PRODUCTIVE QUALITIES OF SOWS OF DANISH AND CANADIAN BREEDING IN THE INDUSTRIAL TECHNOLOGY

Keywords: pigs, technology, breeding methods, reproductive traits, breeding index.

Abstract

The increase in pork production largely depends on the number of sows in the farms and their productivity. Obviously, in order to offset the low reproductive performance of sows, it is necessary to increase their number in order to produce the planned amount of products. An increase in the number of sows means an increase in the number of machines, equipment, premises and, accordingly, the entire cost chain for raising suckling piglets. Therefore, increasing the number of sows is not economically justified. A more effective option is to use hybridization and crossbreeding, which will increase productivity levels due to the influence of heterosis. In the presented research, the aim was to compare the productive qualities of sows of Danish and Canadian origin in the conditions of industrial technology of pork production on the basis of the farm LLC «Agro Novorayske», Kherson region. The material of the research was the productive and reproductive qualities of F1 sows obtained from Landrace and Large White animals of Danish origin inseminated with Danish Duroc boar sperm (control group I) and their F1 counterparts obtained from Canadian Large White and Landrace pigs inseminated with Canadian Duroc boar sperm (experimental group II). The performance of the experimental animals was evaluated according to generally accepted methods in pig production. The parameters of feeding, watering, housing, care and prevention of animals in the experiments complied with European legislation on animal protection and welfare. Sows of Danish origin in the conditions of the industrial complex of southern Ukraine were characterized by 11.1% higher fertility, 9.0% higher number of piglets in the nest at farrowing and, as a result, 7.6 and 9.1% higher complex indices of reproductive qualities. Representatives of the Canadian selection had a 2.0% lower proportion of stillborn piglets, 10.9% and 7.5% higher piglet weights at birth and weaning, and 2.1% higher piglet survival during the suckling period. At the same time, in terms of average daily and absolute growth of suckling piglets and nest weight, no significant difference was found between the animals of the experimental groups.

