THE USE OF FEED ENZYME IN THE DIET OF SLOW AND SUCKING SOWS

Keywords: feed additive, compound feed, sow, reproductive qualities.

Abstract

Feed additive Allzyme PT of the leading feed company Alltech UK Ltd. is an enzyme agent for better digestibility of wheat, rye or triticale in the rations of poultry and pigs. The general effect of the use of this drug consists in the neutralization of antinutrients, the release and assimilation of additional metabolic energy, the increase of protein digestibility and the availability of amino acids, and the reduction of chyme viscosity. The use of this feed additive allows you to increase the nutritional value of cereals by 4-10%, depending on the type and grade of cereal ingredients of the diet. Having analyzed the results of the research and production experiment, it can be concluded that the best effect on the reproductive qualities of sows has the addition to the diet of the combination complex of feed preparations "sunflower oil + feed enzyme Allzyme PT". This is explained by the fact that vegetable oils contain a large amount of unsaturated fatty acids – linoleic and linolenic, which are necessary for building cells and some hormones, but cannot be synthesized in the body of pigs. The use in diets of specific enzyme complexes that break down non-starch polysaccharides allows to significantly increase the assimilation of nutrients from it. As a result, the level of metabolic energy, assimilation of protein and amino acids, carbohydrates increases significantly. Having analyzed the obtained results of the research and production experiment, we can conclude that the best effect on the reproductive qualities of sows has the addition to the diet of the combination complex of feed preparations "sunflower oil + feed enzyme Allzyme PT". This is explained by the fact that vegetable oils contain a large amount of unsaturated fatty acids – linoleic and linolenic, which are necessary for the construction of cells and some hormones, but cannot be synthesized in the body of pigs. The use in diets of specific enzyme complexes that break down non-starch polysaccharides allows to significantly increase the assimilation of nutrients from it. As a result, the level of metabolic energy, assimilation of protein and amino acids, carbohydrates increases significantly. The simultaneous use of such an optimal combination of feed additives conditions the improvement of feed conversion due to its digestibility, and, as a result, has a positive effect on improving feed assimilation, increasing the preservation of piglets and their live weight, which in general leads to a decrease in costs per unit of production, which also confirmed the economic analysis of zootechnical research results. Additional annual income on the farm after the introduction into the technology of feeding sows, the addition of sunflower oil to the main ration adopted in the farm together with the enzyme feed Allzaim PT will allow to increase the production of products in the breeding area by UAH 5198.8. on the nest of sows. Calculations were made in the prices of fodder, the purchase of feed additives and the sale of piglets to the population on November 1, 2022.

