ALTERNATIVE METHODS OF PREVENTION OF INFECTIOUS POULTRY DISEASES
Keywords:
poultry, probiotics, prebiotics, prevention, infection
Abstract
The article presents the results of analytical work of data from scientific publications, reports of the United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO), the European Food Safety Authority (ESFA) regarding the effectiveness of alternative methods of prevention of infectious poultry diseases. One of the biggest current problems in the world is the acquired resistance of microorganisms to antibacterial drugs, which in turn causes significant economic losses due to the low effectiveness of therapeutic measures. In connection with the general tendency to abandon the use of antibiotics, the use of new methods of controlling poultry bacteriosis is becoming more and more relevant. The search for an alternative to antibiotics activates the use of effective, natural, safe and cost-effective means of protecting the macroorganism from pathogens. The use of ecologically safe preparations is carried out according to the criteria of effective protection of the poultry organism from pathogenic and opportunistic pathogens, the naturalness and safety of the preparation, obtaining ecologically safe livestock products free from residues of toxic substances, antibacterial preparations and the economic efficiency of the measures taken. Alternative methods of prevention of infectious diseases of poultry are implemented on the basis of the use of environmentally safe drugs (probiotics, prebiotics, eubiotics). Probiotic cultures of microorganisms exhibit antagonistic properties relative to certain strains of pathogenic and opportunistic microorganisms, capable of producing substances that stimulate the growth of beneficial intestinal microorganisms, improve feed conversion and increase performance indicators. Prebiotics create conditions for the reproduction of beneficial intestinal microorganisms and adsorb pathogens of the intestinal microbiome. The use of enzymes, probiotics, prebiotics, synbiotics and phytobiotics in the process of growing poultry has shown positive results due to increasing their productivity and obtaining high-quality and safe poultry products. These drugs are effective means of prevention and treatment of diseases of infectious etiology through stimulation of nonspecific immunity, correction of dysbacteriosis during stress, and also as an alternative to antibiotics.
References
1. Abbas, A, Rizvi, F. and Hussain, S. (2021). Immuno-modulatory effects of Lactobacillus in Salmonella Gallinarum infected broiler chicks. Pak J Sci 73(1):77.
2. Adhikari B., Kwon Y.M. (2017). Characterization of the culturable subpopulations of Lactobacillus in the chicken intestinal tract as a resource for probiotic development. Front. Microbiol. 8:1389.
3. Adnan, Mehmood, Muhammad, Nawaz, Masood, Rabbani and Muhammad, Hassan Mushtaq (2023). Probiotic Effect of Limosilactobacillus fermentum on Growth Performance and Competitive Exclusion of Salmonella Gallinarum in Poultry. Pak Vet J, 2023, 43(4): 659-664
4. Alonso, S., Carmen Castro, M. and Berdasco, M. (2019). Isolation and partial characterization of lactic acid bacteria from the gut microbiota of marine fishes for potential application as probiotics in aquaculture. Probiotics Antimicrob Proteins 11:569-579. Al-Razem F, Al-Aloul H, Ishnaiwer M, et al., 2022. Isolation and partial characterization of Salmonella Gallinarum bacteriophage. Saudi J Biol Sci 29(5):3308-3312.
5. Al-Qazzaz, M.F.A., Ismail, D., Akit, H., and Idris, L.H. (2016). Effect of using insect larvae meal as a complete protein source on quality and productivity characteristics of laying hens. Rev. Bras. De Zootec. 45:518–523.
6. Andino, A. and Hanning, I. (2015). Salmonella enterica: survival, colonization, and virulence differences among serovars. Sci World J :2015:1-16.
7. Anonymous, 2018. Fowl typhoid and pullorum disease. OIE Terrestial Manual. Chapter. 3(2):719-735.
8. Asghar, S., Arif, M., and Nawaz, M. (2016). Selection, characterisation and evaluation of potential probiotic Lactobacillus spp. isolated from poultry droppings. Benef Microbes 7(1):35-44.
