The influence of milk production technology on its quality and safety

DOI: https://doi.org/10.32845/bsnau.vet.2020.4.3
Keywords: microclimate, milk, hydrogen sulfide, ammonia, relative humidity, total bacterial contamination, air velocity, carbon dioxide, cows, mastitis

Abstract

In the article, the authors have studied a significant amount of literature related to milk production technology. Under modern conditions of milk production there is a necessary need to study a set of preventive measures. Which would allow to make full use of genetic potential of animals and at the same time to keep health and to receive qualitative and safe production from them. At present, there is a large amount of technological news, which is aimed at obtaining the highest productivity at the lowest cost. The use of industrial technologies often does not take into account the natural needs of animals, which are scientifically sound to meet a certain physiological group. The authors conducted a parallel study of three milk production technologies with different systems of keeping cows. The article presents data on the sanitary and hygienic condition of the farm in milk production using traditional and the latest technology. In this work, studies of the microclimate in the premises for cows and its impact on the quality and safety of milk were conducted. Our research has shown that the quality and safety of milk directly depends on the technology of its production. With the use of the latest milk production technology, the number of somatic cells and total milk contamination did not exceed 221.1 thousand / cm3 and 70.8 CFU thousand / cm3, respectively. However, it was found that with the use of the latest technology of milk production in the winter time, the room temperature can drop to -10 0C, but this does not lead to an increase in mastitis and respiratory diseases. The incidence of mastitis in cows does not exceed 6.4 percent, which is one of the best indicators.

References

1. Andrievskyi, V.Y., Kostenko, O.I., Ostapiuk, M.P., Kasianchuk, V.V., Skliar, O.I., 2013. Quality management systems. Milk. Calculation of somatic cells. Part 1. Microscope method (control method) (ISO 13366-1: 2008 IDF 148-1:2008): DSTU ISO 13366-1: 2008. Kyiv: State Consumer Standard of Ukraine, 12.
2. Arulraj, P., Asarudheen, I., Jasmin, T., Mohammed, Sarfas, Sahnas, N.K., Vedha, Satheesh, Venkatanarayanan, R., 2015. Dairy bacteriology and microbial analysis of milk using syringe filter. European Journal of Biomedical and Pharmaceutical Sciences 2, 380-388.
3. Busato, A., Trachsel, P., Schallibaum, M., Blum, J.W., 2000. Udder health and risk factors for subclinical mastitis in organic dairy farms in Switzerland. Preventive Veterinary Medicine 44, 205-220. [CrossRef]. DOI: 10.1016/s0167-5877(00)00104-5
4. Dorofeev, O. V. and Buncev, V. E. (2015), “The role of staff in ensuring competitive advantages of the agrarian enterprose”, Antropologihni aspekty upravlinnia suhasnym pidpryemstvom : vseukrainska naukovo-praktyhna Internet-konferenzia [Anthropological aspects of management of a modern enterprise : Ukrainian scientific and practical Internet-conference], PDAA, Poltava, Ukraine.
5. Dufour, S., Frechette, A., Barkema, H.W., Mussell, A., Scholl, D.T., 2011. Invited review: effect of udder health management practices on herd somatic cell count. Journal of Dairy Sciences 94, 563-579. [CrossRef]. DOI: 10.3168/jds.2010-3715
6. Hulich, M.P. (2011), “Balanced diet and healthy lifestyle − key factors maintaining the health of the population”, Problemy starenyia y dolholetyia, vol. 2, pp. 128−132
7. Hussain, R., Javed, M.T., Khan, A., 2012. Changes in some biochemical parameters and somatic cell counts in the milk of buffalo and cattle suffering from mastitis. Pakistan Veterinary Journal 32, 418-421.
8. Joshi, S., Gokhale, S., 2006. Status of mastitis as an emerging disease in improved and periurban dairy farms in India. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 1081, 74-83. [CrossRef]. DOI: 10.1196/annals.1373.007
9. Kernasyuk, Y. (2015), “Robotized cow milking: recoupment of investments”, Online, availableat : http://www.agro-bisiness.com.ua/suchasne-tvarynnytstvo/3978.html (Accessed 15 Oct 2017).
10. Kostenko, V. (2013), “Milking of cows, evaluation and selection of firstlings”, [Online], available at: http://www.agro-bisiness.com.ua/suchasne-tvarynnytstvo/1530.html (Accessed 15 Oct 2017)
11. Kostenko, V. (2015), “Economy of milk production”, [Online], available at : http://www.agro-bisiness.com.ua/suchasne-tvarynnytstvo/3171.html (Accessed 15 Oct 2017).
12. Kyryliuk, I. (2016), “Current approaches to guarantee the quality and safety of animal products in the EU”, Efektyvna ekonomika, vol. 12, available at: http:// http://www.economy.nayka.com.ua/?op=1&z=5330 (Accessed 03 Sep 2017)
13. Lelieveld, H.L.M., Holah, J., Gabric, D., 2016. Handbook of Hygiene Control in the Food Industry, (Woodhead Publishing Series in Food Science, Technology and Nutrition), 2nd Edition, Woodhead Publishing.
14. Livestock Production Technology (2005), “Milking of cows”, [Online], available at : http://buklib.net/books/34166/ (Accessed 15 Oct 2017).
15. Lucenko, M. and Zvoleyko, D. (2012), “Research of the process of milking cows in the specialized milking parlours”,Technika i technologyi v APK, , vol. 9(36), pp. 31–34.
16. Lucenko, M. and Zvoleyko, D. (2013), “Efficiency of using robotized milking systems”, Technika i technologyi v APK, , vol. 5(44), pp. 13–15.
17. Ma, Y., Ryan, C., Barbano, D.M., Galton, D.M., Rudan, M.A., Boor, K.J., 2000. Effects of somatic cell count on quality and shelf-life of pasteurized fluid milk. Journal of Dairy Sciences 83, 264-274. [CrossRef]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(00)74873-9
18. Shkromada, O., Palii, A., Palii, A., Skliar, O., Dudchenko, Y., & Necherya, T. (2019). Improvement of milk quality for micro-climate formation on cattle farms. Bulletin of Sumy National Agrarian University. The Series: Veterinary Medicine, (4 (47), 43-49. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32845/bsnau.vet.2019.4.7
19. Mankiewicz, R., 2004. The Story of Mathematics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
20. Marshall, R.T., 1992. Standard Methods for the Examination of Dairy Products, 16th ed. American Public Health Association, Washington, DC.
21. Murphy, S.C., Boor, K.J., 2000. Trouble-shooting sources and causes of high bacteria counts in raw milk. Dairy, Food and Environmental Sanitation 8, 606-611.
22. Otenko, V. I. (2014), “Competitive advantages of business activities”, Biznes inform, , vol. 4 (435), pp. 290–295.
23. Smolar, V.I. (2013), “Formula nutrition”, Problemy kharchuvannia, vol. 2, pp. 5−9.
24. Zamoyski, K. Zamoyski, C. Wilczynski, J. and Chorna, O. (2014), “Nutrition students”, Naukovi zapysky: Pedahohichni nauky, vol. 132, pp. 319−323.
Published
2020-12-28
How to Cite
Gerun, I., Skliar, O., & Musienko, O. (2020). The influence of milk production technology on its quality and safety. Bulletin of Sumy National Agrarian University. The Series: Veterinary Medicine, (4 (51), 17-22. https://doi.org/10.32845/bsnau.vet.2020.4.3
Issue
No. 4 (51) (2020): Bulletin of Sumy National Agrarian University. The series: Veterinary Medicine
Section
Veterinary medicine
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.