EFFECTIVENESS OF TREATMENT OF TURKEYS USING PROBIOTICS

Keywords: poultry, pathogenic microorganisms, microflora, probiotics, E. coli, St. aureus, Proteus.

Abstract

To increase the competitiveness of poultry farming, obtaining and selling organic products, for which consumer demand is constantly growing, is relevant today. An important element in poultry farming is the responsible use of antibacterial drugs. Treatment of turkeys from diseases of infectious etiology is usually carried out with the use of antibacterial drugs, including antibiotics. The effect of antibiotics extends not only to pathogenic microorganisms that cause diseases, but also to beneficial microflora, which can subsequently affect the quality of turkey meat. The use of probiotic drugs simultaneously with antibiotics allows to neutralize the negative effect of the use of antibacterial drugs and contributes to the improvement of quality indicators of slaughter products. Meat is a favorable environment for the development of microorganisms. When animals are slaughtered, the meat usually contains different amounts of microorganisms. There are two ways of insemination of meat: exogenous (occurs during animal slaughter and processing of carcasses) and endogenous (occurs mainly as a result of diseases). Research was carried out on the basis of the Department of Virology, Pathanatomy and Poultry Diseases of the Faculty of Veterinary Medicine of the Sumy National Agrarian University. The article presents data on microflora studies of slaughter products from sick and healthy birds, as well as birds that were treated with a probiotic based on recombinant strains of lactic acid microorganisms, symbionts of the bird's intestine: Bifidobacterium bifidum, Bacillus thermophilus, Bacillus coagulance, Bacillus subtilis. According to microbiological indicators, the slaughter products of sick birds differ significantly from the indicators of healthy birds. In these samples, we found bacteria of the Escherichia coli group, St. aureus, bacteria of the genus Proteus, with biochemical properties characteristic of these cultures. Also, the indicator of the number of mesophilic aerobic and facultative anaerobic microorganisms in the experimental group, where probiotics were not applied, was probably higher than the normative values, which indicates a negative impact on meat safety indicators. However, the meat samples obtained from the birds of the second experimental group, in which probiotics were used, probably did not differ from the normative values inherent in the control group, in which healthy birds were kept, which indicates the effectiveness of the proposed probiotic preparation.