9. Aziz, N.H., Khidhir,,Z., Hama, Z.O., and Mustafa, N. (2020). Influence of probiotic (Miaclost) supplementation on carcass yield, chemical composition and meat quality of broiler chick. J. Appl. Poultry Prod. 11:9–12.
10. Bortoluzzi, C., Serpa Vieira B., de Paula Dorigam J.C., Menconi A., Sokale A., Doranalli K. and Applegate T.J. (2019). Bacillus subtilis DSM 32315 supplementation attenuates the effects of Clostridium perfringens challenge on the growth performance and intestinal microbiota of broiler chickens. Microorganisms. 7:71.
11. Buntyn, J., Schmidt, T., Nisbet, D., Callaway, T., Lewin, H., and Roberts, R. (2016). The role of direct-fed microbials in conventional livestock production. Annu. Rev. Anim. Biosci. 4:335–355.
12. Chen, C., Li, J, and Zhang, H. (2020). Effects of a probiotic on the growth performance, intestinal flora, and immune function of chicks infected with Salmonella pullorum. Poult Sci 99(11): 5316-5323.
13. Cui, X., Marshall, B., Shi, N., Chen, S.-Y., Rekaya R. and Liu H.-X. (2017). RNA-Seq analysis on chicken taste sensory organs: An ideal system to study organogenesis. Sci. Rep. 7:9131.
14. de Souza, O.F., Vecchi, B. and Gumina, E. (2022). Development and evaluation of a commercial direct-fed microbial (zymospore®) on the fecal microbiome and growth performance of broiler chickens under experimental challenge conditions. Animals 12(11):1436.
15. Dittoe, D.K., McDaniel, C.D., Tabler, T. and Kiess, A.S. (2018). Windrowing poultry litter after a broiler house has been sprinkled with water. J. Appl. Poult. Res. 27:1–15.
16. Dittoe, D.K., S.C. Ricke, and Kiess A.S. (2020). Chapter 1. Commercial poultry production and gut function – Historical perspective. Pages. 3–30 in Improving Gut Function in Poultry. S.C. Ricke, ed. Burleigh Dodd Publishing, Cambridge, UK.
17. Dos Santos, C.I., Campos, CD. and Nunes-Neto, WR. (2021). Genomic analysis of Limosilactobacillus fermentum ATCC 23271, a potential probiotic strain with anti-Candida activity. J Fungi 7(10):794.
18. El, Jeni, R., Dittoe, DK., and Olson, EG. (2021). Probiotics and potential applications for alternative poultry production systems. Poult Sci 100(7):101156.
19. El-Saadony, MT., Salem, HM., El-Tahan, AM. (2022). The control of poultry salmonellosis using organic agents: an updated overview. Poult Sci 101(4):101716.
20. FAO/WHO, 2002. Agriculture Organization of the United Nations and World Health Organization Working Group: Joint FAO/WHO Working Group report on drafting guidelines for the evaluation of probiotics in Food.
21. Feye, K.M., Baxter, M.F.A., Tellez, G., Kogut, M.H. and Ricke, S.C. (2020). Influential factors on the composition of the conventionally raised broiler gastrointestinal microbiomes. Poult. Sci. 99:653–659.
22. Forte, C., Manuali, E., and Abbate, Y. (2018). Dietary Lactobacillus acidophilus positively influences growth performance, gut morphology, and gut microbiology in rurally reared chickens. Poult Sci 97(3), 930-936.
23. Gadde, U., Kim, W.H., Oh, S.T. and Lillehoj, H.S. (2017). Alternatives to antibiotics for maximizing growth performance and feed efficiency in poultry: a review. Anim. Health Res. Rev. 18:26–45.
24. Hai, D., Kong, L. and Lu, Z. (2021). Inhibitory effect of different chicken‐ derived lactic acid bacteria isolates on drug resistant Salmonella SE47 isolated from eggs. Lett Appl Microbiol 73(1): 54-63.
25. Hammershøj M., Johansen N.F. (2016). Review: the effect of grass and herbs in organic egg production on egg fatty acid composition, egg yolk colour and sensory properties. Livestock Sci. 194:37–43.
