Depending reproductive qualities of sows of the microclimate systems during the year
Abstract
We have studied the results of the influence of geothermal and traditional ventilation systems for keeping sows and conditionally sowed sows on their microclimate parameters during the year, and the dependence on these parameters of sows' reproductive qualities. Both classic and geothermal indoor ventilation systems provided optimal microclimate in the transitional seasons, but did not provide the recommended indicators of air temperature and humidity in winter and summer seasons. The difference in air temperature did not affect the difference in sow skin temperature in all seasons except winter. The geothermal ventilation system created more comfortable holding conditions for sows during insemination, which affected the reproductive qualities of sows throughout the seasons except winter. The microclimate parameters created by different ventilation systems influenced the sows' arrival in hunting, their fertilization and the percentage of farrowing. This effect was more pronounced in summer and autumn, and less so in winter and spring. The research in this area is planned to be continued, and their results will be used in the design and reconstruction of pig premises.
References
2. Voloshhuk V. M., Povod M. G., 2013. Vplyv umov utrymannja na reproduktyvni jakosti svynomatok [The influence of keeping conditions on reproductive traits of sows]. Svynarstvo. Mizhvidomchyj tematychnij zbirnyk Instytutu svynarstva i APV NAAN. Poltava. issue 62. pp.27-32.
3. Kalynyn M. 2017. Optymal'nuj mykroklymat s mynymal'numy zatratamy energoresursov [Optimum microclimate with minimal energy costs]. Svynovodstvo. issue 3. pp.30-32.
4. Kuz'myna T.N. 2014. Sovershenstvovanye systemy mykroklymata v svynovodstve [Improving the microclimate system in pig farming]. Nauka v central'noj Rossyy. issue 3 (9). pp.29-36.
5. Lyhach V.J. Lyhach A.V. 2015. Vplyv tehnologii' utrymannja na vidtvorjuval'ni jakosti svynomatok [The influence of retention technology on the reproductive quality of sows]. Visnyk Dnipropetrovs'kogo derzhavnogo agrarno-ekonomichnogo universytetu. issue 4. pp.103-107.
6. Pohodnja G.S., Yvchenko A.N., Fedorchuk E.G. 2015. Vosproyzvodytel'naja funkcyja svynomatok po sezonam goda [Reproductive function of sows by season]. Vestnyk Brjanskoj gosudarstvennoj sel'skohozjajstvennoj akademyy. issue 2-1. pp.44-45.
7. Prygodin A. 2004. Mikroklimat tvarynnyc'kyh prymishhen' i jogo vplyv na zdorov’ja ta produktyvnist' tvaryn u ZAT «Bahmuts'kyj Agrarnyj Sojuz» [The microclimate of livestock buildings and its impact on health and productivity of animals in JSC "Bahmutskiy Agrarian Union"]. Veterynarna medycyna Ukrai'ny. issue 11. – pp.42.
8. Starodubec' O. O. 2015. Vplyv sezonu roku na vidtvorjuval'ni jakosti svynomatok [Influence of seasonality on reproductive sows qualities] Visnyk agrarnoi' nauky Prychornomor’ja. issue. 4-2 pp.100-103.
9. Topchij L. I. 2009. Vplyv sezonnosti na vidtvorjuval'ni jakosti svynomatok ukrai'ns'koi' stepovoi' biloi' porody svynej [Influence of seasonality on reproductive sows qualities of Large White breed] Naukovyj visnyk „AskanijaNova”. issue 2. pp.158-159.