АНАЛІЗ ВПЛИВУ МАТЕРІАЛУ УПАКОВКИ НА ПОКАЗНИКИ ЯКОСТІ ПИВА

V. D. Ivchenko; N. M. Inshyna; O. G. Shvets; L. M. Ponomarova; S. B. Bolshanina; V. O. Myronenko

doi:10.32782/msnau.2025.1.5

V. D. Ivchenko Sumy National Agrarian University https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5985-9712
N. M. Inshyna Sumy State University https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8204-8547
O. G. Shvets Sumy National Agrarian University https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9872-3829
L. M. Ponomarova Sumy State University https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1637-3229
S. B. Bolshanina Sumy State University https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9482-8620
V. O. Myronenko Sumy National Agrarian University

DOI: https://doi.org/10.32782/msnau.2025.1.5

Keywords: Physicochemical analysis methods, titrated beer acidity, foam stability, oxidation-reduction potential, brewing, PET packaging, biotechnology of low-alcohol beverages

Abstract

The article presents the results of a study on the influence of packaging materials (glass, plastic, metal) on the physicochemical quality indicators of pale beer produced by three manufacturers: PJSC "Obolon" ("Okhtyrske Svitle"), PJSC "Carlsberg Ukraine" ("Lvivske 1715"), and LLC "Persha Pryvatna Brovarnia" ("Zakarpatske Oryhinalne"). The study aimed to determine the optimal packaging material for beer storage that ensures the best characteristics of the beverage throughout its shelf life. Analytical methods were used to assess changes in the key quality indicators of beer. Transparency and color parameters were evaluated using a photocolorimetric method, total acidity was determined by the titrimetric method, and density was measured by the hydrometric method. The redox potential of beer was assessed using the I–160MI ion meter. The research was conducted under standardized conditions, which allowed for an objective evaluation of the impact of packaging material on beer quality during storage. The analysis of the obtained data indicates that glass containers are the optimal choice for beer storage. They ensure the stability of the main physicochemical indicators, including foam formation, redox balance, and the preservation of the beverage’s antioxidant properties. Glass packaging also prevents interactions between the container material and beer components, which is crucial for maintaining the organoleptic properties of the drink. Based on the research findings, metal packaging can be considered a viable alternative to glass, offering certain advantages. It effectively protects beer from photochemical changes and helps retain carbon dioxide better, which positively influences foam formation. However, the elevated pH values and titrated acidity of "Zakarpatske Oryhinalne" beer in a metal can may indicate potential interactions between the beverage components and the packaging surface. This could affect the chemical composition of the drink and requires further investigation. PET bottles were found to be the least suitable for beer storage. They allow oxygen and light penetration, which accelerates oxidation processes, alters the color of the beverage, and degrades its organoleptic properties and overall quality. Additionally, PET packaging leads to a faster loss of carbon dioxide, negatively impacting foam stability. The obtained results confirm the need to strengthen requirements for the storage duration and sales conditions of beer in PET packaging. This will help minimize losses in taste and beneficial properties of the beverage and preserve its quality throughout the entire shelf life.