References

1. Council Directive 91/630/EU, 2008/120/EU, (2008). URL: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:02008L0120-20191214&from=NL (date of access 05.12.2023).
2. Council Directive 98/58/EU, (2008). URL: https://www.fao.org/faolex/results/details/ru/c/LEX-FAOC025031/ (date of access 05.12.2023).
3. Council Directive 2010/63/EU, (2010). URL: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:L:2010:276:0033:0079:en:PDF (date of access 05.12.2023).
4. Council Directive 2008/120/EC of 18 December 2008 laying down minimum standards for the protection of pigs (Codified version). Official Journal of the European Union. L 47. 18.2.2009. P. 5–13.
5. Vidomchi normy tekhnolohichnoho proektuvannia Svynarski pidpryiemstva (kompleksy, fermy, fermy), VNTP-APK – 02.05. [Departmental norms of technological design Pig enterprises (complexes, farms, small farms), VNTP-APK – 02.05] K.: Ministry of Agricultural Policy of Ukraine, 2005. 98 p.
6. Hallauer, A. R., Carena, M. J., Miranda Filho, J. D. (2020). Quantitative Genetics in Maize Breeding, 6. Berlin: Springer Science & Business Media. URL: https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-1-4419-0766-0
7. Harmatiuk K. (2019). Innovatsiini pidkhody pry poiednanni svynei riznoho pokhodzhennia v umovakh pivdnia Ukrainy. [Innovative approaches when combining pigs of different origins in southern Ukraine.] Ahrarnyi visnyk Prychornomoria. Odesa. Vyp. 95. S. 39–46. (in Ukrainian) URL: https://abbsl.osau.edu.ua/index.php/visnuk/article/view/83/79
8. Hryshyna L. P., Fesenko O. H. (2015). Efektyvnist vykorystannia spetsializovanoho typu svynei za skhreshchuvannia ta hibrydyzatsii. [Effective use of a specialized type of pigs for crossbreeding and hybridization.] Visnyk ahrarnoi nauky Prychornomoria. Vyp. 2 (84). T. 2. S. 40–47. (in Ukrainian).
9. Iacolina, L., Corlatti, L., Buzan, E., Safner, T., Šprem, N. (2019). Hybridisation in European ungulates: an overview of the current status, causes, and consequences. Mamm Rev., 49, 45–59.
10. Ibatulin, I. I., Zhukorskyi, O. M. (2017). Methodology and organization of scientific research in animal husbandry [Methodology and organization of scientific research in animal husbandry]. K., 328. (in Ukrainian).
11. Kramarenko, S. S., Lugovou, S. I., Lykhach, A. V., Kramarenko O. S. (2019). Analiz biometrychnykh danykh u rozvedenni ta selektsii tvaryn [Analysis of biometric data in animal breeding and selection]. Mykolauiv: MNAU, 211. (in Ukrainian).
12. Ladyka, V. I., Khmelnychiy, L. M., Povod, M. G. (2023). Tekhnolohiia vyrobnytstva i pererobky produktsii tvarynnytstva: pidruchnyk dlia aspirantiv [Technology of production and processing of livestock products: a textbook for graduate students]. Odesa: Oldi+, 244. (in Ukrainian).
13. Zakon Ukrainy “Pro veterynarnu medytsynu” [Law of Ukraine "On Veterinary Medicine"], 2021, No. 1206-IX. URL: https://document.vobu.ua/doc/12206 (date of access 05.12.2023) (in Ukrainian).
14. Zakon Ukrainy Pro zakhyst tvaryn vid zhorstokoho povodzhennia [Law of Ukraine On Protection of Animals from Cruelty], 2006, No. 27. URL: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/3447-15#Text (date of access 05.12.2023) (in Ukrainian).
15. Lykhach, V. Ya., Povod, M. G., Shpetny, M. B., Nechmilov, V. M., Lykhach, A. V., Mykhalko, O. G., Barkar, E. V., Lenkov, L. G., Kucher O. O. (2023). Optymizatsiia tekhnolohichnykh rishen utrymannia ta hodivli svynei v umovakh promyslovoi tekhnolohii [Optimization of technological solutions for keeping and feeding pigs in conditions of industrial technology: monograph]. Mykolayiv: Ilion, 518 p. (in Ukrainian).
16. Mykhalko, O. G. (2021). Suchasnyi stan ta shliakhy rozvytku svynarstva v sviti ta Ukraini [The current state and ways of development of pig farming in the world and in Ukraine]. Visnyk Sumskoho natsionalnoho ahrarnoho universytetu. Seriia «Tvarynnytstvo» [Bulletin of the Sumy National Agrarian University. Series «Livestock»], 3, 60–77. (in Ukrainian) https://doi.org/10.32845/bsnau.lvst.2021.3.9
17. Mykhalko, O., Povod, M. (2019). Vidtvoriuvalni yakosti svynomatok danskoho ta frantsuzkoho pokhodzhennia v umovakh promyslovoho kompleksu [Reproductive qualities of sows of Danish and French origin in the conditions of the industrial complex.] Bulletin of Sumy National Agrarian University. The Series: Livestock, 1-2(36-37), 27–37. https://doi.org/10.32845/bsnau.lvst.2019.1-2.4 (in Ukrainian).