References

1. Adeola, O., & Cowieson, A. J. (2011). Board-invited review: Opportunities and challenges in using exogenous enzymes to improve on ruminant animal production. Journal of Animal Science, 89(10), 3189–3218. https://doi.org/10.2527/ jas.2010-3715
2. Araújo, W. A. G. de, Albino, L. F. T., Rostagno, H. S., Hannas, M. I., Luengas, J. A. P., Silva, F. C. de O., Carvalho, T. A., & Maia, R. C. (2014). Sunflower meal and supplementation of enzyme complex in diets for growing and finishing pigs. Brazilian Journal of Veterinary Research and Animal Science, 51(1), 49– 59. https://doi.org/10.11606/issn.1678-4456. v51i1p49-59
3. Cadogan, D. J., & Choct, M. (2015). Pattern of non-starch polysaccharide digestion along the gut of the pig: Contribution to available energy. Animal Nutrition, 1(3), 160–165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aninu.2015.08.011
4. Choct, M., Dersjant-Li, Y., McLeish, J., & Peisker, M. (2010). Soy oligosaccharides and soluble non-starch polysaccharides: a review of digestion, nutritive and anti-nutritive effects in pigs and poultry. Asian Austal J Anim., 1386–1398. https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2010.90222
5. Cromwell, G. L. (2008). ASAS centennial paper: Landmark discoveries in swine nutrition in the past century. J Anim Sci., 87(2), 778–92. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2008-1463
6. Heyer, C. M. E., Jaworski, N. W., Page, G. I., & Zijlstra, R. T. (2022). Effect of Fiber Fermentation and Protein Digestion Kinetics on Mineral Digestion in Pigs. Animals (Basel), 12(16), 2053. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani12162053
7. Jha, R., & Berrocoso, J. D. (2015). Review: Dietary fiber utilization and its effects on physiological functions and gut health of swine. Animal, 9, 1441–1452. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1751731115000919
8. Khalak, V. I., & Gutyj, B. V. (2022). Riven fenotypovoho proiavu hodivelno-miasnykh yakostei molodniaku svynei riznoi vnutrishnoporodnoi dyferentsiatsii za deiakymy bahatokomponentnymy pokaznykamy otsinky. [Level of phenotypic manifestation of feeding and meat qualities of young pigs of different intrabreed differentiation according to some multicomponent evaluation indexes]. Ukrainian Journal of Veterinary and Agricultural Sciences, 5(1), 66–70. (in Ukrainian). https://doi.org/10.32718/ujvas5-1.11
9. l’Anson, K. A., Choct, M., & Brooks, PH. (2013). Effect of feed processing and enzyme supplementation on diet digestibility and performance of male weaner pigs fed wheat-based diets in dry or liquid form. Anim Prod Sci., 53, 531–539. https://doi.org/10.1071/AN12256
10. Lindberg, J. E. (2014). Fiber effects in nutrition and gut health in pigs. Journal of Animal Science and Biotechnology, 5(1), 2–7. https://doi.org/15.10.1186/2049-1891-5-15
11. Masey O'Neill, H. V., Smith, J. A., & Bedford, M. R. (2014). Multicarbohydrase enzymes for non-ruminants. Asian- Australasian Journal Animal Sciences, 27(2), 290–301. doi: 10.5713/ajas.2013.13261
12. McGlone, J. J. (2013). The Future of Pork Production in the World: Towards Sustainable, Welfare-Positive Systems. Animals (Basel). 3(2), 401–15. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani3020401
13. Mykhalko, O. G. (2020). Vidhodivelni yakosti svynei irlandskoho pokhodzhennia pry riznykh typakh hodivli [Fattening qualities of Irish pigs origin at different types of feeding]. Bulletin of the Sumy National Agrarian University. Series "Livestock", 3(42), 52–57. (in Ukrainian). https://doi.org/10.32845/bsnau.lvst.2020.3.9
14. Nguyen, D. H., Park, J. W., & Kim, I. H. ( 2017). Effect of crumbled diet on growth performance, market day age and meat quality of growing-finishing pigs. J. Appl. Anim. Res., 45, 396–399. https://doi.org/10.1080/09712119.2016.1206904
15. Nortey, T. N., Patience, J. F., Simmins, P. H., Trottier, N. L., & Zijlstra, R. T. (2007). Effects of individual or combined xylanase and phytase supplementation on energy, amino acid, and phosphorus digestibility and growth performance of grower swine fed wheat-based diets containing wheat millrun. J Anim Sci., 85, 1432–1443. https://doi.org/10.2527/ jas.2006-613
16. Novgorodska, N., & Fabiianska, O. (2022). Use of enzyme preparations in pig feeding. Scientific Messenger of LNU of Veterinary Medicine and Biotechnologies. Series: Agricultural Sciences, 24(97), 70–75. https://doi.org/10.32718/ nvlvet-a9712
17. O'Doherty, J. V., Venardou, B., Rattigan, R., & Sweeney, T. (2021). Feeding Marine Polysaccharides to Alleviate the Negative Effects Associated with Weaning in Pigs. Animals (Basel), 11(9), 2644. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11092644
18. Passos, A. A., Park, I., Ferket, P., von Heimendahl, E., & Kim, S. W. Effect of dietary supplementation of xylanase on apparent ileal digestibility of nutrients, viscosity of digesta, and intestinal morphology of growing pigs fed corn and soybean meal based diet. Animal Nutrition, 1(1), 19–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aninu.2015.02.006