26. He, T., Long, S., Mahfuz, S., Wu D., Wang, X., Wei, X., Piao, X. (2019). Effects of probiotics as antibiotics substitutes on growth performance, serum biochemical parameters, intestinal morphology, and barrier function of broilers. Animals. 9:985–995.
27. Hedayati, M., Khalaji, S. and Manafi, M. (2022). Lactobacilli spp. and Zataria multiflora essence as antibiotic substituent on broiler health and performance parameters.
28. Khan, M., Anjum, AA., and Nawaz, M. (2019). Effect of newly characterized probiotic lactobacilli on weight gain, immunomodulation and gut microbiota of Campylobacter jejuni challenged broiler chicken. Pak Vet J 39(4):473-478.
29. Kulkarni, RR., Gaghan, C., and Gorrell, K. (2022). Probiotics as alternatives to antibiotics for the prevention and control of necrotic enteritis in chickens. Pathogens 11(6):692.
30. Li, Z., Wang, W., Liu, D. and Guo, Y. (2018). Effects of Lactobacillus acidophilus on the growth performance and intestinal health of broilers challenged with Clostridium perfringens. J. Anim. Sci. Biotechnol. 9:25.
31. Lokapirnasari, W.P., Pribadi, T.B., Al, Arif, A., Soeharsono, S., Hidanah, S., Harijani N., Najwan R., Huda K., Wardhani H.C.P. and Rahman N.F.N. (2019). Potency of probiotics Bifidobacterium spp. and Lactobacillus casei to improve growth performance and business analysis in organic laying hens. Vet. World. 12:860.
32. Lourenco, J. M., D. S. Seidel, and T. R. Callaway. 2019b. Antibiotics and gut function: historical and current perspectives. Pages 172–189 in S.C. Ricke, editor, Improving Gut Health in Poultry. Francis Dodds Science Publishing, Cambridge, UK.
33. Lourenco, J.M., Nunn, S.C., Lee, E., Dove, C.R., Callaway, T.R. and Azain M.J. (2020). Effect of supplemental protease on growth performance and excreta microbiome of broiler chicks. Microorganisms. 8:475.
34. Lourenco, J.M., Rothrock, M.J., Jr., Fluharty, F.L. and Callaway, T.R. (2019). The successional changes in the gut microbiome of pasture-raised chickens fed soy-containing and soy-free diets. Front. Sustain. Food Syst. 3:35.
35. Mehmood, A., Nawaz, M., Rabbani, M. (2023). In Vitro Characterization of Probiotic Potential of Limosilactobacillus fermentum against Salmonella Gallinarum Causing Fowl Typhoid. Animals 13(8):1284.
36. Mortada, M., Cosby, D.E., Shanmugasundaram, R. and Selvaraj R.K. (2020). In vivo and in vitro assessment of commercial probiotic and organic acid feed additives in broilers challenged with Campylobacter coli. J. Appl. Poult. Res. 29:435–446.
37. Mustafa, A., Nawaz, M., Rabbani, M. (2022). Characterization and evaluation of anti-Salmonella enteritidis activity of indigenous probiotic lactobacilli in mice. Open Life Sci 17(1):978-990.
38. Neveling, D.P., Ahire, J.J., Laubscher, W., Rautenbach, M. and Dicks, L.M. (2020). Genetic and phenotypic characteristics of a multi-strain probiotic for broilers. Curr. Microbiol.77:369–387.
39. Penha, RAC., Zancan, FT., Almeida, AMd (2018). Protection of chickens against fowl typhoid using field vaccine programs formulated with the live attenuated strain Salmonella Gallinarum ΔcobSΔcbiA. Arq Inst Biol 84:1-5.
40. Poole, T.L., Callaway, T.R., Norman, K.N., Scott, H.M., Loneragan, G.H., Ison, S.A., Beier, R.C., Harhay, D.M., Norby, B., and Nisbet, D.J. (2017). Transferability of antimicrobial resistance from multidrug-resistant Escherichia coli isolated from cattle in the USA to E. coli and Salmonella Newport recipients. J. Glob. Antimicrob. Resist.11:123–132.