18. Nakaz Ministerstva rozvytku ekonomiky, torhivli ta silskoho hospodarstva Ukrainy №224 vid 08.02.2021 r. «Pro zatverdzhennia vymoh do blahopoluchchia silskohospodarskykh tvaryn pid chas yikh utrymannia». [On approval of measures for the well-being of farm animals during their keeping] Zareiestr. vid 18.02.2021 Ministerstvom Yustytsii Ukrainy № 206/35828. (in Ukrainian).
19. Nakaz Ministerstva rozvytku ekonomiky, torhivli ta silskoho hospodarstva Ukrainy [Order of the Ministry of Economic Development, Trade and Agriculture of Ukraine]. 2021, No. 224. [Elektronnyi resurs] (in Ukrainian). Rezhym dostupu: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/z0209-21#Text (date of access 05.12.2023).
20. Pelykh V.H., Chernyshov I.V., Levchenko M.V. (2012). Henofond miasnykh porid ta perspektyvy yoho vykorystannia v svynarstvi. [The gene pool of meat breeds and prospects for its use in pig breeding.] Tavriiskyi naukovyi visnyk. Vyp. 78. chastyna 2 tom 1. Kherson. S. 160-165. (in Ukrainian).
21. Povod, M. H., Andrieieva, D. M., Lykhach, A. V., Deshchenko, O. S., Lykhach, V. Ya., Rieznichenko, V. I., & Bondarska, O. M. (2022). Peredvoiennyi stan vitchyznianoho svynarstva [The pre-war state of domestic pig farming]. Visnyk Poltavskoi Derzhavnoi Ahrarnoi Akademii [Bulletin of the Poltava State Agrarian Academy], 2, 175–185. https://doi.org/10.31210/visnyk2022.02.21 (in Ukrainian).
22. Povod, M. H., Mykhalko, O. H., & Kremez M. I. (2022). Reproductive qualities of sows of maternal and paternal lines in the conditions of a breeding breeder. [Reproductive qualities of sows of maternal and paternal lines in the conditions of a breeding breeder.] Bulletin of Sumy National Agrarian University. The Series: Livestock, (4 (47), 133-137. (in Ukrainian) https://doi.org/10.32845/bsnau.lvst.2021.4.22
23. Povod, M., Bondarska, O., Lykhach, V., Zhyshka, S., Nechmilov, V. (2021). Tekhnolohiia vyrobnytstva produktsii svynarstva [Production technology of pig farming products], K.: Scientific and Methodological Center of VFPO, 360. (in Ukrainian).
24. Vymohy do blahopoluchchia svynei pid chas yikh utrymannia [Requirements for the well-being of pigs during their keeping]. 2021, [Elektronnyi resurs] (in Ukrainian). Rezhym dostupu: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/z0209-21#Text (date of access 05.12.2023).
25. Samorè, A. B. and Fontanesi, L. (2016). Genomic selection in pigs: state of the art and perspectives. Italian Journal of Animal Science, 15(2), 211–232. DOI: 10.1080/1828051X.2016.1172034.
26. Shvachka R., Povod M., Mykhalko O., Shpetnyi M., Korzh O., Verbelchuk T., Shcherbyna O. (2022). [Vidtvorni yakosti svynomatok pry riznii tryvalosti poperednoi laktatsii ] Reproductive qualities of sows at different durations of previous lactation. Scientific Papers Series Management, Economic Engineering in Agriculture and Rural Development. Vol. 22, Issue 1, pp. 579-584. (in Ukrainian).
27. Susol R. L., Ilieva K. V. (2017). Vidtvoriuvalni oznaky svynei zalezhno vid pokhodzhennia ta poiednannia v umovakh pivdnia Ukrainy. [Reproductive traits of pigs depending on origin and breeding in southern Ukraine Ahrarnyi visnyk Prychornomoria.] Odesa. Vyp. 84 (1). S. 81-85. http://lib.osau.edu.ua/jspui/handle/123456789/1538 (in Ukrainian).
28. Vashchenko O. V. (2016). Produktyvnist svynei pry chystoporodnomu rozvedenni ta skhreshchuvanni. [Productivity of pigs during purebred breeding and crossbreeding.] Rozvedennia i henetyka tvaryn. Kyiv. Vyp. 51. S. 34-41. (in Ukrainian).
29. Xu, Y., Li, P., Zou, C., Lu, Y., Xie, C., Zhang, X. (2017). Enhancing genetic gain in the era of molecular breeding. J. Exp. Bot., 68, 2641–2666. doi: 10.1093/jxb/erx135.
30. Vymohy do blahopoluchchia svynei pid chas yikh utrymannia. [Requirements for the welfare of pigs during their keeping.] Nakaz Ministerstva rozvytku ekonomiky, torhivli ta silskoho hospodarstva Ukrainy 08 liutoho 2021 roku № 224. https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/z0209-21#Text
Published
2023-12-22
How to Cite
Voloshynov, V. V., & Povod, M. H. (2023). PRODUCTIVE QUALITIES OF SOWS OF DANISH AND CANADIAN BREEDING IN THE INDUSTRIAL TECHNOLOGY. Bulletin of Sumy National Agrarian University. The Series: Livestock, (4), 3-9. https://doi.org/10.32782/bsnau.lvst.2023.4.1

Most read articles by the same author(s)