FORMATION OF THE NUMBER OF PHYTOPATHOGENIC MICROMYCETE POPULATIONS IN AGROCENOSES OF OAT

Keywords: micromycetes, biosafety, vegetative organs of plants, cultivation technologies.

Abstract

The formation of the number of the phytopathogenic micromycete populations as a factor in biological pollution of oat agrocenoses is an important research field, the study of which will make it possible to create some sustainable agroecosystems. Therefore, the influence of the environmental factors (abiotic, biotic, anthropogenic, etc.) on the formation of micromycete populations on the vegetative organs of oat plants using different plant cultivation technologies was studied. This article presents the results of the ecological assessment of oat plant varieties based on the indicators of its their influence on the population number, the frequency of its occurrence, and the intensity of micromycete sporulation. Vegetative organs of oat plants of Parliamentsky and Tembre varieties were selected by BBCH scale for cereals in the phases: 5 tillers detectable (25), node 5 at least 2 cm above node 4 (35), еnd of heading: inflorescence fully emerged (39). It was determined that certain climatic conditions like an abiotic factor (namely an increase in air temperature), frequent droughts, or rare but abundant rains, significantly influenced the formation of micromycete populations in the oat leaf microbiome. Plant growing technologies, as an anthropogenic factor, influenced the spectrum of species and their frequency of the occurrence on the vegetative organs of oats of different kinds of the varieties. Using the organic technology of plant cultivation led to diversification of the spectrum of micromycete populations, but with a lower frequency of occurrence of species compared to the traditional technology of plant cultivation. Also, the varieties of oat plants, as a biotic factor, in terms of some physiological substances of plants, are able to restrain the spread of micromycete populations on the vegetative organs of plants or stimulate them. It was found out that using the traditional and organic technologies of plant cultivation on the vegetative organs of Tembre oat variety, the population density, the frequency of micromycete species occurrence, and the intensity of sporulation were significantly lower compared to the indexes of Parliamentsky oat variety plants. This points to the fact that the cultivation of oat varieties capable of resisting the formation of micromycete populations on an ecologically safe level will ensure a decrease in the level of biological pollution of agrocenoses and at the same time increase the biosafety of plant raw materials.

