ENGINEERING MANAGEMENT OF INFLUENCE OF PERFORMANCE INDICATORS OF RELIABILITY AND MAINTAINABILITY OF GRAIN HARVESTER ON EFFICIENCY OF ITS MACHINE USER

Keywords: reliability, maintainability, productivity, time between failures, reliability, crop losses, criteria

Abstract

The article formulates methodological approaches of engineering management to maintain the efficiency of combine harvesters, for which during the entire period of operation it is associated with the complexity of their structure through the use of automated and hydraulic devices, electronics, increased productivity emphasizes the importance of combine failure for technical reasons. In the current development of mechanization of agricultural production, in the author's opinion, should be based on two equally important points, namely the growth of production of the agro-industrial complex and the rational reduction of its cost. Completion of the combine fleet of farms with domestic or foreign machines should be carried out taking into account these factors, as well as other requirements of today. The authors have developed a method for evaluating the efficiency of combine harvesters on two criteria of reliability, namely indicators of reliability and maintainability, on the specific total cost per hectare of the area harvested of grain crops. The process of machine use of the combine is considered in the form of a queuing system, where the device is considered to be the harvesting machine, from which comes the flow of failures that cause the equipment to stand still. The article obtains comparative dependences of specific total costs on these reliability indicators, which are characterized by failure time, recovery time and other indicators that affect their efficiency: the book value of the combine, service life, cost of sales, crop yields and harvest duration on the example of grain combine Class Mega-370. The dependence is obtained, which shows that the harvest will last 14 days with the help of 24 combine harvesters with downtime not exceeding 1.24 hours, or 25 combine harvesters with downtime of 1.9 hours. The obtained results, as a prospect of further research, can be used by agricultural farms in completing the combine fleet of both domestic and imported models of combine harvesters.

