STUDY OF PHYTODIVERSITY OF THE SYROVATKA RIVER VALLEY WITH THE PERSPECTIVE OF USING ITS NATURAL COMPLEXES IN ECOLOGICAL TOURISM

Keywords: phytodiversity, environment, ecological tourism, human ecology, natural landscapes

Abstract

The paper presents the results of studying the phytodiversity of natural complexes of the Syrovatka river valley between the villages of Verkhnya Syrovatka and Novoselytsia of Sumy district. It is shown that this area is characterized by significant species wealth: here grow plants that have different ranks of protection (regional, state, international). The group of species of international protection is the largest and includes about 50 species. It is formed by plants included in the IUCN Red List. Almost all of them (except one) have a low protection status (LC – are at the lowest risk). Among the species included in the "Red Book of Ukraine", a small population of Iris pineticola Klokov was found, and among the plants presented in the "List of species subject to special protection in the Sumy region" - Salix rosmarinifolia L. and Crataegus ucrainica Pojark. The coenotic diversity represented by groups of aquatic, air-water, meadow and forest vegetation is also significant. Rich phytodiversity in combination with the flatness of the territory and whiteness to the settlements, including the city of Sumy, form an objective basis for the involvement of this area in tourism, recreation and environmental education. The most promising is the introduction of eco-tourism, which combines economic, social and environmental issues. In order to deepen knowledge about the formation, current state and dynamics of development of natural complexes of the Syrovatka river valley, it is necessary to continue geobotanical and zoological research of the territory. In addition, it is advisable to bring the forest into an aesthetically pleasing condition, in particular, to remove landfills. Taking into account the rich biodiversity of the territory, it is expedient to consider the issue of granting this territory environmental status with the choice of a category that will improve both the protection of flora and fauna and provide opportunities for recreational and tourist activities.

