Methodological aspects of evaluation of ornamental woody plants of the Magnoliophyta division according the complex of morphological signs and signs of vitality

Keywords: arboretum, trunk and crown architectonics, species taxon, landscape architecture, landscape design, garden and park art, scale of decorativeness evaluation.

Abstract

For the first time, a comprehensive assessment of the decorativeness of woody plants at the level of the Magnoliophyta department was considered. Methodologically organized group of features that directly shape the decorativeness of woody plants (trunk and crown architectonics with or without leaf cover; hereditary typical crown form with possible adaptation options; texture and color of the bark, frame branches and shoots of the crown; size, color and duration of leaf viability; size and color of flowers and inflorescences, as well as the abundance and duration of their flowering; decorative attractiveness and storage life of fruits and inflorescences; aroma of bark and leaves, flowers and inflorescences, fruits and compound fruit odors) and a group of indirectly influential indicators of decorativeness (damage unpredictable “negatives” of woody plants living condition; winter hardiness the resistance of woody plants and a set of unfavorable conditions in winter; frost resistance an indicator of frost impact on woody plants in winter) woody plants of Magnoliophyta division.

Particular attention is focused on the use of our 5-point scales that we have developed for assessing the decorativeness of woody plants on 12 morphological characteristics (trunk and crown architectonics, crown shape, bark color, leaf size (needles), leaf color, leaf viability, flower and inflorescences size, flowers and inflorescences color, duration of flowering, fruits and compound fruits attractiveness, fruits and compound fruits storage, aroma of odors) and 3 indicators of living condition (damage) and natural conditions of habitats (winter hardiness, frost resistance) of woody plants.

It is shown by the example of Betula pendula Roth. that the living condition of trees, bushes and climbing lianas of the Magnoliophyta division most typically manifests itself in the virginal, young, medieval and older generative stages of ontogenesis. At this time of growth and development, species taxa with their appearance, as a rule, are aesthetically positive and emotionally elevated perceived by most people. These stages of flowering woody plants ontogenesis are marked by a rather high, if not maximum decorativeness.

