RISK-BASED CONTROL OF FOOD PRODUCTS AND THE POWERS THAT MAKE THEM CIRCULATE
Abstract
The main aspect of protecting the public health of the population is control and supervision, which ensure the implementation of management decisions. During supervision, compliance with applicable norms and requirements is checked in order to prevent diseases of the population after consuming the products. Diseases of the food chain are widespread in most countries of the world, are one of the main causes of morbidity and a problem for public health. Reducing the frequency of foodborne infections is ensured by changes in the legislative framework, the practice of production and circulation of food products, the concept and approaches to conducting inspections of market operators. Risk-oriented control of food products and capacities is based on the analysis and assessment of potential risks, inspection of food market operators, planning and implementation of state control measures. The criteria for assessing the risk of food products and categorizing capacities, which are oriented towards international requirements and best practices, are important. The regulatory framework in the areas of food safety and sanitary legislation, which regulates the inspection of market operators, was analyzed, and the data of the state register of capacities of market operators in the circulation of food products were studied. Pa study was conducted on the categorization of capacities at the stages of primary production, transportation, storage and sale of food products. According to the results of the inspection of food products, 91.7% of the inspected batches had a slight degree of risk to human health. According to the results of the categorization of market operators, the dominant share is made up of objects of a minor degree of risk – 92.9% of the total number of inspected capacities; 5.8% of market operators are assigned to a low degree of risk, 0.9% of market operators have an average degree of risk, and 0.4% have a high degree of risk. Among the inspected public catering establishments, two facilities with a significant and medium degree of non-compliance with the requirements were found – 2.2%, respectively, the vast majority of facilities had a low degree of risk, which was 39.1% of the number of those examined. According to the results of the conducted work, violations of requirements regarding procedures based on principles (HACСР) were found. In order to minimize the negative impact on the safety of food products, market operators were given recommendations on the application of appropriate sanitary measures and the requirements of ongoing prerequisite programs.
References
2. Angouria-Tsorochidou, E., & Thomsen, M. (2021). Modelling the quality of organic fertilizers from anaerobic digestion—Comparison of two collection systems. J Clean Prod. 304:127081. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127081
3. Bentia, D.C. (2021). Accountability beyond measurement. The role of meetings in shaping governance instruments and governance outcomes in food systems through the lens of the Donau Soja organisation. J Rural Stud. 88:50–9. doi: 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2021.09.026
4. Bickley, S.J., & Torgler, B. A. (2021). Systematic approach to public health—Novel application of the human factors analysis and classification system to public health and COVID-19. Saf Sci. 140:105312. doi: 10.1016/j.ssci.2021.105312
5. Bowles, A. (2019). Enforcement authority perspective on the food manufacturing sector (UK EHO). In: Swainson M, editor. Swainson’s Handbook of Technical and Quality Management for the Food Manufacturing Sector. Sawston, United Kingdom: Woodhead Publishing, 385–410.
6. Coppola, D.P. (2020). Chapter 6—response. In: Coppola DP, editor. Introduction to International Disaster Management (Fourth Edition). Oxford, United Kingdom: Butterworth-Heinemann, 393–470, e326.
7. Diehlmann, F., Lüttenberg, M., Verdonck, L., Wiens, M., & Zienau, A., & Schultmann, F. (2021). Public-private collaborations in emergency logistics: a framework based on logistical and game-theoretical concepts. Saf Sci., 141:105301. doi: 10.1016/j.ssci.2021.105301
8. Ding, Jian, Qiao, Ping, Wang, Jiaxing & Huang, Hongyan (2022). Impact of food safety supervision efficiency on preventing and controlling mass public crisisSec. Public Health and Nutrition. Frontiers in Public Health, 1-15. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2022.1052273
9. Gauri, V. (2013). Redressing grievances and complaints regarding basic service delivery. World Dev. 41:109–19. doi: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2012.05.027
10. Gray, J., Hu, Y., Wilson, A., Chandry, P.S., Tinoco, M.B., & Jordan, K.N. (2021). The role of genomics in food quality and safety management: possibilities and limitations. In: Cifuentes A, editor. Comprehensive Foodomics. Elsevier, 127–37.