References

1. Barkin, D., & Bouchez, C. P. (2002). NGO–Community Collaboration for Ecotourism: A Strategy for Sustainable Regional Development. Current Issues in Tourism, 5(3–4), 245–253. doi: 10.1080/13683500208667921
2. Bashtovyi, М. Н., Skliar, V. H., Tykhonova, O. M., & Skljar, Ju. L. (2018). Turistychny claster Sumshiny: geomonitoring obektiv ekologichno-orientovanogo turismu yak skladova stalogo rozvitku regionu [Sumy region tourism cluster: geomonitoring of ecologically oriented tourism objects as a component of sustainable development of the region]. Visnyk Sumskogo universytetu, Еconomics and management, 8(77), 143–148 (in Ukrainian).
3. Bondarieva, L. M., Kyrylchuk, K. S., Skliar, V. H., Tykhonova, O. M., Zhatova, H. O., & Bashtovyi, M. G. (2019). Population dynamics of the typical meadow species in the conditions of pasture digression in flooded meadows. Ukrainian Journal of Ecology, 9(1), 204–211.
4. Burger, J. (2000). Landscapes, tourism, and conservation. Science of the Total Environment, 249(1–3), 39–49. doi: 10.1016/s0048-9697(99)00509-4.
5. Cardinale, B. J., Matulich, K. L., Hooper, D. D., Byrnes, J. E., Duffy, E., Gamfeldt, L., Balvanera, P., O'Connor, M.I. & Gonzalez, A. (2011). The functional role of producer diversity in ecosystems. American Journal of Botany, 98(3), 572-592. doi: 10.3732/ajb.1000364
6. Сopylec', Je. V. (2009).Traktuvannja ponjattja ekologichnyh cinnisnyh orijentacij u teorii' ekologichnoi' osvity i vyhovannja [Interpretation of the concept of ecological value orientations in the theory of ecological education and upbringing]. Slov’jans'k: SDPU, 14,184 – 188 (in Ukrainian).
7. Dmytruk, O. Ju., & Shhur, Ju. V. (2002). Ekologichnij turizm jak didaktichna osnova racional'nogo prirodokoristuvannja ta geoekologichnoi' osviti [Ecological tourism as a didactic basis of rational nature management and geoecological education]. Regional'ni ekologichni problemi, 36, 45–50 (in Ukrainian).
8. Dupuy, P., & Viñuales, J. (2018). International Environmental Law (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 594. doi: 10.1017/9781108399821
9. Geologicheskij ocherk Sumskoj oblasti [Geological feature article of the Sumy region] (1947). Red. D. N. Soboleva, L. I. Karjakina, I. P. Cherneckogo. Sumy, Bіl'shovic'ka zbroja, 375 (in Russian).
10. Hunt, C. A., Durham, W. H., Driscoll, L., Honey, M. (2015). "Can ecotourism deliver real economic, social, and environmental benefits? A study of the Osa Peninsula, Costa Rica". Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 23(3), 339–357. doi: 10.1080/09669582.2014.965176. ISSN 0966-9582. S2CID 55684006.
11. Honey, M. (2008). Ecotourism and Sustainable Development: Who Owns Paradise? (Second ed.). DC: Island Press, Washington, ISBN 978-1-59726-125-8.
12. Kaur, A. (2018) Conservation of Plant Biodiversity Current Strategies and Future Needs. International Journal of Scientific Research in Biological Sciences, 5(4), 109–113. doi: 10.26438/ijsrbs/v5i4.109113
13. Klymenko, G. O., Zlobin, Ju. A., & Bjelan, S. S. (2011). Shljahy vdoskonalennja ohorony ridkisnyh vydiv roslyn v Ukrai'ni [The ways of improving protection of rare plant species in Ukraine]. Vcheni zapysky Tavrichnogo nacional'nogo universytetu im. V. I. Vernads'kogo. Ser. Biologija ta himija, 24(63), 1, 52–59 (in Ukrainian).
14. Kozenja, E. Y. (2005). K sushhnosty voprosa ob ekologycheskom soznanyy [To the essence of the question of environmental consciousness]. Aktual'ni problemy psyhologii': zb. nauk. prac', 7(5), 1, 214–218 (in Russian).
15. Korovjakova, T. O., & Tyhonova, O. M. (2015). Cenopopuljacii' invazijnogo vydu Stenactis (Phalacroloma) annua (L). Cass. na zaplavnyh lukah richky Psel (Sums'ka oblast') [Cenopopulations of invasive species Stenactis (Phalacroloma) annua (L). Cass. on floodplain meadows of the river Psel (Sumy region)]. Visnyk Cherkas'kogo universytetu, 2(335), 60–66 (in Ukrainian).
16. L'ovochkina, A. M. (2003). Ekologichna psyhologija. Navchal'nyj posibnyk [Environmental Psychology: A Textbook]. Milenium, K., 120 (in Ukrainian).