References

1. Adamenko, K., Kawa-Rygielska, J., & Kucharska, A. Z. (2020). Characteristics of Cornelian cherry sour non-alcoholic beers brewed with the special yeast Saccharomycodes ludwigii. Food Chemistry, 312, 125968. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2019.125968
2. Bellut, K., & Arendt, E. K. (2019). Chance and Challenge: Non-Saccharomyces Yeasts in Nonalcoholic and Low Alcohol Beer Brewing – A Review. Journal of the American Society of Brewing Chemists, 77(2), 77–91. https://doi.org/10.1080/03610470.2019.1569452
3. Benadouda, K., Sajid, S., Chaudhri, S.F., Tazally, K.J., Marcus, & Bala Krishna Prabhala. (2023). Current State of Sensors and Sensing Systems Utilized in Beer Analysis. Beverages, 9(1), 5–5. https://doi.org/10.3390/beverages9010005
4. Blishch, R. О. (2023). Tekhnolohichni aspekty oderzhannia funktsionalnoho pyva [Technological aspects of obtaining functional beer]. Herald of Lviv University of Trade and Economics Technical Sciences, 33, 33–39. https://doi.org/10.36477/2522-1221-2023-33-05 (in Ukrainian).
5. Blishch, R. О. (2024). Analiz ryzykiv ta krytychnykh kontrolnykh tochok (NASSR) pry vyrobnytstvi pyva nefiltrovanoho [Analysis of risks and critical control points (HACCP) in the production of unfiltered beer]. Herald of Lviv University of Trade and Economics. Technical Sciences, 39, 31–37. https://doi.org/10.32782/2522-1221-2024-39-04 (in Ukrainian).
6. Blishch, К. О., Petryshyn, N. Z., & Babych, І. М. (2021). Alternatyva khmeliu u vyrobnytstvi pyva [An alternative to hops in beer production]. Herald of Lviv University of Trade and Economics Technical Sciences, 25, 31–37. https://doi.org/10.36477/2522-1221-2021-25-04 (in Ukrainian).
7. Cejnar, R., Hložková, K., Jelínek, L., Kotrba, P., & Dostálek, P. (2017). Development of engineered yeast for biosorption of beer haze-active polyphenols. Applied microbiology and biotechnology, 101(4), 1477–1485. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-016-7923-8
8. DSTU 3888:2015 Beer. General technical conditions – K.: SE "UkrNDNC", 2015 -17 p.
9. Gagula, G., Mastanjević, K., Mastanjević, K., Krstanović, V., Horvat, D., & Magdić, D. (2020). The influence of packaging material on volatile compounds of pale lager beer. Food Packaging and Shelf Life, 24, 100496. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fpsl.2020.100496
10. Gasiński, A., Kawa-Rygielska, J., Szumny, A., Czubaszek, A., Gąsior, J., & Pietrzak, W. (2020). Volatile Compounds Content, Physicochemical Parameters, and Antioxidant Activity of Beers with Addition of Mango Fruit (Mangifera Indica). Molecules, 25(13), 3033. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules25133033
11. Gonzalez Viejo, C., Fuentes, S., Godbole, A., Widdicombe, B., & Unnithan, R. (2020). Development of a low-cost e-nose to assess aroma profiles: An artificial intelligence application to assess beer quality. Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical, 308, 127688. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.snb.2020.127688
12. Habschied, K., Krstanović, V., & Mastanjević, K. (2022). Beer Quality Evaluation–A Sensory Aspect. Beverages, 8(1), 15. https://doi.org/10.3390/beverages8010015
13. Herez, А., Dulka, О., & Prybylskyi, V. (2021). Ways to increase beer stability. Débats Scientifiques et Orientations Prospectives Du Développement Scientifique, 3, 35–36. https://doi.org/10.36074/logos-05.02.2021.v3.09
14. Hoshko, T. (2023). Vyrobnytstvo ta spozhyvannia pyva v rannomodernomu Polskomu korolivstvi [Beer Production and Consumption in the Early Modern Kingdom of Poland]. Ukrainian Historical Review, 2, 35–59. https://doi.org/10.47632/2786-717x-2023-2-35-59 (in Ukrainian).
15. Imaizumi, V. M. (2022). Jabuticaba fruit beer: physicochemical and sensory evaluation. Revista Tecnológica, 30(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.4025/revtecnol.v30i1.57643
16. Johansson, L., Nikulin, J., Juvonen, R., Krogerus, K., Magalhães, F., Mikkelson, A., Nuppunen-Puputti, M., Sohlberg, E., de Francesco, G., Perretti, G., & Gibson, B. (2021). Sourdough cultures as reservoirs of maltose-negative yeasts for low-alcohol beer brewing. Food Microbiology, 94, 103629. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fm.2020.103629