41. Ramlucken, U., Ramchuran, S.O., Moonsamy, G., Lalloo, R., Thantsha, M.S., and Jansen van Rensburg, C. (2020). A novel Bacillus based multi-strain probiotic improves growth performance and intestinal properties of Clostridium perfringens challenged broilers. Poult. Sci. 99:331–341.
42. Rashid, S., Tahir, S. and Akhtar, T. (2023). Bacillus-based Probiotics: An antibiotic alternative for the treatment of salmonellosis in poultry. Pak Vet J 43(1):167-173.
43. Ricke, S.C. and Rothrock, M.J. (2020). Gastrointestinal microbiomes of broilers and layer hens in alternative production systems. Poult. Sci. 99:660–669.
44. Ricke, S.C., Lee S.I., Kim, S.A., Park, S.H. and Shi, Z. (2020). Prebiotics and the poultry gastrointestinal tract microbiome. Poult. Sci. 99:670–677.
45. Rodríguez-Sojo, MJ., Ruiz-Malagón, AJ., Rodríguez-Cabezas, ME. (2021). Limosilactobacillus fermentum CECT5716: mechanisms and therapeutic insights. Nutrients 13(3):1016.
46. Rothrock, M.J., Gibson, K.E., Micciche, A.C. and Ricke, S.C. (2019). Pastured poultry production in the united states: strategies to balance system sustainability and environmental impact. Front. Sustain. Food Syst. 3:74.
47. Shi, S., Zhou, D., Xu, Y. (2022). Effect of Lactobacillus reuteri S5 Intervention on intestinal microbiota composition of chickens challenged with Salmonella enteritidis. Animals 12(19):2528.
48. Shi, Z., Rothrock, M.J., Jr. and Ricke, S.C. (2019). Applications of microbiome analyses in alternative poultry broiler production systems. Front. Vet. Sci. ;6:157.
49. Sokale, A.O., Menconi, A., Mathis, G.F., Lumpkins, B., Sims, M.D., Whelan, R.A. and Doranalli, K. (2019). Effect of Bacillus subtilis DSM 32315 on the intestinal structural integrity and growth performance of broiler chickens under necrotic enteritis challenge. Poult. Sci.98:5392–5400.
50. Spickler, AR. (2019). Fowl typhoid and pullorum disease. http://www.cfsph.iastate.edu/diseaseInfo/factsheet. Wang M, Hu J, Yu H, et al., 2023. Lactobacillus fermentum 1.2133 display probiotic potential in vitro and protect against Salmonella pullorum in chicken of infection. Lett Appl Microbiol 76(1):ovac041.
51. Swaggerty, C.L., Callaway, T.R., Kogut, M.H., Piva, A. and Grilli, E. (2019). Modulation of the immune response to improve health and reduce foodborne pathogens in poultry. Microorganisms. 7:65.
52. Tarus, J., Rachuonyo, H., Omega, J. and Ochuodho, J. (2019). Assessment of aflatoxin levels in indigenous chicken tissues and eggs in Western Kenya. African J. Education, Sci. and Technol. 5:59–65.
53. US Egg and Poultry. 2020. US Hen Facts and Statistics for 2020. Accessed April 2021.
54. Vase-Khavari, K., Mortezavi, S.H., Rasouli, B., Khusro, A., Salem, A.Z.M. and Seidavi A. (2019). The effect of three tropical medicinal plants and superzist probiotic on growth performance, carcass characteristics, blood constitutes, immune response, and gut microflora of broiler. Trop. Anim. Health Prod. 51:33–42.
55. Wu, Y., Zhen, W., Geng, Y., Wang, Z. and Guo, Y. (2019). Pretreatment with probiotic Enterococcus faecium NCIMB 11181 ameliorates necrotic enteritis-induced intestinal barrier injury in broiler chickens. Sci. Rep. 9:10256–11061.
56. Yaşar, S., Okutan, İ. and Tosun, R. (2017). Testing novel eubiotic additives: its health and performance effects in commercially raised farm animals. Iğdır Univ. J. Inst. Sci. Tech. 7:297–308.
