. S. (2017). Genomic selection in dairy cattle: the USDA experience. Annual review of animal biosciences, 5, 309–327. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-animal-021815-111422
Published
2024-07-23
How to Cite
Kochuk-Yashchenko, O. A., Yevtukh, L. H., Kucher, D. M., & Trokhymets, O. V. (2024). THE DEGREE OF INFLUENCE OF SIRE’S ORIGIN ON THE MANIFESTATION OF ECONOMICALLY USEFUL TRAITS OF THEIR DAUGHTERS IN CONVENTIONAL MILK PRODUCTION. Bulletin of Sumy National Agrarian University. The Series: Livestock, (2), 60-67. https://doi.org/10.32782/bsnau.lvst.2024.2.9