BIOSAFETY AS A FACTOR OF EFFICIENT FUNCTIONING OF PIG FARMS

Keywords: pig breeding, biosafety, infectious diseases of pigs, vaccine prevention

Abstract

Pig farming is a widely represented branch of animal husbandry in Ukraine. However, in recent years, there has been a steady trend towards a decrease in both commercial and breeding pigs in farms of all forms of ownership of various production capacities. Accordingly, compliance with biosecurity measures in farms to prevent outbreaks of infectious diseases among livestock becomes extremely urgent. In addition to high-tech equipment, the availability of professional personnel to perform technological operations is the key to preventing biological hazards of any kind from entering the territory of pig farms. After conducting an analysis of the existing complex of implemented biosecurity measures in one of the pig farms of the Chernivtsi region, it was established that the "human factor" is the weak link in the system of biosecurity measures of the farm. In the farm, the possibility of ingress of biological agents with feed was taken under control, the ventilation system of production premises in all reared age groups of animals was adjusted. Outsiders not directly related to the production process are not allowed on the territory of the complex, however, violations of the regimes of stay in the "clean" and "dirty" zones, production premises of individual employees of the complex have been established. The farm has established a clear system of measures to prevent pathogens from entering the territory of the livestock farm from the outside, which currently allows the farm to position itself as free from the main specific pathogens. According to international standards, this farm has SPF status (red level). A clear scheme of vaccine prophylaxis functions and is strictly followed in the farm, which also additionally serves as one of the important factors of maintaining biosecurity. Various age groups of animals are covered by vaccine prophylaxis. Special emphasis is placed on vaccination of farrowing sows. Accordingly, effective means are the maximum introduction of European pork production technologies, where the influence of the human factor is minimized.