57. Yasmin, S., Nawaz, M. and Anjum, AA. (2019). Antibiotic susceptibility pattern of Salmonellae isolated from poultry from different Districts of Punjab, Pakistan. Pak Vet J 40:98-102.
58. Yazhini, P., Visha, P., Selvaraj, P., Vasanthakumar, P. and Chandran, V. (2018). Dietary encapsulated probiotic effect on broiler serum biochemical parameters. Vet. World. 11:1344–1348.
59. Zhou, C., Liang, J. and Jiang, W. (2020). The effect of a selected yeast fraction on the prevention of pullorum disease and fowl typhoid in commercial breeder chickens. Poult Sci 99(1):101-110.
60. Zhou, X., Kang, X., Zhou, K. (2022). A global dataset for prevalence of Salmonella Gallinarum between 1945 and 2021. Scientific Data 9(1):495-505.
2. Adhikari B., Kwon Y.M. (2017). Characterization of the culturable subpopulations of Lactobacillus in the chicken intestinal tract as a resource for probiotic development. Front. Microbiol. 8:1389.
3. Adnan, Mehmood, Muhammad, Nawaz, Masood, Rabbani and Muhammad, Hassan Mushtaq (2023). Probiotic Effect of Limosilactobacillus fermentum on Growth Performance and Competitive Exclusion of Salmonella Gallinarum in Poultry. Pak Vet J, 2023, 43(4): 659-664
4. Alonso, S., Carmen Castro, M. and Berdasco, M. (2019). Isolation and partial characterization of lactic acid bacteria from the gut microbiota of marine fishes for potential application as probiotics in aquaculture. Probiotics Antimicrob Proteins 11:569-579. Al-Razem F, Al-Aloul H, Ishnaiwer M, et al., 2022. Isolation and partial characterization of Salmonella Gallinarum bacteriophage. Saudi J Biol Sci 29(5):3308-3312.
5. Al-Qazzaz, M.F.A., Ismail, D., Akit, H., and Idris, L.H. (2016). Effect of using insect larvae meal as a complete protein source on quality and productivity characteristics of laying hens. Rev. Bras. De Zootec. 45:518–523.
6. Andino, A. and Hanning, I. (2015). Salmonella enterica: survival, colonization, and virulence differences among serovars. Sci World J :2015:1-16.
7. Anonymous, 2018. Fowl typhoid and pullorum disease. OIE Terrestial Manual. Chapter. 3(2):719-735.
8. Asghar, S., Arif, M., and Nawaz, M. (2016). Selection, characterisation and evaluation of potential probiotic Lactobacillus spp. isolated from poultry droppings. Benef Microbes 7(1):35-44.
9. Aziz, N.H., Khidhir,,Z., Hama, Z.O., and Mustafa, N. (2020). Influence of probiotic (Miaclost) supplementation on carcass yield, chemical composition and meat quality of broiler chick. J. Appl. Poultry Prod. 11:9–12.
10. Bortoluzzi, C., Serpa Vieira B., de Paula Dorigam J.C., Menconi A., Sokale A., Doranalli K. and Applegate T.J. (2019). Bacillus subtilis DSM 32315 supplementation attenuates the effects of Clostridium perfringens challenge on the growth performance and intestinal microbiota of broiler chickens. Microorganisms. 7:71.
11. Buntyn, J., Schmidt, T., Nisbet, D., Callaway, T., Lewin, H., and Roberts, R. (2016). The role of direct-fed microbials in conventional livestock production. Annu. Rev. Anim. Biosci. 4:335–355.
12. Chen, C., Li, J, and Zhang, H. (2020). Effects of a probiotic on the growth performance, intestinal flora, and immune function of chicks infected with Salmonella pullorum. Poult Sci 99(11): 5316-5323.
13. Cui, X., Marshall, B., Shi, N., Chen, S.-Y., Rekaya R. and Liu H.-X. (2017). RNA-Seq analysis on chicken taste sensory organs: An ideal system to study organogenesis. Sci. Rep. 7:9131.