References

1. Kolesnikov, A. I. (2018). Dekorativnaya dendrologiya [Decorative dendrology]. Zolotye stranitsy, Kharkov (in Russian).
2. Rubtsov, L. I. (1977) Derevya i kustarniki v landshaftnoy arkhitekture. [Trees and shrubs in landscape architecture]. Nauk. dumka, Kyiv (in Ukrainian).
3. Runova, Ye. M. & Gnatkovich, P.S. (2014). Otsenka dekorativnosti drevesno-kustarnikovykh introdutsentov chastnykh sadov goroda Bratska [Assessment of the decorativeness of tree and shrub introductions of private gardens in the city of Bratsk]. Sistemy. Metody. Tekhnologii, 136–140 (in Russian).
4. Kotelova, N. V. & Vinogradova, O. N. (1974). Otsenka dekorativnosti derevyev i kustarnikov po sezonam goda [As-sessment of trees and shrubs decorativeness by seasons]. Fiziologiya i selektsiya rasteny i ozeleneniye gorodov. MLTI, Mos-cow, 37–44 (in Russian).
5. Kokhanovskyi, V. M. & Kovalenko, I. M. (2013). Dekoratyvna dendrolohiia Navchalnyi posibnyk. Chastyna 2. Mag-noliophita [Decorative dendrology. Tutorial. Part 2. Magnoliophita]. Sumy: Sumy National Agrarian University, 284 (in Ukraini-an).
6. Melnyk, T. I. & Melnyk, A. V. (2013). Vydovyi sklad I kilkisna uchast derevnykh porid u vulychnykh nasadshenniakh mista Sumy [Species composition and quantitative participation of tree species in street plantations of Sumy]. Naukovyi visnyk NUBIP Ukrainy. Ser.: Lisivnytstvo ta dekoratyvne sadivnytstvo, 187(3), 45–55 (in Ukrainian).
7. Kovalenko, I. M. (2018). Lisova ekolohiia z osnovamy lisovidnovlennia ta lisorozvedennia [Forest ecology with the basics of reforestation and afforestation]. PF Vydavnytstvo “Universytetska knyha”, Sumy (in Ukrainian).
8. Kokhanovskyi, V. M., Melnyk, T. I., Kovalenko, I. M. & Melnyk, A. V. (2020). Dekoratyvna dendrolohiia. Navchalnyi posibnyk. Chastyna 1. Morpholohiia roslyn. Pinophyta (Holonasinni) [Decorative dendrology. Tutorial. Part 1. Morphology of plants. Pinophyta (Gymnosperms)]. Kollash–Prynt, Sumy (in Ukrainian).
9. Smirnova, O. V. & Bobrovsky, M. V. (2001). Ontogenez dereva i ego otrazheniye v strukture i dinamike rastitelnogo pokrova [Ontogenesis of a tree and its reflection in the structure and dynamics of the vegetation cover]. Ekologiya, 3, 177–181 (in Russian).
10. Emelyanova, O. Yu. (2016). K metodike kompleksnoy otsenki dekorativnosti drevesnykh rasteny [To the method of complex assessment of the decorativeness of woody plants], Sovremennoye sadovodstvo, 3, 54–74 (in Russian).
11. Utkin, A. I. (1985). Derevo. Lesnaya entsiklopediya. Tom pervy «Abeliya – Limon». [Tree. Forest encyclopedia. Volume one “Abelia – Lemon”]. Sovetskaya entsiklopediya, Moscow, 249–255 (in Russian).
12. Anuchin, N. P., Atrokhin, V. G., Vinogradov, V. N. & Vorobyev, G. I. (1985). Lesnaya entsiklopediya. T. 1. Abeliya – Limon. [Forest encyclopedia. T. 1. Abelia – Lemon]. Sovetskaya entsiklopediya, Moscow (in Russian).
13. Anuchin, N. P., Atrokhin, V. G., Vinogradov, V. N. & Vorobyev, G. I. (1986). Lesnaya entsiklopediya. T. 2. Limonnik – Yashcheritsy. [Forest encyclopedia. T. 2. Lemongrass - Lizards]. Sovetskaya entsiklopediya, Moscow (in Russian).
14. Kokhno, M. A., Parkhomenko L. I. & Zarubenko A. U. (2002). Dendroflora Ukrayiny. Dykorosli y kultyvovani dereva i kushchi. Pokrytonasinni. Chastyna I. Dovidnyk. [Dendroflora of Ukraine. Wild and cultivated trees and shrubs. Covering seeds. Part I. Handbook]. Fitosotsiotsentr, Kyiv (in Ukrainian).
15. Kokhno, M. A. & Trokhymenko N. M. (2005). Dendroflora Ukrayiny. Dykorosli y kultyvovani dereva i kushchi. Pokry-tonasinni. Chastyna II. Dovidnyk. [Dendroflora of Ukraine. Wild and cultivated trees and shrubs. Covering seeds. Part II. Hand-book]. Fitosotsiotsentr, Kyiv (in Ukrainian).
16. Zaiachuk, V. Ya. (2014). Dendrolohiia. [Dendrology]. SPOLOM, Lviv (in Ukrainian).
