THE EFFECT OF CHEMICAL AND BIOLOGICAL PROTECTANTS ON THE SPREAD OF ROOT ROTS CAUSES AND THE YIELD OF SPRING BARLEY
Keywords:
protectants, productivity, spring barley, root rot.
Abstract
Researching the effectiveness of using fungicides against pathogens of grain crops and their impact on plant productivity is an urgent task for modern agricultural production. This article examines such aspects of the use of fungicides as their effect, on effectiveness in combating diseases, and ensuring conditions for the formation of a spring barley crop of the Helios variety. We conducted research using three chemical fungicides with the active substances carbendazim, tebuconazole and azoxystrobin, and biological – based on antagonistic fungi Trichoderma viride (lignorum) and Chaetomium cohliodes in model plants. It was found that in the model vegetation experiment under the conditions of using an artificial infectious background, when treated with the biological fungicide Chaetomiс, the number of healthy plants was 51 %, while in the option without treatment (control) – 5 %. Other fungicides reduced root rot incidence by 12–28 %. The biological fungicide Chaetomiс, which was used as a poisoner, provided the highest efficiency in the fight against root rot pathogens – 56.9 %. Chemical preparations with the active substances carbendazim and tebuconazole restrained the development of the disease by 29.9 and 29.6 %, respectively. Treatment of barley seeds with the biological fungicide Trichodermin provided efficiency at the level of 29.9 %. The fungicide with the active substance azoxystrobin was the least effective in the fight against pathogens, the efficiency of which was 21.6 %. Based on the results of a small-scale field experiment, it was established that the complex treatment with fungicides has an effect on the formation of the spring barley harvest. The use of the fungicide Trichodermin led to a decrease in yield by 0.21 tons per ha compared to the version where the treatment was carried out with water (control). The highest productivity was obtained when using chemical preparations with the active substances carbendazim – 2.74 tons per ha and tebuconazole – 2.41 tons per ha, which is 0.49 and 0.16 tons per ha more than in the control variant.
References
1. Antypova, L.K., Bondarenko, D.I. & Shapovalov, A.I. (2019) Rozvytok i poshyrennia khvorob soi v umovakh Pivdnia Ukrainy [The development and spread of soybean disease in the conditions of Southern Ukraine]. Innovatsiini tekhnolohii v roslynnytstvi: Materialy II Vseukrainskoi naukovoi internet-konferentsii (Kamianets-Podilskyi, 15 travnia 2019). Kamianets-Podilskyi, 9–11 (in Ukrainian).
2. Babulicová, M. & Dyulgerova, В. (2018). Winter barley production in relation to crop rotations, fertilisation and weather. Agriculture (Poľnohospodárstvo). Vol. 64 (1). P. 35–44. doi: 10.2478/agri-2018-0004.
3. Ctankevych, S.V. (2020). Rynok pestytsydiv Ukrainy [Market of pesticides of Ukraine]. Problems and Scientific Solutions: 5th International Scientific and Practical Conference International Forum (in Melbourne, Australia. August 6-8 2020). Australia, P. 104-107. (in Ukrainian).
4. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations URL: https:// www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/QCL
5. Hetman, Y.V. & Naidonova, O.E. (2023). Dynamika chyselnosti mikroorhanizmiv u gruntovii masi chornozemu opidzolenoho pislia obrobky funhitsydamy riznoho pokhodzhennia [Dynamics of the microorganisms’ number in the soil mass of podzolized chernozem after treatment with fungicides of various origins]. AgroChemistry and Soil Science, 95, 47–59. doi:10.31073/acss95-05 (in Ukrainian).
6. Hryhorʼieva, O.M., Dimova, S.B. & Almaieva, T.M. (2019). Efektyvnist biopreparativ u tekhnolohii vyroshchuvannia soi na chornozemi zvychainomu vazhkosuhlynkovomu Pravoberezhnoho stepu Ukrainy [The efficiency of biological preparations In the technology of soybean Growing on heavy loamy Chornozem on the right-bank steppe of ukraine]. Silskohospodarska mikrobiolohiia. 29. P. 46-55 https://doi.org/10.35868/1997-3004.29.46-55 (in Ukrainian).
7. Hrytsiuk, N.V., Derecha, O.A, Bakalova, A.V., Skladanovska, Ya.M. & Popelianska, T.V. (2019). Efektyvnist zastosuvannia preparativ riznoho pokhodzhennia proty fuzarioznoi korenevoi hnyli pshenytsi ozymoi [The effectiveness of complex applying preparations of different origin against fusarium root rot of winter wheat]. Visnyk Poltavskoi derzhavnoi ahrarnoi akademii: Silske hospodarstvo. Roslynnytstvo, 3, 57-64. doi: 10.31210/visnyk2019.03.07 (in Ukrainian).