14. de Souza, O.F., Vecchi, B. and Gumina, E. (2022). Development and evaluation of a commercial direct-fed microbial (zymospore®) on the fecal microbiome and growth performance of broiler chickens under experimental challenge conditions. Animals 12(11):1436.
15. Dittoe, D.K., McDaniel, C.D., Tabler, T. and Kiess, A.S. (2018). Windrowing poultry litter after a broiler house has been sprinkled with water. J. Appl. Poult. Res. 27:1–15.
16. Dittoe, D.K., S.C. Ricke, and Kiess A.S. (2020). Chapter 1. Commercial poultry production and gut function – Historical perspective. Pages. 3–30 in Improving Gut Function in Poultry. S.C. Ricke, ed. Burleigh Dodd Publishing, Cambridge, UK.
17. Dos Santos, C.I., Campos, CD. and Nunes-Neto, WR. (2021). Genomic analysis of Limosilactobacillus fermentum ATCC 23271, a potential probiotic strain with anti-Candida activity. J Fungi 7(10):794.
18. El, Jeni, R., Dittoe, DK., and Olson, EG. (2021). Probiotics and potential applications for alternative poultry production systems. Poult Sci 100(7):101156.
19. El-Saadony, MT., Salem, HM., El-Tahan, AM. (2022). The control of poultry salmonellosis using organic agents: an updated overview. Poult Sci 101(4):101716.
20. FAO/WHO, 2002. Agriculture Organization of the United Nations and World Health Organization Working Group: Joint FAO/WHO Working Group report on drafting guidelines for the evaluation of probiotics in Food.
21. Feye, K.M., Baxter, M.F.A., Tellez, G., Kogut, M.H. and Ricke, S.C. (2020). Influential factors on the composition of the conventionally raised broiler gastrointestinal microbiomes. Poult. Sci. 99:653–659.
22. Forte, C., Manuali, E., and Abbate, Y. (2018). Dietary Lactobacillus acidophilus positively influences growth performance, gut morphology, and gut microbiology in rurally reared chickens. Poult Sci 97(3), 930-936.
23. Gadde, U., Kim, W.H., Oh, S.T. and Lillehoj, H.S. (2017). Alternatives to antibiotics for maximizing growth performance and feed efficiency in poultry: a review. Anim. Health Res. Rev. 18:26–45.
24. Hai, D., Kong, L. and Lu, Z. (2021). Inhibitory effect of different chicken‐ derived lactic acid bacteria isolates on drug resistant Salmonella SE47 isolated from eggs. Lett Appl Microbiol 73(1): 54-63.
25. Hammershøj M., Johansen N.F. (2016). Review: the effect of grass and herbs in organic egg production on egg fatty acid composition, egg yolk colour and sensory properties. Livestock Sci. 194:37–43.
26. He, T., Long, S., Mahfuz, S., Wu D., Wang, X., Wei, X., Piao, X. (2019). Effects of probiotics as antibiotics substitutes on growth performance, serum biochemical parameters, intestinal morphology, and barrier function of broilers. Animals. 9:985–995.
27. Hedayati, M., Khalaji, S. and Manafi, M. (2022). Lactobacilli spp. and Zataria multiflora essence as antibiotic substituent on broiler health and performance parameters.
28. Khan, M., Anjum, AA., and Nawaz, M. (2019). Effect of newly characterized probiotic lactobacilli on weight gain, immunomodulation and gut microbiota of Campylobacter jejuni challenged broiler chicken. Pak Vet J 39(4):473-478.
29. Kulkarni, RR., Gaghan, C., and Gorrell, K. (2022). Probiotics as alternatives to antibiotics for the prevention and control of necrotic enteritis in chickens. Pathogens 11(6):692.
30. Li, Z., Wang, W., Liu, D. and Guo, Y. (2018). Effects of Lactobacillus acidophilus on the growth performance and intestinal health of broilers challenged with Clostridium perfringens. J. Anim. Sci. Biotechnol. 9:25.
