ENGINEERING MANAGEMENT OF THE ALGORITHMIC FORMATION OF COMBINE COLLECTION OF GRAIN
Abstract
The article formulates methodical approaches of engineering management regarding the algorithmic formation of combine harvesting of grain. In order to calculate the structure of the harvester fleet of specific farms, rather than the entire region, we proposed the following methodological provisions: the overall efficiency of the harvester fleet was evaluated in general for the harvesting season, and not because it was previously accepted to evaluate the work of one harvester, and its assessment was generalized for the entire fleet of harvesters. For large-scale grain production with a high rate of harvesting, this is unacceptable, since harvesters of different classes, with different annual loadings, can participate in harvesting, and generalizing the work of one harvester to the entire fleet gives a false result; did not take into account the general dynamics of grain losses from selfshedding, but specifically for each type of grain, taking into account the dynamics of grain yield on the remaining area after each day of harvesting; the gross harvest of grain in the farm was assessed not according to the average yield at the end of harvesting, but as a set of private gross harvests of grain for each calendar day of harvesting during the entire harvesting period, which depends on the pace of harvesting and daily losses of grain; a new concept was introduced – the efficiency factor of the combine park, and of two types. The authors developed a model of the formation of the total gross collection of grain in an analytical form, the following assumptions and limitations were adopted: the productivity of the harvester was determined taking into account the coefficient of utilization of the operating time of the harvester during the day, that is, taking into account downtime for technological, organizational and technical reasons, which corresponds to the real situation; the dynamics of grain yield reduction due to self-shedding is adopted for each culture and variety individually according to the data of experimental studies; the residual yield is determined after each day of harvester operation on the residual harvesting area; the rate of self-shedding of grain on the first and last day of harvesting (rate of losses) is taken based on the ratio of the working time of the harvesters on this day and the duration of work during the day; mechanical losses of grain by combine harvesters are accepted as normative, i.e. no more than 2% of threshed grain or according to control threshing; the hours of operation of harvesters during the day during the entire period of harvesting are assumed to be the same (a possible exception is for the last day of harvesting). The obtained results, as a perspective for further research, can be used by agricultural farms when equipping the combine machine park with both domestic and imported models of grain harvesters.
References
2. Ding, Y., Wang, X., Peng, J., & Xia, Z. (2020). Visual navigation system for wheel-type grain combine harvester. Smart Agriculture 2: 89−102.
3. Dong, H., Chen, C., Wang, W., Peng, S., Hang, J., Cui, K., & Nie, L. (2017). The growth and yield of a wet-seeded rice-ratoon rice system in central China. Field Crops Research. 208: 55−59.
4. Fu, J., Zhang, G., Xie, G., Wang, Y., Gao, Y., & Zhou, Y. (2020). Development of double-channel feeding harvester for ratoon rice. CSAE 36: 11−20.
5. Hrynkiv, A., Rogovskii, I., Aulin, V., Lysenko, S., Titova, L., Zagurskіy, O., & Kolosok, I. (2020). Development of a system for determining the informativeness of the diagnosing parameters of the cylinder-piston group of the diesel engines in operation. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies 3 (5(105)): 19−29. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2020.206073.
6. Kuzmich, I.M., Rogovskii, I.L., Titova, L.L., & Nadtochiy, O.V. (2021). Research of passage capacity of combine harvesters depending on agrobiological state of bread mass. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science 677: 052002. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/677/5/052002
7. Lopes, G.T., Magalhães, P.S.G., & Nóbrega, E.G.O. (2002). Ae-automation and engineering technologies: Optimal header height control system for combine harvesters. Biosystem Engineering 81: 261−272.
8. Nadtochiy, O. & Titova, L. (2018). Simulation of agricultural processes. TEKA 18(2): 39−49.
9. Najafi, P., Asoodar, M., Marzban, A., & Hormozi, M. (2015). Reliability analysis of agricultural machinery: A case study of sugarcane chopper harvester. AgricEngInt: CIGR Journal March 17(1)1: 158–165.
10. Nazarenko, I., Dedov, O., Bernyk, I., Rogovskii, I., Bondarenko, A., Zapryvoda, A., & Titova, L. (2020). Study of stability of modes and parameters of motion of vibrating machines for technological purpose. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies 6 (7(108)): 71−79. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2020.217747
11. Nazarenko, I., Mishchuk, Y., Mishchuk, D., Ruchynskyi, M., Rogovskii, I., Mikhailova, L., Titova, L., Berezovyi, M., & Shatrov, R. (2021). Determiantion of energy characteristics of material destruction in the crushing chamber of the vibration crusher. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies. 4(7(112)): 41–49. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2021.239292
12. Pisarenko, G., Voinalovych, O., Rogovskii, I., & Motrich, M. (2019). Probability of boundary exhaustion of resources as factor of operational safety for agricultural aggregates. Engineering for rural development 18: 291–298.
13. Rogovskii, I. 2020. Algorithmicly determine the frequency of recovery of agricultural machinery according to degree of resource's costs. Machinery & Energetics. Journal of Rural Production Research 11(1): 155–162.
14. Rogovskii, I., Titova, L., Novitskii, A., & Rebenko, V. (2019). Research of vibroacoustic diagnostics of fuel system of engines of combine harvesters. Engineering for rural development 18: 291–298.
15. Rogovskii, I.L., Titova, L.L., Gumenyuk, Yu.O., & Nadtochiy, O.V. (2021a). Technological effectiveness of formation of planting furrow by working body of passive type of orchard planting machine. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science 839: 052055. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/839/5/052055
16. Rogovskii, I.L., Titova, L.L., Voinash, S.A., Troyanovskaya, I.P., & Sokolova, V.A. (2021b). Change of technical condition and productivity of grain harvesters depending on term of operation. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science 720: 012110. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/720/1/012110
17. Voinalovych, O., Hnatiuk, O., Rogovskii, I., & Pokutnii, O. (2019). Probability of traumatic situations in mechanized processes in agriculture using mathematical apparatus of Markov chain method. Engineering for rural development 18: 563–569.
18. Wang, Z., Che, D., Bai, X., & Hu, H. (2018). Improvement and experiment of cleaning loss rate monitoring device for corn combine harvester. CSAM 49: 100−108.
19. Yezekyan, T., Marinello, F., Armentano, G., Trestini, S. & Sartori, L. (2020). Modelling of harvesting machines’ technical parameters and prices. Agriculture 10(6): 194−204.
20. Zubko, V., Sirenko, V., Kuzina, T., Koszel, M., & Shchur, T. (2022). Modelling wheat grain flow during sowing based on the model of grain with shifted center of gravity. Agricultural Engineeringthis link is disabled 26(1): 25−37.