Seasonal dependence of sow productivity of danish origin from constructive features ventilation systems during hair and lactation
Abstract
In the article the annual dynamics of reproductive qualities of sows of Danish origin during their keeping in the premises of the industrial complex was compared under different systems of microclimate creation in the conditions of the steppe of Ukraine. No regularities were established for the total number of piglets born, multiplicity, fertility, weight of piglets nests at birth, and the number of piglets weaned in sows kept during the suckling period in classic and «Exatope» ventilation machines. At the same time, it was found that «Exatope» ventilation has a significant excess of 0,46 – 0,51 kg, or 6,83-8,37% of the weight of one pig, and 5,87 – 7,73 kg or 6,26 – 8,37% of the nest weight of the piglets when weaned. Also, a comprehensive evaluation index was higher in animals kept in this facility. It was found that the time of year significantly affected the reproduction rates of sows kept in the premises under both ventilation systems. The best indicators were the winter-spring period of the year worse in the summer and autumn. The highest fertility was found in the furrowing animals, which accounted for the winter and season seasons for both ventilation systems 15,14 – 14,78 heads, and the lowest were in the autumn 13,97 – 14,52 (p <0,001). The best conservation of piglets was established in the spring of 95,20 – 94,47%, and the worse in the summer – 88,30 – 91,06% (p <0,05). In the transitional seasons, it had an intermediate rate. The number of pigs weaned also turned out to be the highest in the spring of the year, 13,91 – 13,86 heads, while in the autumn it was 12,93 – 13,14 heads (p <0,01). The weight of one piglet when weaned was highest in winter 6,88 – 7,35 kg, and lowest in summer 6,07 – 6,53 kg (p <0,001). Weight of nests of piglets when weaned was highest in winter 94,39 – 101,00, and lowest in autumn – 79,38 – 87,11 (p <0,001). The best estimates of the comprehensive index of reproductive features were calculated in sows in winter 49,25 – 50,03, and the worst in autumn –46,41 – 46,90. Using analysis of variance, it was found that sows' reproductive characteristics were influenced by both the season and the ventilation system. Greater force of influence differed the time of year, which probably influenced the weight of one piglet by 21,25% and the mass of the nest at weaning – 19,65%, the conservation of piglets before weaning by – 11,74% and multiplicity – 7,55%. At the same time, the ventilation system had a lower impact on these indicators – on the weight of one piglet by 10,55% and the mass of the nest when weaned – 5,69%, the conservation of piglets before weaning by – 4,09%, and on its multiplicity it had a significant impact. The interaction of these two factors practically did not influence the change of the studied indicators.
References
2. Herasymchuk V.M., 2018. Assessment and improvement of ventilation of pigs for various purposes. Ph.D. Thesis. Instytut svynarstva i ahropromyslovoho vyrobnytstva NAAN Ukrainy.
3. Herasymchuk V.M. and Voloshchuk V.M., 2017. Efektyvnist stvorennia mikroklimatu u matochnyku pry riznykh sposobakh podachi ta vydalennia povitria [Efficiency of creation of a microclimate in a uterus at various ways of giving and removal of air]. Svynarstvo. Mizhvidomchyi tematychnyi naukovyi zbirnyk Instytutu svynarstva i APV NAAN, issue 69, pp. 9–18.
4. Demchuk M.V., 2006. Mikroklimat ta efektyvnist roboty systemy ventyliatsii v rekonstruiovanykh prymishchenniakh dlia svynei v rizni periody roku [Microclimate and efficiency of ventilation system in reconstructed pig rooms in different seasons]. Nauk. visn. LNAVM, issue 8, v 1(28), pp. 36–42.
5. Ignatkin I.Y. and Kuryachiy M.G., 2012. Sistemyi ventilyatsii i vliyanie parametrov mikroklimata na produktivnost sviney [Ventilation systems and the influence of microclimate parameters on pig productivity]. Vestnik NGIEI, issue 10 (17), pp. 16-34.
6. Ilin I.V., Ignatkin I.Y. and Kuryachiy M. G., 2011. Vliyanie parametrov mikroklimata na produktivnost sviney [The influence of microclimate parameters on pig productivity]. Effektivnoe zhivotnovodstvo. Svinovodstvo, issue 05/67, pp. 30–31.
7. Listsov A.V., 2010. Mikroklimat v svinarnike: dyishite glubzhe [Microclimate in the pigsty: breathe deeper]. Ohorona pratsi i tehnika bezpeki v silskomu gospodarstvi, issue 11. pp. 42-44.
8. Mylostyvyi R.V., Povod M.H. and Samokhina Y.A., 2018. Parametry mikroklimatu v svynarskykh prymishchenniakh vlitku za riznykh system ventyliatsii ta yikhnii vplyv na produktyvnist laktuiuchykh svynomatok i rist pidsysnykh porosiat [Microclimate parameters in pig farms in summer under different ventilation systems and their effect on lactating sows productivity and suckling pig growth]. Visnyk Sumskoho natsionalnoho ahrarnoho universytetu. Tvarynnytstvo, issue 2 (34), pp. 218-223.
9. Povod M.H. and Tkachuk O.D., 2016. Mikroklimat prymishchen ta produktyvni pokaznyky svynei za riznykh umov yikh doroshchuvannia v osinno-zymovyi period [Microclimate of the premises and performance of pigs in different conditions of their growing in autumn and winter]. Naukovo-tekhnichnyi biuleten IT NAAN, issue 115, pp. 208–214.
10. Povod M.H., 2017. Vplyv pory roku na vidtvorni yakosti svynomatok danskoi selektsii [Influence of seasons on reproductive qualities of sows of Danish breeding]. Visnyk Sumskoho natsionalnoho ahrarnoho universytetu. Tvarynnytstvo, issue 5(2), pp. 111-113.
11. Starodubets O.O., 2015. Vplyv sezonu roku na vidtvoriuvalni yakosti svynomatok [Influence of the season of the year on the reproductive qualities of sows]. Visnyk ahrarnoi nauky prychornomoria, issue 4, vol. 2, pp. 100-103.
12. Topchii, L.I., 2008. Vplyv sezonnosti na vidtvoriuvalni yakosti svynomatok ukrainskoi stepovoi biloi porody svynei [Influence of seasonality on reproductive qualities of sows of Ukrainian steppe white breed of pigs]. Visnyk Instytutu tvarynnytstva stepovykh raioniv imeni M.F. Ivanova «Askaniia Nova», pp. 155-160.
13. Honeyman M.S., 2001. Outdoor Pig Production. PIH – 145. Pork Industry Handbook. Purdue University, p. 9.