19. Patience, J. F., & Ramirez A. (2022). Invited review: strategic adoption of antibiotic-free pork production: the importance of a holistic approach. Transl Anim Sci., 6(3), txac063. https://doi.org/10.1093/tas/txac063
20. Povod, M. H., Kondratiuk, V. M., Lykhach, V. Y., Mykhalko, O. H., Izhboldina, O. O., Povoznikov, M. H., Hutyi, B. V. (2022). Efektyvnist vykorystannia innovatsiinykh bilkovykh komponentiv u hodivli svynei [Efficiency of using innovative protein components in pig feeding]. Bulletin of Sumy National Agrarian University. The Series: Livestock, 2, 24–35. (in Ukrainian). https://doi.org/10.32845/bsnau.lvst.2022.2.5
21. Povod, M. H., Opara, V. O., Mykhalko, O. H., Hutyi, B. V., Chalyi, O. I., Verbelchuk, T. V., Verbelchuk, S. P., & Koberniuk, V. V. (2023). Efektyvnist vykorystannia vysokobilkovoho soniashnykovoho kontsentratu v rozvedenni svynei v umovakh promyslovoho kompleksu [Efficiency of the use of high-protein sunelower concentrate in the breeding of pigs in the conditions of the industrial complex]. Bulletin of Sumy National Agrarian University. The Series: Livestock, (4), 33–41. (in Ukrainian). https://doi.org/10.32845/bsnau.lvst.2022.4.5
22. Recharla, N., Kim, D., Ramani, S., Song, M., & Park, J. (2019). Balasubramanian B. Dietary multi-enzyme complex improves in vitro nutrient digestibility and hind gut microbial fermentation of pigs. PloS one, 14(5), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0217459
23. Selle, P. H., & Ravindran, V. (2008). Phytate-degrading enzymes in pig nutrition. Livestock Science, 113(2), 99–122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2007.05.014
24. Shurson, G. C., Hung, Y. T., Jang, J. C., & Urriola, P. E. (2021). Measures Matter-Determining the True Nutri- Physiological Value of Feed Ingredients for Swine. Animals (Basel), 11(5), 1259. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11051259
25. Sun, X., Piao, L., Jin, H, Nogoy, KMC., Zhang, J., Sun, B., Jin, Y., Lee, DH., Choi, SH., Smith, SB., & Li, X. (2021). Effects of dietary supplementation of glucose oxidase, catalase, or both on reproductive performance, oxidative stress, fecal microflora and apoptosis in multiparous sows. Anim Biosci, 35(1), 75-86. https://doi.org/10.5713/ab.20.0839
26. Upadhaya, S. D., Yun, H. M., & Kim, I. H. (2016). Influence of low or high-density corn and soybean meal-based diets and protease supplementation on growth performance, apparent digestibility, blood characteristics and noxious gas emission of finishing pigs. Anim Feed Sci Tech., 216, 281–287 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2016.04.003
27. Vahjen, W., Osswald, T., Scha¨fer, K., & Simon, O. (2007). Comparison of a xylanase and a complex of non-starch polysaccharide-degrading enzymes with regard to performance and bacterial metabolism in weaned piglets. Arch Anim Nutr., 61, 90–102. https://doi.org/10.1080/17450390701203881
28. Vyslotska, L., Gutyj, B., Khalak, V., Martyshuk, T., Todoriuk, V., Stadnytska, O., Magrelo, N., Sus, H., Vysotskyi, A., Vus, U., & Magrelo, V. (2021). The level of products of lipid peroxidation in the blood of piglets at the action feed additive “Sylimevit”. Scientific Messenger of LNU of Veterinary Medicine and Biotechnologies. Series: Agricultural Sciences, 23(95), 154–159. https://doi.org/10.32718/nvlvet-a9523
29. Willamil, J., Badiola, I., Devillard, E., Geraert, P. A., & Torrallardona, D. (2012). Wheat-barley-rye-or cornfed growing pigs respond differently to dietary supplementation with a carbohydrase complex. J Anim Sci., 90, 824–32. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2010-3766
30. Wu, Y., Zhao, J., Xu, C., Ma, N., He, T., Zhao, J., Ma, X., & Thacker, PA. (2020). Progress towards pig nutrition in the last 27 years. J Sci Food Agric., 100(14), 5102–5110. https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.9095
31. Yin, F., Zhang, Z., Huang, J., & Yin, Y. (2010). Digestion rate of dietary starch affects systemic circulation of amino acids in weaned pigs. Br J Nutr., 103, 1404–1412. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007114509993321
32. Yin, Y. L., Baidoo, S. K., Schulze, H., & Simmins, PH. (2001). Effects of supplementing diets containing hulless barley varieties having different levels of non-starch polysaccharides with β-glucanase and xylanase on the physiological status of the gastrointestinal tract and nutrient digestibility of weaned pigs. Livest Prod Sci., 71, 97–107. https://doi.org/10.1016/ S0301-6226(01)00214-7
33. Zhang, F., & Adeola, O. (2017). Techniques for evaluating digestibility of energy, amino acids, phosphorus, and calcium in feed ingredients for pigs. Anim Nutr., 3(4), 344. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aninu.2017.06.008
34. Zhang, Q., Widmer, G., & Tzipori, S. (2013). A pig model of the human gastrointestinal tract. Gut Microbes, 4(3), 193–200. https://doi.org/10.4161/gmic.23867
Published
2023-06-16
How to Cite
Popsui, V. V., OparaV. О., Korzh, O. O., & RubtsovI. О. (2023). THE USE OF FEED ENZYME IN THE DIET OF SLOW AND SUCKING SOWS. Bulletin of Sumy National Agrarian University. The Series: Livestock, (2), 33-39. https://doi.org/10.32782/bsnau.lvst.2023.2.5