Evaluation of stud boars of modern genotypes based on their sperm productivity
Keywords:
stud boars; ejaculate; sperm mobility; sperm production; reproduction; parent; terminal line
Abstract
The article examines the sperm production performance of Landrace and Yorkshire boars, boars of UVB-3 intrabreed type and MaxGrow, MaxTer, and OptiMus synthetic lines. It was found that boars of UVB-3 intrabreed type were the best in terms of sperm concentration, as it exceeded values obtained from the other study groups by 27.5-82.1 million/ml. It was found that MaxTer terminal boars had rather high sperm concentration, 286.6 ± 6.00 million/ml, with sperm mobility of 8.7 points, and produced the highest number of semen doses - 30.0 ± 0.71 pcs. Ejaculate from MaxGrow boars was the largest in volume (p ≤ 0.001) and exceeded that from boars of UVB-3 intrabreed type by 63.2 ml (17.9 %). Landrace boars produced the large-volume ejaculate but their sperm concentration was rather low. Evaluation of the reproductive qualities of boars based on the fertility of sows inseminated with their sperm showed that the most fertile were sows which were inseminated with sperm from terminal boars of synthetic lines. The terminal boars of MaxGrow, MaxTer, and OptiMus lines had a significant advantage in sperm quality, and thus they can be used more effectively as recurrent parents to obtain commercial hybrids.
References
1. Bazhov, G.M., and Komlatskiy. V.I., 1989. Biotekhnologiya intensivnogo svinovodstva [Intensive pig farming biotechnology]. Rosagropromizdat, pp. 115-118.
2. Herasymov V.I., Baranovskyi D.I., Khokhlov A.M., Rybalko V.P., and Zasukha Yu.V., 2010. Tekhnolohiia vyrobnytstva produktsii svynarstva [Production technology of pig production] Kharkiv: Espada, рр. 448
3. Instruction on artificial insemination of pigs, 2003. Kyiv: Ahrarna nauka, рр. 56.
4. Kravchenko O.O., and Melnyk V.O.,2010. Vidtvoriuvalna zdatnist knuriv-plidnykiv riznykh henotypiv [Reproductive ability of boar boar of different genotypes]. Visnyk Ahrarnoï nauky Prychornomoria, issue 4, рр. 209-211.
5. Mammontov N.T., Mikhail N.V., and Sharnin V.N., 2009. Prakticheskie sovety po soderzhaniju hrjakov-proizvoditelej [Practical advice on the content of cartilage-producers]. Svinovodstvo, issue 7, рр.28-30.
6. Narizhnyj A.G., Vodjannikov V.I., and Pomorova E.G.,2001. Povyshenie produktivnosti hrjakov [Increase in efficiency of male pigs]. Belgorod, рр. 208
7. Pohodnja G.S., 2004. Iskusstvennoe osemenenie svinomatok [Artificial insemination of sows]. Belgorod, рр. 28.
8. Pohodnja G.S., and Malahova T.A., 2016. Stimuljacija vosproizvoditel'noj funkcii u svinomatok [Stimulation of reproduction function in sows]. Belgorod, рр. 204.
9. Tur'janskij A.V., Pohodnja G.S., and Breslavec A.P., 2015. Organizacija, tehnologija i jeffektivnost' proizvodstva svininy v fermerskih hozjajstvah [Organization, technology and efficiency of pork production in farms]. Belgorod, рр. 264.
10. Fedorenkova L., Yanovich, O., Batkovs'kaya, T., and Mal'chevskaya, A., 2013. Kachestvo spermy khryakov [Boar semen quality]. Zhivotnovodstvo Rossii. Spetsvypusk: pp. 32.
11. Shaferivskyi B.S., 2012. Produktyvnist knuriv zarubizhnoho pokhodzhennia [Performance of boars of foreign origin]. Visnyk Poltavskoi derzhavnoi ahrarnoi akademii, no. 4, рр. 169-172.
12. Yablonskyi V.A., 2002. Praktychne akusherstvo, hinekolohiia ta biotekhnolohiia vidtvorennia tvaryn z osnovamy androlohii [Practical obstetrics, gynecology and biotechnology for reproduction of animals with the basics of andrology]. Kyiv: Meta, рр. 319.
13. Arsenakis I., Appeltant R., Sarrazin S., Rijsselaere T., Van Soom, A., and Maes, D., 2017. Relationship between semen quality and meat quality traits in Belgian Piétrain boars. Livestock Science, 205, 36–42.
14. Hacker, R. R., Du, Z., and D’arcy, C. J., 1994. Influence of penning type and feeding level on sexual behavior and feetand leg soundness in boars. Journal of Animal Science, 72(10), 2531–2537. doi:10.2527/1994.72102531x
15. Oh, S.H., See M.T., Long T.E., and Galvin J.M., 2006. Genetic parameters for various random regression models to describe total sperm cells per ejaculate over the reproductive lifetime of boars. Journal of Animal Science, 84, 538–545.