17. Mace, G. M., Norris, K., & Fitter, A. H. (2012). Biodiversity and ecosystem services: a multilayered relationship. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 27(1),19-26. doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2011.08.006
18. Marynych, O. M., Parhomenko, G. O., Petrenko, O. M., & Shyshhenko, P. G. (2003). Udoskonalena shema fizykogeografichnogo rajonuvannja Ukrai'ny [Improved scheme of physical and geographical zoning of Ukraine]. Ukr. geograf. zhurn.,1, 16–20 (in Ukrainian).
19. Posohov, I. S., & Sagaidachna, A. V. (2019). Perspektyvi rozvytku ecologichnogo turyzmu v Ukraini [Prospects for the development of ecological tourism in Ukraine]. Visnyk Harkivskogo universytetu. International Relations. Еconomics. Country Studies. Tourism, 9, 203–212. (in Ukrainian). doi: 10.26565/2310B9513B2019B9B25
20. Rahman, M. A. (2018) Plant diversity in Hazarikhil Wildlife Sanctuary of Chittagong and its conservation management. Journal of Biodiversity Conservation and Bioresource Management, 3(2), 43–56. doi: 10.3329/jbcbm.v3i2.36027
21. Salk, C. F., Chazdon, R., & Waiswa, R. (2020). Thinking outside the plot: monitoring forest biodiversity for socialecological research. Ecology and Society, 25(1), 7. doi: 10.5751/ES-11223-250107
22. Segelbacher, G. (2018). Genetic, genomic, synthetic - new approaches for biodiversity conservation. Proceedings of the 5th European Congress of Conservation Biology. ECCB2018: 5th European Congress of Conservation Biology. 12th - 15th of June 2018, Jyväskylä, Finland. doi: 10.17011/conference/eccb2018/107508
23. Skliar, V. G., Skliar, Ju. L., Gudakov, O. O., & Tykhonova, O. M. (2012). Harakterystyka pryrodnyh kompleksiv Get'mans'kogo nacional'nogo pryrodnogo parku [Characteristics of natural systems of the Getmanski National Nature Park]. Visnyk Sums'kogo NAU. Serija «Agronomija i biologija», 2(23), 13–17 (in Ukrainian).
24. Skliar, V. G., Jemec', O. M., & Skliar, Ju. L. (2020). Bioriznomanittja proektovanogo zakaznyka «Kalii'vs'kyj» [Biodiversity of the projected reserve "Kaliyivsky"]. Monitoryng ta ohorona bioriznomanittja v Ukrai'ni : prykladni aspekty monitoryngu ta ohorony bioriznomanittja. «Conservation Biology in Ukraine». Druk Art, Kyi'v ; Chernivci,16(3), 441–444 (in Ukrainian).
25. Skliar, V. H. (2014). Pryrodne vidnovlennia providnykh lisoutvoriuvalnykh vydiv Novhorod-Siverskoho Polissia: realizovani ekolohichni nishi ta yikhnia dynamika [Natural restoration of the leading forest-forming species of Novgorod-Siversky Polissya: realized ecological niches and their dynamics]. Ukr. botan. Journal, 71 (1), 8–16 (in Ukrainian).
26. Skrebec', V. O. (2005). Suchasnyj stan ta priorytetni naprjamy rozvytku ekologichnoi' psyhologii' v Ukrai'ni [Currentstate and priority directions of development of ecological psychology in Ukraine]. Aktual'ni problemy psyhologii'. Zb. nauk. pr., 5(2), 235– 245 (in Ukrainian).
27. Sheljag-Sosonko, Ju. R. (1971). Formacija duba zvychajnogo (Querceta roboris) Livoberezhnogo rel'jefnogo lisostepu Ukrai'ny [Formation of common oak (Querceta roboris) of the Left-bank relief forest-steppe of Ukraine]. Ukr. botanichnyj zhurnal, 28(3), 356–361 (in Ukrainian).
28. Sui, X., Mao, L., Liu, Y., & He, F. (2018). Mapping relative extinction risk for biodiversity conservation. Biological Conservation, 226, 168–176. doi: 0.1016/j.biocon.2018.07.012
29. Wilsey, B. J. (2018). Biodiversity of Grasslands. Oxford Scholarship Online. doi: 10.1093/oso/9780198744511.003.0002
Published
2022-02-21
How to Cite
Skliar, V. G., Tykhonova, O. M., Kyrylchuk, K. S., Klymenko, H. O., Onoprienko, V. P., Bondarieva, L. M., Trotska, S. S., & Klimenko, J. O. (2022). STUDY OF PHYTODIVERSITY OF THE SYROVATKA RIVER VALLEY WITH THE PERSPECTIVE OF USING ITS NATURAL COMPLEXES IN ECOLOGICAL TOURISM. Bulletin of Sumy National Agrarian University. The Series: Agronomy and Biology, 45(3), 45-51. https://doi.org/10.32845/agrobio.2021.3.6