References

1. Abd El-Ghany, W. A., Shaalan, M., & Salem, H. M. (2021). Nanoparticles applications in poultry production: an updated review. World's Poultry Science Journal, 77(4), 1001-1025.
2. Argudín, M. A., Tenhagen, B. A., Fetsch, A., Sachsenröder, J., Käsbohrer, A., Schroeter, A., Hammerl, J. A., Hertwig, S., Helmuth, R., Bräunig, J., Mendoza, M. C., Appel, B., Rodicio, M. R., & Guerra, B. (2011). Virulence and resistance determinants of German Staphylococcus aureus ST398 isolates from nonhuman sources. Applied and environmental microbiology, 77(9), 3052–3060. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.02260-10
3. Bakhtiary, F., Sayevand, H. R., Remely, M., Hippe, B., Hosseini, H., & Haslberger, A. G. (2016). Evaluation of bacterial contamination sources in meat production line. Journal of food quality, 39(6), 750-756.
4. Brant, A. W. (1998). A brief history of the turkey 1. World's Poultry Science Journal, 54(4), 365-373.
5. Clark, B., Stewart, G. B., Panzone, L. A., Kyriazakis, I., & Frewer, L. J. (2016). A systematic review of public attitudes, perceptions and behaviours towards production diseases associated with farm animal welfare. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, 29(3), 455-478.
6. Cui, S., Ge, B., Zheng, J., & Meng, J. (2005). Prevalence and antimicrobial resistance of Campylobacter spp. and Salmonella serovars in organic chickens from Maryland retail stores. Applied and environmental microbiology, 71(7), 4108-4111.
7. El Jeni, R., Dittoe, D. K., Olson, E. G., Lourenco, J., Corcionivoschi, N., Ricke, S. C., & Callaway, T. R. (2021). Probiotics and potential applications for alternative poultry production systems. Poultry science, 100(7), 101156.
8. El-Saadony, M. T., Zabermawi, N. M., Zabermawi, N. M., Burollus, M. A., Shafi, M. E., Alagawany, M., ... & Abd El-Hack, M. E. (2023). Nutritional aspects and health benefits of bioactive plant compounds against infectious diseases: a review. Food Reviews International, 39(4), 2138-2160.
9. European Food Safety Authority (EFSA), Costa, G., Di Piazza, G., Koevoets, P., Iacono, G., Liebana, E., ... & Rossi, M. (2022). Guidelines for reporting Whole Genome Sequencing‐based typing data through the EFSA One Health WGS System (Vol. 19, No. 6, p. 7413E).
10. Fotina, T. I., & Sergeychik, T. V. (2022). Monitoring of risk factors on farms to keep chicken broilers. Bulletin of Sumy National Agrarian University. The Series: Veterinary Medicine, (1 (56), 31-36. https://doi.org/10.32845/bsnau.vet.2022.1.5
11. Goetghebeur, M., Landry, P. A., Han, D., & Vicente, C. (2007). Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: a public health issue with economic consequences. Canadian Journal of Infectious Diseases and Medical Microbiology, 18, 27-34.
12. Kytaieva, D., & Petrov, R. (2020). The use of probiotics in the cultivation of turkeys. Scientific Messenger of LNU of Veterinary Medicine and Biotechnologies. Series: Veterinary Sciences, 22(100), 23-27. https://doi.org/10.32718/nvlvet10004
13. Liu, C., Bayer, A., Cosgrove, S. E., Daum, R. S., Fridkin, S. K., Gorwitz, R. J., Kaplan, S. L., Karchmer, A. W., Levine, D. P., Murray, B. E., J Rybak, M., Talan, D. A., Chambers, H. F., & Infectious Diseases Society of America (2011). Clinical practice guidelines by the infectious diseases society of america for the treatment of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infections in adults and children. Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America, 52(3), e18–e55. https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciq146
14. Liu, Z., Fotina, T. I., Petrov, R. V., Fotin, A. I., & Ma, J. (2022). Construction and characterization of stee deletion mutant of Salmonella Pullorum. Bulletin of Sumy National Agrarian University. The Series: Veterinary Medicine, (2(57), 9-15. https://doi.org/10.32845/bsnau.vet.2022.2.2
15. Mohamed, N., Timofeyeva, Y., Jamrozy, D., Rojas, E., Hao, L., Silmon de Monerri, N. C., Hawkins, J., Singh, G., Cai, B., Liberator, P., Sebastian, S., Donald, R. G. K., Scully, I. L., Jones, C. H., Creech, C. B., Thomsen, I., Parkhill, J., Peacock, S. J., Jansen, K. U., Holden, M. T. G., … Anderson, A. S. (2019). Molecular epidemiology and expression of capsular polysaccharides in Staphylococcus aureus clinical isolates in the United States. PloS one, 14(1), e0208356. https://doi. org/10.1371/journal.pone.0208356
16. Mountzouris, K. C., Balaskas, C., Xanthakos, I., Tzivinikou, A., & Fegeros, K. (2009). Effects of a multi-species probiotic on biomarkers of competitive exclusion efficacy in broilers challenged with Salmonella enteritidis. British poultry science, 50(4), 467-478.