16. Pruneda, A., Pinart, E., DolorsBriz, M., Sancho, S., Garcia-Gil, N., Badia, E., and Bonet, S., 2005. Effects of a highsemen-collection frequency on the quality of sperm frome jaculate sand from sixpididy malregi on sin boars. Theriogenology, 63 (8), 2219–2232. doi:10.1016/j.theriogenology.2004.10.009
17. Ren, B., Cheng, X., Wu, D., Xu, S.-Y., Che, L.-Q., Fang, Z.-F., and Lin, Y., 2015. Effect of different aminoacid patterns on semen quality of boars fedwithlow-proteindiets. Animal Reproduction Science, 161, 96–103. doi:10.1016/j.anireprosci.2015.08.010
18. Riesenbeck, A., Schulze, M., Rüdiger, K., Henning, H., and Waberski, D., 2015. Quality Control of Boar Sperm Processing: Implications from European AI Centresand Two Spermatology Reference Laboratories. Reproduction in Domestic Animals, 50, 1–4. doi:10.1111/rda.12573
19. Rodríguez, A. L., Rijsselaere, T., Vyt, P., Van Soom, A., and Maes, D., 2011. Effect of Dilution Temperatureon Boar Semen Quality. Reproductionin Domestic Animals, 47(5), e63–e66. doi:10.1111/j.1439-0531.2011.01938.x
20. Rodriguez, A.L., Van Soom, A., Arsenakis, I., and Maes, D., 2017. Boar management and semen handling factors affect the quality of boar extended semen. Porcine Health Management, 3(1). doi:10.1186/s40813-017-0062-5
21. Sancho, S., Rodríguez-Gil, J. E., Pinart, E., Briz, M., Garcia-Gil, N., Badia, E., and Bonet, S., 2006. Effects of exposing boars to different artificial light regimens on semen plasmamarker sand “invivo” fertilizing capacity. Theriogenology, 65(2), 317–331. doi:10.1016/j.theriogenology.2005.05.03
22. Schulze, M., Ammon, C., Rüdiger, K., Jung, M., and Grobbel, M., 2015. Analysis of hygienic critical control point sin boar semen production. Theriogenology, 83(3), 430–437. doi:10.1016/j.theriogenology.2014.10.004
23. Schulze, M., Buder, S., Rüdiger, K., Beyerbach, M., and Waberski, D., 2014. Influences on semen traitsused for selection of young AI boars. Animal Reproduction Science, 148 (3-4), 164–170. doi:10.1016/j.anireprosci.2014.06.008
24. Vyt P, Maes D, Rijsselaere T, Dewulf J, de Kruif A, and Van Soom A., 2007. Semen handling in porcineartificialin semination centres: the Belgiansituation. Vlaams Diergeneeskundig Tijdschrift, 76:195–200
25. Wolf, J., and Smital, J., 2009. Effect singenetic evaluation for sementraitsin Czech Large White and Czech Landrace boars. Czech Journal of Animal Science, 54 (No.8), 349–358. doi:10.17221/1658-cjas
2. Herasymov V.I., Baranovskyi D.I., Khokhlov A.M., Rybalko V.P., and Zasukha Yu.V., 2010. Tekhnolohiia vyrobnytstva produktsii svynarstva [Production technology of pig production] Kharkiv: Espada, рр. 448
3. Instruction on artificial insemination of pigs, 2003. Kyiv: Ahrarna nauka, рр. 56.
4. Kravchenko O.O., and Melnyk V.O.,2010. Vidtvoriuvalna zdatnist knuriv-plidnykiv riznykh henotypiv [Reproductive ability of boar boar of different genotypes]. Visnyk Ahrarnoï nauky Prychornomoria, issue 4, рр. 209-211.
5. Mammontov N.T., Mikhail N.V., and Sharnin V.N., 2009. Prakticheskie sovety po soderzhaniju hrjakov-proizvoditelej [Practical advice on the content of cartilage-producers]. Svinovodstvo, issue 7, рр.28-30.
6. Narizhnyj A.G., Vodjannikov V.I., and Pomorova E.G.,2001. Povyshenie produktivnosti hrjakov [Increase in efficiency of male pigs]. Belgorod, рр. 208
7. Pohodnja G.S., 2004. Iskusstvennoe osemenenie svinomatok [Artificial insemination of sows]. Belgorod, рр. 28.
8. Pohodnja G.S., and Malahova T.A., 2016. Stimuljacija vosproizvoditel'noj funkcii u svinomatok [Stimulation of reproduction function in sows]. Belgorod, рр. 204.
9. Tur'janskij A.V., Pohodnja G.S., and Breslavec A.P., 2015. Organizacija, tehnologija i jeffektivnost' proizvodstva svininy v fermerskih hozjajstvah [Organization, technology and efficiency of pork production in farms]. Belgorod, рр. 264.