References

1. Aipova, R., Abdykadyrova, A., Silayev, D., Tazabekova, E., Oshergina, I., Ten, E. & Kurmanbayev, A. (2020). The fabrication of the complex bio-fertilizer for wheat cultivation based on collection bacteria of the PGPR group. Biodiversitas Journal of Biological Diversity, 21(11), 5021–5028. doi: 10.13057/biodiv/d211107.
2. Barratt, B., Moran, V., Bigler, F. & Van Lenteren, J. (2018). The status of biological control and recommendations for improving uptake for the future. BioControl, 63, 155–167. doi: 10.1007/s10526-017-9831-y
3. Beznosko, I., Gorgan, T., Mosiychuk, I., Bunyak, O. & Ternovy, Yu. (2022). Vplyv riznykh tekhnolohiy vyroshchuvannya na chyselnist osnovnykh ekolohotrofichnykh hrup. [The influence of different cultivation technologies on the abundance of the main ecologotrophic groups]. Visnyk Lvivskoho universytetu, 86. 58–72 (in Ukrainian). doi: 10.30970/vlubs.2022.86.05.
4. Beznosko, I., Gorgan, T., Turovnik, Y., Mostovyak. I. & Mudrak, V. (2022). Patohenna mikobiota nasinnya zernovykh kultur pid vplyvom riznykh tekhnolohiy vyroshchuvannya. [Pathogenic mycobiota of cereal seeds under the influence of different cultivation technologies]. Ahroekolohichnyy zhurnal, 1, 110–120 (in Ukrainian). doi: 10.33730/2077-4893.1.2022.255185.
5. Bruinsma, M., Kowalchuk, G. &Veen, J. (2003). Effects of genetically modified plants on microbial communities and processes in soil. Biology and Fertility of Soils, 37(6), 329–337. doi: 10.1007/s00374-003-0613-6.
6. Dermenko, O. (2016). Khvoroby kolosa pshenytsi: diahnostyka, shkidlyvist i zakhody zakhystu. Propozytsiya nova: ukrayinskyy zhurnal z pytan ahrobiznesu: informatsiynyy shchomisyachnyk, 7/8, 96–100. Access mode: http://propozitsiya.com/bolezni-kolosa-pshenicy-diagnostika-opasnost-i-mery-zashchity/2016-96-100.
7. DSTU 7847:2015. Yakist gruntu. Vyznachennya chyselnosti mikroorhanizmiv u grunti metodom posivu na tverde (aharyzovane) zhyvylne seredovyshche. 01.07.2016. Derzhavnyy standart Ukrayiny.
8. Hardoim, P., Van Overbeek, L., Berg, G., Pirttilä, A., Compant, S., Campisano, A., Döring, M. & Sessitsch, A. (2015). The hidden world within plants: Ecological and evolutionary considerations for defining functioning of microbial endophytes. Microb. Mol. Biol., 79(3), 293–320.
9. Kaminska, V. V., Dudka, O. F., & Mushyk, B. V. (2014). Formation of the productivity of bare oats under different growing technologies. A collection of scientific works of the NSC "Institute of Agriculture of the National Academy of Sciences", 4, 60–66 (in Ukrainian).
10. Köhl, J., Kolnaar, R. & Ravensberg, W. (2019). Mode of Action of Microbial Biological Control Agents against Plant Diseases: Relevance Beyond Efficacy. Front. Plant Sci., 10, 845.
11. Lapin, D. & Van den Ackerveken, G. (2013). Susceptibility to plant disease: more than a failure of host immunity. Trends in Plant Science, 18, 546–554.
12. Lamichhane, J. (2017). Pesticide use and risk reduction in European farming systems with IPM: An introduction to the special issue. Crop. Prot., 97, 1–6. doi: 10.1016/j.cropro.2017.01.017
13. Mostovyak, I. I., Demyanyuk, O. S., Parfenyuk, A. I. & Beznosko, I. V. (2020). Sorty yak chynnyk formuvannya stiykykh ahrotsenoziv zernovykh kultur. [Varieties as a factor in the formation of stable agrocenoses of grain crops.] Poltavskoyi derzhavnoyi ahrarnoyi akademiyi, 2, 110–118 (in Ukrainian). doi: 10.31210/visnyk2020.02.13.
14. Ngoune, L. & Shelton, C. (2020). Factors affecting yield of crops. In agronomy–climate change and food security; intech open: London, UK, 32, 137–144. doi: 10.5772/intechopen.90672.
15. Ngoune, L. & Shelton, C. (2020). Factors affecting yield of crops. In agronomy–climate change and food security; intech open: London, UK. 32, 137–144. doi: 10.5772/intechopen.90672
16. O’Brien, P. (2017). Biological control of plant diseases. Australasian Plant Pathology, 46. 293–304. doi: 10.1007/s13313-017-0481-4.
17. Ruytinx, J., Miyauchi, S., Hartmann-Wittulsky, S., Pereira, M., Guinet, F., Churin, J., Put, C., Tacon, F., Veneault-Fourrey, C., Martin, F. & Kohler, A. (2021). A transcriptomic atlas of the ectomycorrhizal fungus Laccaria bicolor. Microorganisms, 9 (12), 2612. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms9122612
18. Sammauria R., Kumawat S., Kumawat P., Singh J., Jatwa T. K. (2020). Microbial inoculants: potential tool for sustainability of agricultural production systems. Archives of microbiology, 202(4), 677–693. doi: 10.1007/s00203-019-01795-w
19. Sessitsch, A., Weilharter, A., Gerzabek, M., Kirchmann, H. & Kandeler, E. (2021). Microbial population structures in soil particle size fractions of a long-term fertilizer field experiment. Applied environmental microbiology, 67(9), 4215–4224. doi: 10.1128/AEM.67.9.4215-4224.2001
20. Shvartau, V., Mykhalska, L. & Zozulya, O. (2017). Poshyrennya fuzariozu v Ukrayini.[ Spread of fusariosis in Ukraine]. Akhronomiya, 4. 40–43 (in Ukrainian).
21. Ternovy, Yu., Havlyuk, V. & Parfenyuk, A. (2018). Ekolohichno bezpechni akhrotekhnolohiyi. [Ecologically safe agricultural technologies]. Ahroekolohichnyy zhurnal, 4. 50–58 (in Ukrainian).
22. Van Montagu, M. (2020). The future of plant biotechnology in a globalized and environmentally endangered world. Genetics and Molecular Biology, 43. doi: 10.1590/1678-4685-GMB-2019-0040
Published
2023-12-27
How to Cite
Beznosko, I., & Havryliuk, L. (2023). FORMATION OF THE NUMBER OF PHYTOPATHOGENIC MICROMYCETE POPULATIONS IN AGROCENOSES OF OAT. Bulletin of Sumy National Agrarian University. The Series: Agronomy and Biology, 54(4), 3-8. https://doi.org/10.32782/agrobio.2023.4.1