17. Li, M., Du, J., & Zhang, K. (2020). Profiling of carbohydrates in commercial beers and their influence on beer quality. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 100(7), 3062–3070. https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.10337
18. Ludyn, А. M. (2023). Іons composition of mash water and their influence on beer quality. Chemistry Technology and Application of Substances, 6(1), 45–53. https://doi.org/10.23939/ctas2023.01.045
19. Meza-Márquez, O. G., Rodríguez-Híjar, A. R., Gallardo-Velázquez, T., Osorio-Revilla, G., & Ramos-Monroy, O. A. (2024). The Prediction of Quality Parameters of Craft Beer with FT-MIR and Chemometrics. Foods, 13(8), 1157. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods13081157
20. Michiels, P., Winok Debyser, Courtin, C., & Niels Langenaeken. (2023). Filtration enzymes applied during mashing affect beer composition and viscosity. Journal of the Institute of Brewing, 129(3), 176–191. https://doi.org/10.58430/jib.v129i3.27
21. Mohanasundaram, S., Ramirez-Asis, E., Quispe-Talla, A., Bhatt, M. W., & Shabaz, M. (2021). Experimental replacement of hops by mango in beer: production and comparison of total phenolics, flavonoids, minerals, carbohydrates, proteins and toxic substances. International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, 13(S1), 132–145. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13198-021-01308-3
22. Nahurna, N., Osypenkova, I., & Chepurna, О. (2020). Khemoretseptsiia u sviti pyva [Chemoreception in the world of beer]. Innovations and Technologies in the Service Sphere and Food Industry, 1, 32–39. https://doi.org/10.24025/2708-4949.1.2020.206438 (in Ukrainian).
23. Nahurna, N., Osypenkova, І., Chepurna, О., & Kurylenko, Y. (2023). Formuvannia smaku pyva [Beer flavor formation]. Innovations and Technologies in the Service Sphere and Food Industry, 1(7), 48–56. https://doi.org/10.32782/2708-4949.1(7).2023.9 (in Ukrainian).
24. Pavlečić M, Tepalović D, Ivančić Šantek M, Rezić T, Šantek B. (2012). The effect of total oxygen concentration in the bottle on the beer quality during storage. Croat J Food Technol Biotech Nut 7:118-125. https://hrcak.srce.hr/file/126551
25. Puligundla, P., Smogrovicova, D., Mok, C., & Obulam, V. S. R. (2020). Recent developments in high gravity beer-brewing. Innovative Food Science & Emerging Technologies, 64, 102399. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifset.2020.102399
26. Ramos, M., Valdés, A., Mellinas, A., & Garrigós, M. (2015). New Trends in Beverage Packaging Systems: A Review. Beverages, 1(4), 248–272. https://doi.org/10.3390/beverages1040248
27. Samoilyk, Iu., Mykolenko, І. ., Zyma, V., & Кolesnyk, V. (2023). Potentsial vyrobnytstva pyvovarnoho yachmeniu: transformatsiini tendentsii, chynnyky, efektyvnist [The malting barley production potential: transformational trends, factors, efficiency]. Ahrosvit, 20, 51–58. https://doi.org/10.32702/2306-6792.2023.20.51 (in Ukrainian).
28. Scheurer, M., & Nödler, K. (2021). Ultrashort-chain perfluoroalkyl substance trifluoroacetate (TFA) in beer and tea – An unintended aqueous extraction. Food Chemistry, 351, 129304. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2021.129304
29. Sohrabvandi, S., Mortazavian, A. M., & Rezaei, K. (2020). Advanced analytical methods for the analysis of chemical and microbiological properties of beer. Journal of Food and Drug Analysis, 19(2). https://doi.org/10.38212/2224-6614.2228
30. Wierenga, P. A., Basheva, E. S., & Delahaije, R. J. B. M. (2023). Variations in foam collapse and thin film stability with constant interfacial and bulk properties. Advances in colloid and interface science, 312, 102845. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cis.2023.102845
31. Yevtushenko, V., Semenchenko, О., & Bezpalchenko, V. (2020). Doslidzhennia yakosti pyva svitloho vitchyznianoho vyrobnytstva [Quality study of light beer of the domestic production]. Naukovyi visnyk Poltavskoho universytetu ekonomiky i torhivli. 1(96), 47–53. https://doi.org/10.37734/2518-7171-2020-1-6 (in Ukrainian),
32. Zhang, H., Zou, G., Liu, W., & Zhou, Z. (2020). Beer Taste Detection Based on Electronic Tongue. Sensors and Materials, 32(9), 2949. https://doi.org/10.18494/sam.2020.2710

ANALYSIS OF THE IMPACT OF PACKAGING MATERIAL ON BEER QUALITY INDICATORS

Abstract

References