10. Fedorenkova L., Yanovich, O., Batkovs'kaya, T., and Mal'chevskaya, A., 2013. Kachestvo spermy khryakov [Boar semen quality]. Zhivotnovodstvo Rossii. Spetsvypusk: pp. 32.
11. Shaferivskyi B.S., 2012. Produktyvnist knuriv zarubizhnoho pokhodzhennia [Performance of boars of foreign origin]. Visnyk Poltavskoi derzhavnoi ahrarnoi akademii, no. 4, рр. 169-172.
12. Yablonskyi V.A., 2002. Praktychne akusherstvo, hinekolohiia ta biotekhnolohiia vidtvorennia tvaryn z osnovamy androlohii [Practical obstetrics, gynecology and biotechnology for reproduction of animals with the basics of andrology]. Kyiv: Meta, рр. 319.
13. Arsenakis I., Appeltant R., Sarrazin S., Rijsselaere T., Van Soom, A., and Maes, D., 2017. Relationship between semen quality and meat quality traits in Belgian Piétrain boars. Livestock Science, 205, 36–42.
14. Hacker, R. R., Du, Z., and D’arcy, C. J., 1994. Influence of penning type and feeding level on sexual behavior and feetand leg soundness in boars. Journal of Animal Science, 72(10), 2531–2537. doi:10.2527/1994.72102531x
15. Oh, S.H., See M.T., Long T.E., and Galvin J.M., 2006. Genetic parameters for various random regression models to describe total sperm cells per ejaculate over the reproductive lifetime of boars. Journal of Animal Science, 84, 538–545.
16. Pruneda, A., Pinart, E., DolorsBriz, M., Sancho, S., Garcia-Gil, N., Badia, E., and Bonet, S., 2005. Effects of a highsemen-collection frequency on the quality of sperm frome jaculate sand from sixpididy malregi on sin boars. Theriogenology, 63 (8), 2219–2232. doi:10.1016/j.theriogenology.2004.10.009
17. Ren, B., Cheng, X., Wu, D., Xu, S.-Y., Che, L.-Q., Fang, Z.-F., and Lin, Y., 2015. Effect of different aminoacid patterns on semen quality of boars fedwithlow-proteindiets. Animal Reproduction Science, 161, 96–103. doi:10.1016/j.anireprosci.2015.08.010
18. Riesenbeck, A., Schulze, M., Rüdiger, K., Henning, H., and Waberski, D., 2015. Quality Control of Boar Sperm Processing: Implications from European AI Centresand Two Spermatology Reference Laboratories. Reproduction in Domestic Animals, 50, 1–4. doi:10.1111/rda.12573
19. Rodríguez, A. L., Rijsselaere, T., Vyt, P., Van Soom, A., and Maes, D., 2011. Effect of Dilution Temperatureon Boar Semen Quality. Reproductionin Domestic Animals, 47(5), e63–e66. doi:10.1111/j.1439-0531.2011.01938.x
20. Rodriguez, A.L., Van Soom, A., Arsenakis, I., and Maes, D., 2017. Boar management and semen handling factors affect the quality of boar extended semen. Porcine Health Management, 3(1). doi:10.1186/s40813-017-0062-5
21. Sancho, S., Rodríguez-Gil, J. E., Pinart, E., Briz, M., Garcia-Gil, N., Badia, E., and Bonet, S., 2006. Effects of exposing boars to different artificial light regimens on semen plasmamarker sand “invivo” fertilizing capacity. Theriogenology, 65(2), 317–331. doi:10.1016/j.theriogenology.2005.05.03
22. Schulze, M., Ammon, C., Rüdiger, K., Jung, M., and Grobbel, M., 2015. Analysis of hygienic critical control point sin boar semen production. Theriogenology, 83(3), 430–437. doi:10.1016/j.theriogenology.2014.10.004
23. Schulze, M., Buder, S., Rüdiger, K., Beyerbach, M., and Waberski, D., 2014. Influences on semen traitsused for selection of young AI boars. Animal Reproduction Science, 148 (3-4), 164–170. doi:10.1016/j.anireprosci.2014.06.008
24. Vyt P, Maes D, Rijsselaere T, Dewulf J, de Kruif A, and Van Soom A., 2007. Semen handling in porcineartificialin semination centres: the Belgiansituation. Vlaams Diergeneeskundig Tijdschrift, 76:195–200
25. Wolf, J., and Smital, J., 2009. Effect singenetic evaluation for sementraitsin Czech Large White and Czech Landrace boars. Czech Journal of Animal Science, 54 (No.8), 349–358. doi:10.17221/1658-cjas
Published
2019-09-30
How to Cite
Khramkova, O., & Povod, M. (2019). Evaluation of stud boars of modern genotypes based on their sperm productivity. Bulletin of Sumy National Agrarian University. The Series: Livestock, (3 (38), 91-95. https://doi.org/10.32845/bsnau.lvst.2019.3.11
Section
Articles
ISSN 
ISSN 