References

1. Aven, T. (2016). Risk assessment and risk management: review of recent advances on their foundation. European Journal of Operational Research 253(1): 1–13.
2. Chen, Y., Mao, E., Li, W., & Chen, J. (2020). Design and experiment of a high-clearance self-propelled sprayer chassis. International Journal of Agricultural and Biological Engineering 13(2): 71–80.
3. Corinne, B., & José, R. (2017). Estimating the Hurst parameter. Statistical Inference for Stochastic Processes. Springer Verlag, 10(1): 49–73.
4. Erokhin, M., Pastukhov, A., & Kazantsev, S. (2019). Operability assessment of drive shafts of John Deere tractors in operational parameters. Engineering for rural development 18: 28–33.
5. Gurcanli, E., Bilir, S., & Sevim, M. (2015). Activity based risk assessment and safety cost estimation for residential building construction projects. Safety Science 80: 1–12.
6. Gyansah, L., & Ansah, A. (2020). Fatigue crack initiation analysis in 1060 steel. Research journal of applied sciences engineering and technology 4(2): 319–325.
7. Hrynkiv, A., Rogovskii, I., Aulin, V., Lysenko, S., Titova, L., Zagurskіy, O., & Kolosok, I. (2020). Development of a system for determining the informativeness of the diagnosing parameters of the cylinder-piston group of the diesel engines in operation. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies 3 (5(105)): 19−29. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2020.206073
8. Khamidullina, E.A., Timofeeva, S.S., & Smirnov, G.I. (2017). Accidents in coal mining from perspective of risk theory. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering 262: 012210.
9. Kuzmich, I.M., Rogovskii, I.L., Titova, L.L., & Nadtochiy, O.V. (2021). Research of passage capacity of combine harvesters depending on agrobiological state of bread mass. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science 677: 052002. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/677/5/052002
10. Kypris, O., Nlebedim, I., & Jiles, D. (2016). Measuring stress variation with depth using Barkhausen signal. Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials – Science Direct 407: 377–395.
11. Nadtochiy, O. & Titova, L. (2018). Simulation of agricultural processes. TEKA 18(2): 39-49.
12. Najafi, P., Asoodar, M., Marzban, A., & Hormozi, M. (2015). Reliability analysis of agricultural machinery: A case study of sugarcane chopper harvester. AgricEngInt: CIGR Journal March 17(1)1: 158–165.
13. Nazarenko, I., Dedov, O., Bernyk, I., Rogovskii, I., Bondarenko, A., Zapryvoda, A., & Titova, L. (2020). Study of stability of modes and parameters of motion of vibrating machines for technological purpose. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies 6 (7(108)): 71−79. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2020.217747
14. Nazarenko, I., Mishchuk, Y., Mishchuk, D., Ruchynskyi, M., Rogovskii, I., Mikhailova, L., Titova, L., Berezovyi, M., & Shatrov, R. (2021). Determiantion of energy characteristics of material destruction in the crushing chamber of the vibration crusher. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies. 4(7(112)): 41–49. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2021.239292
15. Nykyforchyn, H., Lunarska, E., & Tsyrulnyk, O. (2019). Environmentally assisted “in-bulk” steel degradation of long term service gas trunkline. Engineering Failure Analysis 17: 624–632.
16. Pisarenko, G., Voinalovych, O., Rogovskii, I., & Motrich, M. (2019). Probability of boundary exhaustion of resources as factor of operational safety for agricultural aggregates. Engineering for rural development 18: 291–298.
17. Rejovitzky, E., & Altus, E. (2013). On single damage variable models for fatigue. International Journal of Damage Mechanics 22(2) 2: 268–284.
18. Rogovskii, I. 2020. Algorithmicly determine the frequency of recovery of agricultural machinery according to degree of resource's costs. Machinery & Energetics. Journal of Rural Production Research 11(1): 155–162.
19. Rogovskii, I., Titova, L., Novitskii, A., & Rebenko, V. (2019). Research of vibroacoustic diagnostics of fuel system of engines of combine harvesters. Engineering for rural development 18: 291–298.
20. Rogovskii, I.L., Titova, L.L., Voinash, S.A., Troyanovskaya, I.P., & Sokolova, V.A. (2021). Change of technical condition and productivity of grain harvesters depending on term of operation. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science 720: 012110. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/720/1/012110
21. Rogovskii, I.L., Titova, L.L., Gumenyuk Yu.O., & Nadtochiy O.V. (2021). Technological effectiveness of formation of planting furrow by working body of passive type of orchard planting machine. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science 839: 052055. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/839/5/052055.
22. Sánchez-Hermosilla, J., Rincón, V., & Páez, F. (2011). Field evaluation of a self-propelled sprayer and effects of the application rate on spray deposition and losses to the ground. Pest Management Science 67(8): 942–947.
23. Shih-Heng, T., Ming-Hsiang, S., & Wen-Pei, S. (2018). Development of digital image correlation method to analyse crack variations of masonry wall. Sadhana 6: 767–779.
24. Tyutrin, S. (2019). Improving reliability of parts of mounted mower according to monitoring results by fatigue gauges from tin foil. Engineering for rural development 18: 22–27.
25. Voinalovych, O., Hnatiuk, O., Rogovskii, I., & Pokutnii, O. (2019). Probability of traumatic situations in mechanized processes in agriculture using mathematical apparatus of Markov chain method. Engineering for rural development 18: 563–569.
26. Xi, L., & Songlin, Z. (2019). Changes in mechanical properties of vehicle components after strengthening under low-amplitude loads below the fatigue limit. Fatigue and Fracture of Engineering Materials and Structures 32(10): 847–855.
27. Yezekyan, T., Marinello, F., Armentano, G., Trestini, S. & Sartori, L. (2020). Modelling of harvesting machines’ technical parameters and prices. Agriculture 10(6): 194–204.
28. Zou, F., Kang, J., Xiao, M., & Ji, G. (2017). Hydrostatic driving system for self-propelled sprayer. Engineering Journal 26(3): 12–18.
29. Zubko, V., Sirenko, V., Kuzina, T., Koszel, M., & Shchur, T. (2022). Modelling wheat grain flow during sowing based on the model of grain with shifted center of gravity. Agricultural Engineeringthis link is disabled 26(1): 25–37.
Published
2022-12-10
How to Cite
Titova, L. L., & Nadtochiy, O. V. (2022). ENGINEERING MANAGEMENT OF INFLUENCE OF PERFORMANCE INDICATORS OF RELIABILITY AND MAINTAINABILITY OF GRAIN HARVESTER ON EFFICIENCY OF ITS MACHINE USER. Bulletin of Sumy National Agrarian University. The Series: Mechanization and Automation of Production Processes, (2(48), 76-82. https://doi.org/10.32845/msnau.2022.2.11