31. Lokapirnasari, W.P., Pribadi, T.B., Al, Arif, A., Soeharsono, S., Hidanah, S., Harijani N., Najwan R., Huda K., Wardhani H.C.P. and Rahman N.F.N. (2019). Potency of probiotics Bifidobacterium spp. and Lactobacillus casei to improve growth performance and business analysis in organic laying hens. Vet. World. 12:860.
32. Lourenco, J. M., D. S. Seidel, and T. R. Callaway. 2019b. Antibiotics and gut function: historical and current perspectives. Pages 172–189 in S.C. Ricke, editor, Improving Gut Health in Poultry. Francis Dodds Science Publishing, Cambridge, UK.
33. Lourenco, J.M., Nunn, S.C., Lee, E., Dove, C.R., Callaway, T.R. and Azain M.J. (2020). Effect of supplemental protease on growth performance and excreta microbiome of broiler chicks. Microorganisms. 8:475.
34. Lourenco, J.M., Rothrock, M.J., Jr., Fluharty, F.L. and Callaway, T.R. (2019). The successional changes in the gut microbiome of pasture-raised chickens fed soy-containing and soy-free diets. Front. Sustain. Food Syst. 3:35.
35. Mehmood, A., Nawaz, M., Rabbani, M. (2023). In Vitro Characterization of Probiotic Potential of Limosilactobacillus fermentum against Salmonella Gallinarum Causing Fowl Typhoid. Animals 13(8):1284.
36. Mortada, M., Cosby, D.E., Shanmugasundaram, R. and Selvaraj R.K. (2020). In vivo and in vitro assessment of commercial probiotic and organic acid feed additives in broilers challenged with Campylobacter coli. J. Appl. Poult. Res. 29:435–446.
37. Mustafa, A., Nawaz, M., Rabbani, M. (2022). Characterization and evaluation of anti-Salmonella enteritidis activity of indigenous probiotic lactobacilli in mice. Open Life Sci 17(1):978-990.
38. Neveling, D.P., Ahire, J.J., Laubscher, W., Rautenbach, M. and Dicks, L.M. (2020). Genetic and phenotypic characteristics of a multi-strain probiotic for broilers. Curr. Microbiol.77:369–387.
39. Penha, RAC., Zancan, FT., Almeida, AMd (2018). Protection of chickens against fowl typhoid using field vaccine programs formulated with the live attenuated strain Salmonella Gallinarum ΔcobSΔcbiA. Arq Inst Biol 84:1-5.
40. Poole, T.L., Callaway, T.R., Norman, K.N., Scott, H.M., Loneragan, G.H., Ison, S.A., Beier, R.C., Harhay, D.M., Norby, B., and Nisbet, D.J. (2017). Transferability of antimicrobial resistance from multidrug-resistant Escherichia coli isolated from cattle in the USA to E. coli and Salmonella Newport recipients. J. Glob. Antimicrob. Resist.11:123–132.
41. Ramlucken, U., Ramchuran, S.O., Moonsamy, G., Lalloo, R., Thantsha, M.S., and Jansen van Rensburg, C. (2020). A novel Bacillus based multi-strain probiotic improves growth performance and intestinal properties of Clostridium perfringens challenged broilers. Poult. Sci. 99:331–341.
42. Rashid, S., Tahir, S. and Akhtar, T. (2023). Bacillus-based Probiotics: An antibiotic alternative for the treatment of salmonellosis in poultry. Pak Vet J 43(1):167-173.
43. Ricke, S.C. and Rothrock, M.J. (2020). Gastrointestinal microbiomes of broilers and layer hens in alternative production systems. Poult. Sci. 99:660–669.
44. Ricke, S.C., Lee S.I., Kim, S.A., Park, S.H. and Shi, Z. (2020). Prebiotics and the poultry gastrointestinal tract microbiome. Poult. Sci. 99:670–677.
45. Rodríguez-Sojo, MJ., Ruiz-Malagón, AJ., Rodríguez-Cabezas, ME. (2021). Limosilactobacillus fermentum CECT5716: mechanisms and therapeutic insights. Nutrients 13(3):1016.