11. Hassauer, C., & Roosen, J. (2020). Toward a conceptual framework for food safety criteria: analyzing evidence practices using the case of plant protection products. Saf Sci. 127:104683. doi: 10.1016/j.ssci.2020.104683
12. He, J. A. (2015). Review of Chinese fish trade involving the development and limitations of food safety strategy. Ocean Coast Manage., 116:150–61. doi: 10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2015.07.017
13. Henrique, de Moura E., Bruno Rocha e Cruz, T., De Genaro & Chiroli, D.M. (2020). A framework proposal to integrate humanitarian logistics practices, disaster management and disaster mutual assistance: a Brazilian case. Saf Sci., 132:104965. doi: 10.1016/j.ssci.2020.104965
14. Hsu, B-X, Chen, Y-M, & Chen, L-A. (2022). Corporate social responsibility and value added in the supply chain: Model and mechanism. Technol Forecast Soc Change, 174:121302. doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121302
15. Kaur, K, & Randhawa, G. (2021). Exploring the influence of supportive supervisors on organisational citizenship behaviours: Linking theory to practice. IIMB Manage Rev., 33:156–65. doi: 10.1016/j.iimb.2021.03.012
16. Krishnaswami, A., Beavers, C., Dorsch, M.P., Dodson, J.A., Masterson, Creber, R., & Kitsiou, S. (2020). Gerotechnology for older adults with cardiovascular diseases: JACC state-of-the-art review. J Am Coll Cardiol., 76:2650–70. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2020.09.606
17. Lee, J., Huang, Y-H, Dainoff, M.J., & He, Y. (2021). Where to focus? Insights from safety personnel and external safety consultants on lessons learned about safety climate interventions—A qualitative approach. J Saf Res., 79:51–67. doi: 10.1016/j.jsr.2021.08.005
18. Linde, L., Sjödin, D., Parida, V., & Wincent, J. (2021). Dynamic capabilities for ecosystem orchestration A capability-based framework for smart city innovation initiatives. Technol Forecast Soc Change, 166:120614. doi: 10.1016/j.techfore. 2021.120614
19. Luger, M., Hofer, K.M., & Floh, A. (2021). Support for corporate social responsibility among generation Y consumers in advanced versus emerging markets. Int Bus Rev., 101903. doi: 10.1016/j.ibusrev.2021.101903
20. Marques, C.M., Moniz, S., de Sousa J.P., Barbosa-Povoa, A.P., & Reklaitis, G. (2020). Decision-support challenges in the chemical-pharmaceutical industry: Findings and future research directions. Comput Chem Eng., 134:106672. doi: 10.1016/j.compchemeng.2019.106672
21. Martindale, L. (2021). From land consolidation and food safety to taobao villages and alternative food networks: four components of China’s dynamic agri-rural innovation system. J Rural Stud., 82:404–16. doi: 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2021.01.012
22. Miranda, B.V., Monteiro, G.F.A., & Rodrigues, V.P. (2021). Circular agri-food systems: a governance perspective for the analysis of sustainable agrifood value chains. Technol Forecast Soc Change, 170:120878. doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2021.120878
23. Nyarugwe, S.P., Linnemann, A.R., Ren, Y, Bakker, E.J., Kussaga, J.B., & Watson, D. (2020). An intercontinental analysis of food safety culture in view of food safety governance and national values. Food Control, 111:107075. doi: 10.1016/j.foodcont.2019.107075
24. Ogunniyi, A.I., Mavrotas, G., Olagunju, K.O., Fadare, O., & Adedoyin, R. (2020). Governance quality, remittances and their implications for food and nutrition security in Sub-Saharan Africa. World Dev., 127:104752. doi: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2019.104752
25. Pal, I., Ghosh, T., & Ghosh, C. (2017). Institutional framework and administrative systems for effective disaster risk governance – Perspectives of 2013 Cyclone Phailin in India. Int J Disaster Risk Reduct., 21:350–9. doi: 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2017.01.002
26. Price, J.C., & Forrest, J.S. (2016). Chapter 12 – Airport Emergency Planning, Part III. In: Price JC, Forrest JS, editors. Practical Airport Operations, Safety, and Emergency Management, Oxford, United Kingdom: Butterworth-Heinemann, 489–556.
27. Rodrigues, D., Teixeira, R,, & Shockley, J. (2019). Inspection agency monitoring of food safety in an emerging economy: a multilevel analysis of Brazil’s beef production industry. Int J Prod Econ., 214:1–16. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2019. 03.024
28. Ryan, J.M. (2017). Chapter 1 – Background: Understanding common and assignable causes, laws, and costs. In: Ryan JM, editor. Validating Preventive Food Safety and Quality Controls. Cambridge, MA: Academic Press, 1–29.
29. Savaglio, C., Ganzha, M., Paprzycki, M., Ba˘dica,˘ C., Ivanovic, M., & Fortino, G. (2020). Agent-based Internet of Things: State-of-the-art and research challenges. Future Gener Comput Syst., 102:1038–53. doi: 10.1016/j.future.2019.09.016
30. Sepahvand, M., & Abdali-Mohammadi, F. A. (2021). Novel multi-lead ECG personal recognition based on signals functional and structural dependencies using timefrequency representation and evolutionary morphological CNN. Biomed Signal Process Control, 68:102766. doi: 10.1016/j.bspc.2021.102766
31. Sun, D., Liu, Y., Grant, J., Long, Y., Wang, X., & Xie, C. (2021). Impact of food safety regulations on agricultural trade: Evidence from China’s import refusal data. Food Policy, 105:102185. doi: 10.1016/j.foodpol.2021.102185
32. Trienekens, J., & Zuurbier, P. (2008). Quality and safety standards in the food industry, developments and challenges. Int J Prod Econ., 113:107–22. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2007.02.050
33. Vara-Sánchez, I., Gallar-Hernández, D., García-García, L., Morán Alonso, N., & Moragues-Faus, A. (2021). The co-production of urban food policies: exploring the emergence of new governance spaces in three Spanish cities. Food Policy, 103:102120. doi: 10.1016/j.foodpol.2021.102120
34. Wang, Q., An, D., Wen, L., Shi, Y., Meng, Y., & Lu, W. (2012). Food hygiene supervision during a major conference in Beijing: descriptive analysis of impact on risk factors. Food Control, 28:279–85. doi: 10.1016/j.foodcont.2012.05.053
35. Yang, X.T., Qian, J.P., Li, J., Ji, Z.T., Fan, B., & Xing, B. (2016). A real-time agro-food authentication and supervision system on a novel code for improving traceability credibility. Food Control, 66:17–26. doi: 10.1016/j.foodcont.2016. 01.032
36. Zhenyu, Lei (2020). Research on food safety supervision. E3S Web of Conferences 185, 04066 (2020) ICEEB 2020. doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202018504066
ISSN 
ISSN 
