EVALUATION OF THE DISINFECTION EFFECTIVENESS OF THE SUHODEZ DISINFECTANT
Abstract
Disinfestation treatment is one of the key links along with the administration of anti-Eimeriosis drugs in the fight against poultry Eimeriosis. For the effective use of disinfectants against eimeria, their constant change and rotation by active substances is important in order to prevent the emergence of the phenomenon of resistance in eimeria. The article provides data on the development of means of combating poultry eimeriosis using the disinfectant Sukhodez. The disinfectant produced by the domestic research and production company «Brovafarma» contains chloramine, thymol, copper sulfate, iron sulfate, calcium sulfate dihydrate, zeolite, kaolin, flavoring. During the experiments, the effectiveness of the indicated agent on Eimeria tenella oocysts was checked in concentrations from 0.5 to 3.0% for exposures from 10 minutes to 4 hours. For studies aimed at determining the effectiveness of the disinfectant on Eimeria tenella oocysts, material samples were taken from Rhode Island chickens aged 9-12 months from homesteads of residents of the Sumy district. Laboratory studies of poultry droppings using the Fülleborn method were used to establish a diagnosis of eimeriosis. To determine the indicator of disinfestation efficiency, 10-15 specimens of Eimeria tenella oocysts were placed in Petri dishes, Sukhodez solution of the appropriate concentration was added, and they served as the corresponding research groups. Petri dishes with the addition of the same amount of oocysts served as controls, but instead of the disinfectant solution, 5 cm3 of distilled water was added to them. When the exposure time was over, the cups with oocysts were washed five times and the samples for sporulation were transferred to a thermostat, where they were kept for five days at a temperature of 26°C, with daily monitoring of the moisture level. The use of a 2.5% concentration of Sukhodez provided a disinfestation effect after exposure for 60 minutes, in turn, a 3% concentration of the disinfectant caused a violation of the integrity of eimeria after exposure for 30 minutes, a similar effect was noted at a longer exposure, which indicates the effectiveness of the disinfectant Sukhodez. Accordingly, the disinfectant Sukhodez in the studied concentrations (2-3%) slows down and completely stops the development of Eimeria tenella oocysts and causes their further lysis and thus can be recommended for use in production.
References
2. Angus, K. W., Sherwood, D., Hutchison, G., & Campbell, I. (1982). Evaluation of the effect of two aldehydebased disinfectants on the infectivity of faecal cryptosporidia for mice. Research in veterinary science, 33(3), 379–381.
3. Ayeni, A. O., Dingeldein, E., & Dürr, U. (1972). Studies on the inactivation of coccidian oocysts. Acta veterinaria Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae, 22(1), 111–122.
4. Berezovskiy, A. V. & Fotina, G. A. (2007). Viznachennya parametriv toksichnosti novogo dezinfektantu «Brovadezplyus» [Determination of toxicity parameters of the new disinfectant «Brovadez-plus»]. Naukovo-tehnichniy byuleten IBT UAAN I DNDKI vet. preparatIv ta korm. dobavok. LvIv, 8, V. 3–4. S. 326–330. [in Ukrainian].
5. Blake, D. P., Knox, J., Dehaeck, B., Huntington, B., Rathinam, T., Ravipati, V., Ayoade, S., Gilbert, W., Adebambo, A. O., Jatau, I. D., Raman, M., Parker, D., Rushton, J., & Tomley, F. M. (2020). Re-calculating the cost of coccidiosis in chickens. Veterinary research, 51(1), 115. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13567-020-00837-2
6. Campbell, I., Tzipori, A. S., Hutchison, G., & Angus, K. W. (1982). Effect of disinfectants on survival of cryptosporidium oocysts. The Veterinary record, 111(18), 414–415. https://doi.org/10.1136/vr.111.18.414
7. Dakhno, I.S., Berezovskyi, A.V., Halat, V.F., Aranchii, S.V. (2001). Atlas helmintiv tvaryn [Atlas of animal helminths] K.: Vetinform, 2001. 117 s. [in Ukrainian].
8. Daugschies, A., Agneessens, J., Goossens, L., Mengel, H., & Veys, P. (2007). The effect of a metaphylactic treatment with diclazuril (Vecoxan) on the oocyst excretion and growth performance of calves exposed to a natural Eimeria infection. Veterinary parasitology, 149(3-4), 199–206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vetpar.2007.08.003
9. Daugschies, A., Böse, R., Marx, J., Teich, K., & Friedhoff, K. T. (2002). Development and application of a standardized assay for chemical disinfection of coccidia oocysts. Veterinary parasitology, 103(4), 299–308. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0304-4017(01)00581-7
10. DovgIy M. Yu. (2017). Efektivnist dezinvaziynih vlastivostey dezinfikuyuchih zasobiv pri gelmintozno-protozoyniy invaziyi u silskogospodarskoyi ptitsi. [Effectiveness of disinfestation properties of disinfectants in case of helminthicprotozoan infestation in poultry]. Visnik Zhitomirskogo natsIonalnogo agroekologichnogo universitetu, 3. # 2 (63). S. 63–66. [in Ukrainian].
11. Fayer R. (1995). Effect of sodium hypochlorite exposure on infectivity of Cryptosporidium parvum oocysts for neonatal BALB/c mice. Applied and environmental microbiology, 61(2), 844–846. https://doi.org/10.1128/aem.61.2.844-846.1995
12. Fayer, R., C. A. Speer, & J. P. Dubey (1997). The general biology of Cryptosporidium, p. 1-41. In R. Fayer (ed.), Cryptosporidium and cryptosporidiosis. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.