46. Rothrock, M.J., Gibson, K.E., Micciche, A.C. and Ricke, S.C. (2019). Pastured poultry production in the united states: strategies to balance system sustainability and environmental impact. Front. Sustain. Food Syst. 3:74.
47. Shi, S., Zhou, D., Xu, Y. (2022). Effect of Lactobacillus reuteri S5 Intervention on intestinal microbiota composition of chickens challenged with Salmonella enteritidis. Animals 12(19):2528.
48. Shi, Z., Rothrock, M.J., Jr. and Ricke, S.C. (2019). Applications of microbiome analyses in alternative poultry broiler production systems. Front. Vet. Sci. ;6:157.
49. Sokale, A.O., Menconi, A., Mathis, G.F., Lumpkins, B., Sims, M.D., Whelan, R.A. and Doranalli, K. (2019). Effect of Bacillus subtilis DSM 32315 on the intestinal structural integrity and growth performance of broiler chickens under necrotic enteritis challenge. Poult. Sci.98:5392–5400.
50. Spickler, AR. (2019). Fowl typhoid and pullorum disease. http://www.cfsph.iastate.edu/diseaseInfo/factsheet. Wang M, Hu J, Yu H, et al., 2023. Lactobacillus fermentum 1.2133 display probiotic potential in vitro and protect against Salmonella pullorum in chicken of infection. Lett Appl Microbiol 76(1):ovac041.
51. Swaggerty, C.L., Callaway, T.R., Kogut, M.H., Piva, A. and Grilli, E. (2019). Modulation of the immune response to improve health and reduce foodborne pathogens in poultry. Microorganisms. 7:65.
52. Tarus, J., Rachuonyo, H., Omega, J. and Ochuodho, J. (2019). Assessment of aflatoxin levels in indigenous chicken tissues and eggs in Western Kenya. African J. Education, Sci. and Technol. 5:59–65.
53. US Egg and Poultry. 2020. US Hen Facts and Statistics for 2020. Accessed April 2021.
54. Vase-Khavari, K., Mortezavi, S.H., Rasouli, B., Khusro, A., Salem, A.Z.M. and Seidavi A. (2019). The effect of three tropical medicinal plants and superzist probiotic on growth performance, carcass characteristics, blood constitutes, immune response, and gut microflora of broiler. Trop. Anim. Health Prod. 51:33–42.
55. Wu, Y., Zhen, W., Geng, Y., Wang, Z. and Guo, Y. (2019). Pretreatment with probiotic Enterococcus faecium NCIMB 11181 ameliorates necrotic enteritis-induced intestinal barrier injury in broiler chickens. Sci. Rep. 9:10256–11061.
56. Yaşar, S., Okutan, İ. and Tosun, R. (2017). Testing novel eubiotic additives: its health and performance effects in commercially raised farm animals. Iğdır Univ. J. Inst. Sci. Tech. 7:297–308.
57. Yasmin, S., Nawaz, M. and Anjum, AA. (2019). Antibiotic susceptibility pattern of Salmonellae isolated from poultry from different Districts of Punjab, Pakistan. Pak Vet J 40:98-102.
58. Yazhini, P., Visha, P., Selvaraj, P., Vasanthakumar, P. and Chandran, V. (2018). Dietary encapsulated probiotic effect on broiler serum biochemical parameters. Vet. World. 11:1344–1348.
59. Zhou, C., Liang, J. and Jiang, W. (2020). The effect of a selected yeast fraction on the prevention of pullorum disease and fowl typhoid in commercial breeder chickens. Poult Sci 99(1):101-110.
60. Zhou, X., Kang, X., Zhou, K. (2022). A global dataset for prevalence of Salmonella Gallinarum between 1945 and 2021. Scientific Data 9(1):495-505.
Published
2024-06-19
How to Cite
Kasianenko, O. I., & Shvets, K. (2024). ALTERNATIVE METHODS OF PREVENTION OF INFECTIOUS POULTRY DISEASES. Bulletin of Sumy National Agrarian University. The Series: Veterinary Medicine, (1(64), 3-10. https://doi.org/10.32782/bsnau.vet.2024.1.1
ISSN 
ISSN 
