ПОРІВНЯЛЬНА ОЦІНКА ВПЛИВУ ВИРОЩУВАННЯ ТЕЛИЦЬ І ГОДІВЛІ КОРІВ НА НАДОЇ

V.P. Shablia; I.Yu. Zadorogna; P.V.  Shablia

doi:10.32845/bsnau.lvst.2019.1-2.16

V.P. Shablia Lugansk National Agrarian University https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6510-5397
I.Yu. Zadorogna Institute of Animal Science NAAS https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1723-0297
P.V. Shablia Institute of Animal Science NAAS https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1168-2783

DOI: https://doi.org/10.32845/bsnau.lvst.2019.1-2.16

Keywords: Comparative evaluation of the impact growing heifers and feeding cows on milk yields

Abstract

The results of studies on the influences of heifers growing intensity and the level of feeding cows on milk yields in the highly productive herd of Alfa farm are presented. The mechanisms and patterns of this influence have been clarified. The data for the research were given on milk yields, feed consumption and heifers growing during different periods of farm functioning. In particular, these indicators were monitored in two three-year periods: the previous one - from 2007 to 2009; and the next one - from 2012 to 2014. The dynamics of milking and the main indicators of feeding and growing of young animals for the previous and next periods were analyzed. Using the analysis of variance, the significance of differences between milk yields, the level of growing and feeding in different controlled periods was established, as well as the degree and characteristics of the effects of the period on these indicators. A stepwise multiple regression analysis was used to develop a model for estimating milk yield on cows' feeding rates and heifers' growing intensities, using as a dependent variable annual milk yields, and as independent variables, different feeding and growing indices. It has been found that milk yields for feed cows in Alfa increase over time. Thus, with average milk yields in the previous period (2007-2009) 6062 kg, in the next period (2012-2014 years) they increased to 7838 kg, ie by 1776 kg. The degree of influence of the period on milk yields is η² = 88.2% (p = 0.005). The impact of the considered periods on the average daily increase in heifers is η² = 72.3%. At the same time, the average daily increase of heifers’ live weight changes from 640 g in the previous to 817 g in the next period, or by 27.7% at the significance of difference between the periods (p = 0.032). The dynamics of feed consumption for feeding cows during the analyzed period had a positive trend. In particular, at 2012-2014, the level of cows’ feeding averaged 80.4 centner feed unit per cow per year, and compared to the previous period it increased by 17.2 centner feed unit (27.2%). However, this difference is not significant (p = 0.083). Another important controlled indicator of feeding is the amount of concentrated feed consumed. It was found that the percentage of concentrated feed in the structure of ration increased from 32.6% in the previous to 36.9% in the next period, although this difference (4.6%) is not significant (p = 0.267). An accurate (R² = 0.999) and significant (p = 0.001) regression model for predicting milk yields has been developed based on live weight of heifers at the age of 18-month and proportion of concentrated feeds in rations. The live weight of heifers at age of 18 months has a much greater impact on predicted milk yields than the proportion of concentrated feeds, as recorded by differences in the standardized regression coefficients β for these indicators (0.885 σ_{milk yield} / σ_{live weight} versus 0.230 σ_{milk yield} / σ_{% concentrates}, respectively).