13. Grier N. (1979). Synthesis and antimicrobial evaluation of quaternary salts of 4-phenyl-1,2,3,6-tetrahydropyridine and 3,6-dimethyl-6-phenyl-tetrahydro-2H-1,3-oxazine. Journal of pharmaceutical sciences, 68(4), 407–411. https://doi.org/10.1002/jps.2600680404
14. Guimarães, J. S., Jr, Bogado, A. L., da Cunha, T. C., & Garcia, J. L. (2007). In vitro evaluation of the disinfection efficacy on Eimeria tenella unsporulated oocysts isolated from broilers. Revista brasileira de parasitologia veterinaria = Brazilian journal of veterinary parasitology : Orgao Oficial do Colegio Brasileiro de Parasitologia Veterinaria, 16(2), 67–71.
15. Györke, A., Kalmár, Z., Pop, L. M., & Şuteu, O. L. (2016). The economic impact of infection with Eimeria spp. in broiler farms from Romania. Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia, 45, 273-280.
16. Haug, A., Thebo, P., & Mattsson, J. G. (2007). A simplified protocol for molecular identification of Eimeria species in field samples. Veterinary parasitology, 146(1-2), 35–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vetpar.2006.12.015
17. Hilbrich P. (1975). Desinfektionsversuche an Eimeria-tenella-Oozysten [Disinfection tests on Eimeria tenella oocytes]. Berliner und Munchener tierarztliche Wochenschrift, 88(8), 144–148. [in German]
18. Hunko, O., & Fotina, T. (2022). Vyznachennia hostroi toksychnosti protyprotozoinoho preparatu «Avizuryl» [Determination of acute toxicity of antiprotozoal drug «Avizuril»]. Naukovyi visnyk LNU veterynarnoi medytsyny ta biotekhnolohii. Seriia: Veterynarni nauky, 24(106), 136-141. https://doi.org/10.32718/nvlvet10621. [in Ukrainian].
19. Jenkins, M. B., Bowman, D. D., & Ghiorse, W. C. (1998). Inactivation of Cryptosporidium parvum Oocysts by Ammonia. Applied and environmental microbiology, 64(2), 784–788. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.64.2.784-788.1998
20. Korich, D. G., Mead, J. R., Madore, M. S., Sinclair, N. A., & Sterling, C. R. (1990). Effects of ozone, chlorine dioxide, chlorine, and monochloramine on Cryptosporidium parvum oocyst viability. Applied and environmental microbiology, 56(5), 1423–1428. https://doi.org/10.1128/aem.56.5.1423-1428.1990
21. McDonnell, G., & Russell, A. D. (1999). Antiseptics and disinfectants: activity, action, and resistance. Clinical microbiology reviews, 12(1), 147–179. https://doi.org/10.1128/CMR.12.1.147
22. Noack, S., Chapman, H. D., & Selzer, P. M. (2019). Anticoccidial drugs of the livestock industry. Parasitology research, 118(7), 2009–2026. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00436-019-06343-5
23. Pavlásek I. (1984). Ucinek dezinfekcních prostredků na infekceschopnost oocyst Cryptosporidium sp [The effect of disinfectants on the infectivity of Cryptosporidium sp. oocysts]. Ceskoslovenska epidemiologie, mikrobiologie, imunologie, 33(2), 97–101. [in Czech]
24. Peek, H. W., & Landman, W. J. (2011). Coccidiosis in poultry: anticoccidial products, vaccines and other prevention strategies. The veterinary quarterly, 31(3), 143–161. https://doi.org/10.1080/01652176.2011.605247
25. Radičević, T., Janković, S., Stefanović, S., Nikolić, D., Đinović-Stojanović, J., & Spirić, D. (2017, September). Coccidiostats in unmedicated feedingstuffs for poultry. In IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science (Vol. 85, No. 1, p. 012080). IOP Publishing.
26. Rehman, T. U., Khan, M. N., Sajid, M. S., Abbas, R. Z., Arshad, M., Iqbal, Z., & Iqbal, A. (2011). Epidemiology of Eimeria and associated risk factors in cattle of district Toba Tek Singh, Pakistan. Parasitology research, 108(5), 1171–1177. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00436-010-2159-5
27. Weir, S. C., Pokorny, N. J., Carreno, R. A., Trevors, J. T., & Lee, H. (2002). Efficacy of common laboratory disinfectants on the infectivity of Cryptosporidium parvum oocysts in cell culture. Applied and environmental microbiology, 68(5), 2576–2579. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.68.5.2576-2579.2002
28. Williams, R.B. (1997). Laboratory tests of phenolic disinfectants as oocysticides against the chicken coccidium Eimeria tenella. The Veterinary record, 141(17), 447–448. https://doi.org/10.1136/vr.141.17.447
29. You, M.J. (2014). Suppression of Eimeria tenella sporulation by disinfectants. The Korean journal of parasitology, 52(4), 435–438. https://doi.org/10.3347/kjp.2014.52.4.435
30. Zaman, M.A., Iqbal, Z., Abbas, R.Z., & Khan, M.N. (2012). Anticoccidial activity of herbal complex in broiler chickens challenged with Eimeria tenella. Parasitology, 139(2), 237–243. https://doi.org/10.1017/S003118201100182X
ISSN 
ISSN 