17. Nahed, A., Abd El-Hack, M. E., Albaqami, N. M., Khafaga, A. F., Taha, A. E., Swelum, A. A., ... & Elbestawy, A. R. (2022). Phytochemical control of poultry coccidiosis: a review. Poultry science, 101(1), 101542.
18. Nechyporenko, O., Berezovskyy, A., Fotina, T., Petrov, R., & Fotin, A. (2018). Efficiency of complex disinfecting measures in the conditions of poultry farm-ing. Scientific Messenger of LNU of Veterinary Medicine and Biotechnologies. Series: Veterinary Sciences, 20(92), 165-168. https://doi.org/10.32718/nvlvet9234
19. Paliy A.P., Gujvinska S.O., Livoshchenko L.P., Nalivayko L.I., Livoshchenko Ye.M., Risovaniy V.I., Dubin R.A., Berezhna N.V., Palii A.P., Petrov R.V. (2019). Specific composition of indigenous microflora (Lactobacillus spp., Bifidobacterium spp., Lactococcus spp.) in farm animals. Ukrainian Journal of Ecology, 10(1), 43-48. doi: 10.15421/2020_7
20. Paliy, A.P., Gujvinska, S.O., Kalashnyk, M.V., Ivleva, O.V., Petrov, R.V., Baidevliatov, Yu.A., Baidevliatova, Yu.V., Husiev, V.O., Hilko, S.M., Kiralhazi, I.I., Lohvynenko, M.V., Palii, A.P., Bakun, Yu.Yu. (2020). Development of technical regulations for the capsulated probiotic manufacture. Ukrainian Journal of Ecology, 2020, 10(5), 170-176, doi: 10.15421/2020_226
21. Petrov, V., Berezovskyi, A., & Petrov, R. (2023, May). Vyznachennia vydovoho skladu mikroflory v ptashnykakh. [Determination of species composition of microflora in poultry houses] In Conferences of LNU of Veterinary Medicine and Biotechnologies (pp. 99-100). https://doi.org/10.32718/konf.1-2.06.2023 [in Ukrainian]
22. Petrova, N .O., Nezhevelo, V.V., Klochko, A .M., Blyumska-Danko, K . V. & Cramar, R.I. (2017). Features and Problematic Aspects of Food Safety in the Integration of Ukraine into the EU. Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences, 12: 4787-4791 https://doi.org/10.36478/jeasci.2017.4787.4791; URL: https://medwelljournals.com/abstract/?doi=- jeasci.2017.4787.4791
23. Romanko, M., Ushkalov, V., Paliy, A., Paliy, A., Petrov, R., Livoshchenko, L., & Livoshchenko, Y. (2022). Physiological Activity of Salmonella spp. Bacteria After Lyophilization and Rehydration. Problems of Cryobiology and Cryomedicine, 32(2), 158–163. https://doi.org/10.15407/cryo32.02.158
24. Salim, H. M., Huque, K. S., Kamaruddin, K. M., & Haque Beg, A. (2018). Global restriction of using antibiotic growth promoters and alternative strategies in poultry production. Science progress, 101(1), 52-75.
25. Sato, K., Bartlett, P. C., Kaneene, J. B., & Downes, F. P. (2004). Comparison of prevalence and antimicrobial susceptibilities of Campylobacter spp. isolates from organic and conventional dairy herds in Wisconsin. Applied and environmental microbiology, 70(3), 1442-1447.
26. Setta, A., Salem, H. M., Elhady, M., El-Hussieny, A., & Arafa, A. S. (2018). Molecular and genetic characterization of infectious bronchitis viruses isolated from commercial chicken flocks in Egypt between 2014 and 2016. Journal of World's Poultry Research, 8(1), 1-7.
27. Soepranianondo, K., & Wardhana, D. K. (2019). Analysis of bacterial contamination and antibiotic residue of beef meat from city slaughterhouses in East Java Province, Indonesia. Veterinary world, 12(2), 243.
28. Sofos J. N. (2008). Challenges to meat safety in the 21st century. Meat science, 78(1-2), 3–13. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2007.07.027
29. Stone, D., Davis, M., Baker, K., Besser, T., Roopnarine, R., & Sharma, R. (2013). MLST genotypes and antibiotic resistance of Campylobacter spp. isolated from poultry in Grenada. BioMed research international, 2013, 794643. https:// doi.org/10.1155/2013/794643
30. Wang, Y., Zhang, S., Yu, J., Zhang, H., Yuan, Z., Sun, Y., ... & Song, H. (2010). An outbreak of Proteus mirabilis food poisoning associated with eating stewed pork balls in brown sauce, Beijing. Food Control, 21(3), 302-305.
31. Yang, Y., Iji, P. A., & Choct, M. (2009). Dietary modulation of gut microflora in broiler chickens: a review of the role of six kinds of alternatives to in-feed antibiotics. World's Poultry Science Journal, 65(1), 97-114.
32. Zhang, L., Zhang, R., Jia, H., Zhu, Z., Li, H., & Ma, Y. (2021). Supplementation of probiotics in water beneficial growth performance, carcass traits, immune function, and antioxidant capacity in broiler chickens. Open Life Sciences, 16(1), 311-322.
Published
2023-11-21
How to Cite
Marushko, D. V., & Petrov, R. V. (2023). EFFECTIVENESS OF TREATMENT OF TURKEYS USING PROBIOTICS. Bulletin of Sumy National Agrarian University. The Series: Veterinary Medicine, (3(62), 61-67. https://doi.org/10.32782/bsnau.vet.2023.3.8