References

1. Lukuyu B.; Gachuiri C.K.; Lukuyu M.N.; Lusweti C. and Mwendia S. (eds). 2012. Feeding dairy cattle in East Africa. East africa Dairy Development project, Nairobi, Kenya. ISBN: 92–9146–272–1
2. Stadnytska O. I. 2011. Vplyv rostu i rozvytku koriv u period vyroshchuvannia na yikh molochnu produktyvnist [Influence of growth and development of cows during the growing period on their milk productivity] // Rozvedennia i henetyka tvaryn. K.: Ahrarna nauka. issue 45. pp. 264–270.
3. Vysoka produktyvnist potrebuie dodatkovoi enerhii [High performance requires extra energy] // Agroexpert. 2013. no. 5 (58). pp. 84–85.
4. Pezzuolo, A.; Chiumenti, A.; Sartori, L. and Borso, F. 2016. Automatic feeding system: evaluation of energy consumption and labour requirement in north-east italy dairy farm. Engineering for rural development, v.25, pp. 882-887.
5. Shablia, V.P. 2018. Comparative assessment of feed preparation technologies for Ukrainian breeds of dairy cows // Boletim de Indústria Animal / Instituto de Zootecnia. Nova Odessa. Brasil. V. 75, pp.1–10. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17523/bia.2018.v75.e1424.
6. Ruban, S.Yu., Perekrestova, A.V. and Shablia, V.P. Metody otsinky efektyvnosti vyrobnytstva moloka korovamy riznykh henetychnykh hrup v umovakh vysokotekhnolohichnoi fermy (chastyna persha) [Methods for evaluating milk production efficiency by cows of different genetic groups in a high-tech farm (Part One)]. Naukovyi visnyk Natsionalnoho universytetu bioresursiv i pryrodokorystuvannia Ukrainy. Seriia «Tekhnolohiia vyrobnytstva i pererobky produktsii tvarynnytstva». issue 271. Kyiv, 2017. pp. 158–176.
7. Shablia, V.P., Shablia, P.V. 2016. Kompiuterna ekonometrychna model tekhnolohii skotarstva [Computer econometric model of livestock technology] // Naukovo-tekhnichnyi biuleten IT NAAN Ukrainy. no. 115. pp. 242-252.
8. Arndt, C.; Powell, J.M.; Aguerre, M.J.; Crump, P.M. and Wattiaux, M.A. 2015. Feed conversion efficiency in dairy cows: Repeatability, variation in digestion and metabolism of energy and nitrogen, and ruminal methanogens. J. Dairy Sci., 98(6), 3938–3950.
9. Ruban, S.Y.; Perekrestova, A.V.; Shablia, V.P.; Bochkov, V.M. 2018. Feed conversion efficiency in different groups of dairy cows. Ukrainian Journal of Ecology, v.8, pp.124–129. doi: 10.15421/2018_196
10. Pershuta, V. V. 2011. Vzaiemozviazok rivnia vyroshchuvannia ta molochnoi produktyvnosti koriv-pervistok [The relationship between the level of production and milk production of first-born cows] // Rozvedennia i henetyka tvaryn. № 45. pp. 192–199.
11. Kuziv, M., Kuziv, N and Fedorovych Ye. 2015. Vplyv zhyvoi masy telyts na molokoproduktyvnist pervistok u period vyroshchuvannia [Influence of live weight of heifers on milk production of firstborn cows during the growing period] // Tvarynntstvo Ukrainy. no. 9. pp. 16–20.
12. Butylo R.I. 2014. Hodivlia yak kliuchovyi orhanizatsiino-ekonomichnyi element v tekhnolohii vyrobnytstva moloka [Feeding as a key organizational and economic element in milk production technology] // Innovatsiina ekonomika. no. 6 (55). pp. 141–145.
13. Khmelnychyi, L. M. and Loboda V.P. 2014. Kharakterystyka remontnykh telyts ukrainskoi chervono-riaboi molochnoi porody za rozvytkom zhyvoi masy [Characteristics of repair heifers of Ukrainian Red-and-White dairy breed by development of live weight] // Visnyk Sumskoho nats. ahr. un-tu, issue 2/2 (25). Sumy, pp. 10–13.
14. Lytvynenko, T. V. 2010.Vikovi zminy intensyvnosti rostu remontnykh telyts holshtynskoi porody [Age-related changes in the growth rate of Holstein breeding heifers] // Visnyk SNAU. Seriia Tvarynnytstvo. no. 12. pp. 73–75.
15. Maekawa, M; Beauchemin; K.A. and Christensen, D.A. Effect of concentrate level and feeding management on chewing activities, saliva production, and ruminal pH of lactating dairy cows. J Dairy Sci. 2002 May; 85(5):1165-75. DOI: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(02)74179-9
16. Duzhak, A. 2012. Yakist kormiv zadaie ton efektyvnii hodivli [Feed quality sets the tone for effective feeding] // Propozytsiia. no. 1. pp. 117–118.