References

1. Alarcón, L. V., Allepuz, A. & Mateu, E. (2021). Biosecurity in pig farms: a review. Porc Health Manag 7, 5. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40813-020-00181-z
2. Amass, S. F., Halbur, P. G., Byrne, B. A., Schneider, J. L., Koons, C. W., Cornick, N., & Ragland, D. (2003). Mechanical transmission of enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli to weaned pigs by people, and biosecurity procedures that prevented such transmission. Journal of Swine Health and Production, 11, 61– 68.
3. Andico, Jr. W.V., & S.T., Peña Jr. (2019). Biosecurity practices in high throughput Philippine backyard pig herds: a multiple correspondence analysis. Inter. Vet. Sci., 8 (4), 316–323.
4. Baslyman, M., Rezaee, R., Amyot, D., Mouttham, A., Chreyh, R., & Geiger, G. (2015). Real-time and location-based hand hygiene monitoring and notification: proof-of-concept system and experimentation. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing. 19 (3). 667–688.
5. Berckmans, D., Hemeryck, Vranken, E, & van, Waterschoot T. (2015). Animal sound… talks! Realtime sound analysis for health monitoring in livestock. International Symposium on Animal Environment and Welfare, 23–26 October, Chongqing, China. 215–222.
6. Better Training for Safer Food European Commission Consumers Health (2018). Agriculture and Food Executive Agency Belgrade, 6–8 November.
7. Correia-Gomes, C., Henry, M. K., Auty, H. K., & Gunn, G. J. (2017). Exploring the role of small-scale livestock keepers for national biosecuritythe pig case. Prev. Vet. Med. 145, 7–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prevetmed.2017.06.005
8. Cuong, N. V., Padungtod, P., Thwaites, G. & CarriqueMas, J.J. (2018). Antimicrobial usage in animal production: A review of the literature with a focus on low-and middle-income countries. Antibiotics, 7(3): 75.
9. Dewulf J., & Van, Immerseel F. (2018). General principles of biosecurity in animal production and veterinary medicine. Biosecurity in animal production and veterinary medicine. 1st ed. Leuven, Belgium: Acco, 63–76.
10. FAO/ OIE/ World bank. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations/World Organisation for Animal Health/World Bank. (2010). Good practices for biosecurity in the pig sector – Issues and options in developing and transition countries. FAO Animal Production and Health Paper. FAO, Rome. 169.
11. FAO/WB/OIE. (2009). Good practices for biosecurity in the pig sector: Issues and options in developing and in transition countries. 2009. 82.
12. Geurts, V., Díaz, I., & Collel-Surinach, M. (2018). B-eSecure: electronic system to measure and improve biosecurity on pig farms. 10th European Symposium of Porcine Health Management; 19–11 May; Barcelona, Spain. 58.
13. Hartung, T. (2010). Comparative analysis of the revised Directive 2010/63/EU for the protection of laboratory animals with its predecessor 86/609/EEC– a t4 report. ALTEX, 27(4), 285–303. doi: 10.14573/altex.2010.4.285
14. Hopka M. (2023). With what pig breeding of Ukraine and the world entered the year 2023. Retrieved from: https://agrotimes.ua/opinion/z-chym-svynarstvo-ukrayiny-j-svitu-uvijshlo-u-2023-rik/ (in Ukrainian).
15. Labrecque, J., & Rivest, J. (2018). A real-time sow behavior analysis system to predict an optimal timing for insemination. 10th International Livestock Environment Symposium; 26 September; Omaha, Nebraska, USA; 2018
16. Marek Špink (2012). Social dimension of emotions and its implication for animal welfare Applied. Animal Behaviour Science. 138, 3–4, 170–181 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2012.02.005
17. Michael, Greger (2007). The Human/Animal Interface: Emergence and Resurgence of Zoonotic Infectious Diseases, Critical Reviews in Microbiology. 33 243–299.
18. Noremark, M., Frossling, J., & Lewerin, S. S. (2010). Application of routines that contribute to on-farm biosecurity as reported by swedish livestock farmers. Transbound. Emerg. Dis. 2010, 57, 225–236. https://doi.org/10.1111/ j.1865-1682.2010.01140.x
19. Nurmoja, I., Motus, K., Kristian, M., Niine, T., Schulz, K., Depner, K., & Viltrop, A. (2020). Epidemiological analysis of the 2015–2017. African swine fever outbreaks in Estonia. Prev. Vet. Med. 181, 104556. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prevetmed.2018.10.001
20. Okoth, E., Gallardo, C., Macharia, J. M.; Omore, A., Pelayo, V., Bulimo, D. W., Arias, M., Kitala, P., Baboon, K., & Lekolol, I. (2013). Comparison of African swine fever virus prevalence and risk in two contrasting pig-farming systems in south-west and central Kenya. Prev. Vet. Med. 110, 198–205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prevetmed.2012.11.012
21. Pritchard, G., Dennis, I., & Waddilove, J. (2005). Biosecurity: reducing disease risks to pig breeding herds. In Practice, 27, 230–237.
22. Ribbens, S., Dewulf, J., Koenen, F., Mintiens, K., De Sadeleer, L, de Kruif, A. & Maes, D. (2008). A survey on biosecurity and management practices in Belgian pig herds. Prev. Vet. Med., 83(3–4). 228–241.
23. Ribbens, S., J., Dewulf., F., Koenen, K., Mintiens, L., De Sadeleer, A. de Kruif, & D. Maes (2008). A survey on biosecurity and management practices in Belgian pig herds. Prev. Vet. Med., 83, 228–241.
24. Sasaki, Y., Furutani, A., Furuichi, T., Hayakawa, Y., Ishizeki, S., Kano, R., Koike, F., Miyashita, M., Mizukami, Y., Watanabe, Y., Otake, S. & P-JET. (2020). Development of a biosecurity assessment tool and the assessment of biosecurity levels by this tool on Japanese commercial swine farms. Prev. Vet. Med., 175, 104–128.
25. Silva, G. S., Leotti, V. B., Castro, S. M. J., Medeiros, A. A. R., Silva, A., Linhares, D. C. L., & Corbellini, L.G. (2019). Assessment of biosecurity practices and development of a scoring system in swine farms using item response theory. Prev. Vet. Med. 167, 128–136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prevetmed.2019.03.02
26. Simon-Grifé, M., G., Martín-Valls, M., Vilar, I., García Bocanegra, M., Martín, E., & Mateu, J. Casal (2013). Biosecurity practices in Spanish pig herds: Perceptions of farmers and veterinarians of the most important biosecurity measures. Prev. Vet. Med., 110, 223–231.
27. The Association of Pig Breeders of Ukraine has published the assets of the industry (2023). Retrieved from: http://asu.pigua.info/news/1287/?type=asu (in Ukrainian).
28. The number of livestock in the farms of commodity producers (2023). Retrieved from: https://www.kmu.gov.ua/news/minahropolityky-zaklykaie-tovarovyrobnykiv-aktualizuvaty-dani-shchodo-kilkosti-naiavnoho-poholivia-sh-tvaryn (in Ukrainian).
29. Victor, M., Andres, & Rob H., Davies (2015). Biosecurity Measures to Control Salmonella and Other Infectious Agents in Pig Farms: Comprehensive Review in Food sciense and food safety. 14 (4).317-335 https://doi.org/10.1111/1541-4337.12137
30. Viltrop, A., Reimus, K., Niine, T., & Mõtus, K. (2022). Biosecurity Levels and Farm Characteristics of African Swine Fever Outbreak and Unaffected Farms in Estonia-What Can Be Learned from Them? Animals. 12, 68. https://doi.org/ 10.3390/ani12010068
Published
2023-09-19
How to Cite
L. V., N., & A. M., T. (2023). BIOSAFETY AS A FACTOR OF EFFICIENT FUNCTIONING OF PIG FARMS. Bulletin of Sumy National Agrarian University. The Series: Veterinary Medicine, (2(61), 34-38. https://doi.org/10.32782/bsnau.vet.2023.2.4