17. Kononchuk, O. B. (2018). Plodovi ta yahidni kultury ahrobiolsboratorii Ternopilskoho natsionalnoho pedahohichno-ho universytetu imeni Volodymyra Hnatiuka. [Fruit and berry crops of agrobiolabotaroia of Ternopil National Pedagogical Uni-versity named after Volodymyr Hnatiuk]. Vektor, Ternopil (in Ukrainian).
18. Barna, M. M. & Barna, L. S. (2017). Dendrarii Ternopilskoho natsionalnoho pedahohichnoho universytetu imeni Vo-lodymyra Hnatiuka ta perpsektyvy stvorennia bibliinoho botanichnoho sadu. [Arboretum of Ternopil National Pedagogical Uni-versity named after Volodymyr Hnatiuk and prospects of creating a biblical botanical garden]. TOV “Terno – hraf”, Ternopil (in Ukrainian).
19. Zadvornyi, K. O. & Barna, M. M. (2019). Doslidshennia dendroflory hidroparku “Topilche” m. Ternopolia. [Research of dendroflora of Topilche hydropark in Ternopil]: Vseukrainska naukovo-praktychna konferentsiia, Vektor, Ternopil, 123–127 (in Ukrainian).
20. Kerkush, N. V. & Barna, M. M. (2019). Dendroflora vnutrishnnoho rekreatsiinoho dvoryks TNPU imeni Volodymyra Hnatiuka. [Dendroflora of the inner recreational yard of TNPU named after Volodymyr Hnatiuk]: Vseukrainska naukovo-praktychna konferentsiia, Vektor, Ternopil, 134‒138 (in Ukrainian).
21. Kokhanovskyi, V. M. (2001). Trostianetskyi lisopark. [Trostianets Forest Park]. Zapovidni skarby Sumshchyny. Vydavnytstvo “Dsherelo”, Sumy, 167–170 (in Ukrainian).
22. Melnyk, T. I. (2015). Stan vulychnykh nasadshen tsentralnoi chastyny m. Sumy. [Condition of street plantings in the central part of Sumy]. Visnyk Sumskoho ahrarnoho universytetu. Seriia: Ahronomiia i biolohiia, ed. 9, 219–224 (in Ukrainian).
23. Antoniv, S. F. (2017). Roslyny ta istyna oriiv. [Plants and the truth of the ori]. TOV Nilan – LTD, Vinnytsia (in Ukrain-ian)
24. Solovei, D. S. (2015). Osoblyvosti planuvannia safiv “novoi khvyli” Pita Udolfa. [Peculiarities of Pete Udolph's “new wave” garden planning]. Naukovyi visnyk NLTU Ukrainy, 25(2), 85–89 (in Ukrainian).
25. Vardanyan, Zh. A. (2017). Metodologicheskiye aspekty otsenki dekorativnosti drevesnykh rasteny. [Methodological aspects of assessing the decorativeness of woody plants], Biologichesky zhurnal Armenii, 340–349 (in Russian).
26. Pavlenkova, G. A. (2015). Otsenka vidov roda spireya (Spirea L.) genofonda dendrariya VNIISPK. [Assessment of species of the genus Spirea (Spirea L.) of the gene pool of the arboretum of VNIISPK [Electronic resource]. Sovremennoye sadovodstvo [Contemporary horticulture], 4, 77–85 (in Russian).
27. Ryazanova, N. A. & Putenikhin, V. P. (2011). Otsenka dekorativnosti klenov v Ufimskom Botanicheskom sadu. [As-sessment of the decorativeness of maples in the Ufa Botanical Garden]. Vesnik IrGSKhA, 4(44). 121–128 (in Russian).
28. Zalyvskaya, O. S. & Babich, N. A. (2012). Shkala kompleksnoy otsenki dekorativnosti derevyev i kustarnikov v gorodskikh usloviyakh na severe. [A comprehensive assessment scale for the decorativeness of trees and shrubs in urban conditions in the north]. Vestnik, PGTU, 96–105 (in Russian).
29. Barna, M. M. (2015). Botanika. Poniattia. Personalii. [Terms. Concept. Personalities]. TOV “Terno – hraf”, Ternopil (in Ukrainian).
30. Chopyk, V. І. & Fedoronchuk, M. M. (2015). Flora Ukrainskykh Karpat [Flora of the Ukrainian Carpathians]. TzOV «Terno – graf», Ternopіl (in Ukrainian).
Published
2020-02-24
How to Cite
Kokhanovskyi, V., Barna, M., Barna, L., & Melnyk, T. (2020). Methodological aspects of evaluation of ornamental woody plants of the Magnoliophyta division according the complex of morphological signs and signs of vitality. Bulletin of Sumy National Agrarian University. The Series: Agronomy and Biology, 39(1), 42-54. https://doi.org/10.32782/agrobio.2020.1.6