8. Kononchuk, O.B., Pyda, S.V., Herts, A.I. & Brozak, I.S.(2022). Produktyvnist i urazhennia khvorobamy posiviv ozymoho yachmeniu na chornozemi typovomu zalezhno vid poperednyka y obrobky funhitsydom [Productivity and diseases of winter barley crops on typical type of black soil depending on the preparant and fungicide treatment]. Visnyk Umanskoho natsionalnoho universytetu sadivnytstva: Zakhyst i karantyn roslyn, 1, 133-139 (in Ukrainian).
9. Kosylovych, H.O. & Kokhanets, O.M. (2010). Intehrovanyi zakhyst roslyn [Integrated protection of plants]. navch. posib. Lviv:Lvivskyi natsionalnyi ahrarnyi universytet, 165 (in Ukrainian).
10. Kuzmenko, N.V. & Lukhanin, I.V. (2017). Vplyv khimichnykh protruinykiv na obmezhennia rozvytku korenevykh hnylei yachmeniu yaroho [Effect of chemical disinfectants of seeds on limitation the development of spring barley root rots]. Visnyk Kharkivskoho natsionalnoho ahrarnoho universytetu. Seriia «Fitopatolohiia ta entomolohiia», 1-2б 83-91 (in Ukrainian).
11. Lykhochvor, V.V. & Shcherbachuk, V.M. (2014). Vykorystannia funhitsydiv na soi [The use of fungicides on soybeans]. Vcheni LNAU vyrobnytstvu: kataloh innovatsiinykh rozrobok XIV, 28 (in Ukrainian).
12. Markov, I.L. & Zaremba, V. (2017). Yak shkodiat pshenytsi ozymii khvoroby i de zbehihaiutsia v zymovyi period yikhni zbudnyky [How wheat is affected by winter disease and where its pathogens are stored during the winter]. Propozytsiia. 11, 78 – 82 (in Ukrainian).
13. Miličević, T. (2020). Biofungicidi i mogućnosti njihove primjene u suzbijanju fitopatogenih gljiva i pseudogljiva [Biofungicides and possibilities of their application in the biocontrol of phytopathogenic fungi and pseudofungi]. Glasnik Zastite Bilja, 43, 4, 72. doi: 10.31727/gzb.43.4.9.
14. Mostovʼiak, I.I. & Demʼianiuk, O.S. (2020). Chynnyky destabilizatsii fitosanitarnoho stanu ahrotsenoziv zernovykh kultur Tsentralnoho Lisostepu Ukrainy [Factors of destabilization of the phytosanitary state of agrocenoses of grain crops in the central forest-steppe of ukraine]. Zbalansovane pryrodokorystuvannia. 2. 73-84. doi: 10.33730/2310-4678.2.2020.2088 12 (in Ukrainian).
15. Myhailenko, C.B. & Shevchenko, T.V. (2019). Vplyv suchasnykh funhitsydiv na urazhennia khvorobamy yachmeniu yaroho [Effect of modern fungicides on severity of diseases of spring barley]. Zahyst i kapantyn roslyn. 65. 124–132. doi: 10.36495/1606-9773.2019.65.124- 132 (in Ukrainian).
16. Natsionalnyi Naukovyi Tsentr «Instytut gruntoznavstva i ahrokhimii imeni O.N. Sokolovskoho» (NSC ISSAR) Ukrainskoi Akademii Ahrarnykh Nauk, Pasport polovoho statsionarnoho doslidu, 2005.
17. Omeliuta, V.P., Hryhorovych, Y.V. & Chabanta, V.S. (1986). Oblik shkidnykiv i khvorob silskohospodarskykh kultur [Accounting for pests and diseases of agricultural crops]. Urozhai, K.: 296 (in Ukrainian).
18. Panasiewicz, К., Faligowska, А. Szyma´nska, G. (2020). The effect of various tillage systems on productivity of narrow-leaved lupin-winter wheat-winter triticale-winter barley. Agronomy. 10. 304. doi:10.3390/agronomy10020304.
19. Petit, A.-N., Fontaine, F., Vatsa, P., Clement, C. & Vaillant-Gaveau, N. (2012). Fungicide impacts on photosvnthesis in crop plants. Photosynthesis Research. 111. 315-326. doi:10.1007/s11120-012-9719-8
20. Poliakov, O.I. & Nikitenko, O.V. (2002). Vplyv inkrustatsii nasinnia soniashnyku sortu Prometei na yoho skhozhist ta produktyvnist [The effect of incrustation of Prometheus sunflower seeds on their germination and productivity]. Naukovotekhnichnyi biul. IOK UAAN. 7. 150-153. (in Ukrainian).
21. Pospielova, H.D., Kovalenko, N.P., Nechyporenko, N.I., Kocherha, V.Ia., Hrechkosii, A.O. & Skliar, C.S. (2023). Funhitsydnyi zakhyst posiviv soi vid korenevykh hnylei [Fungicidal protection of soy crops against root rot]. Scientific Progress & Innovations, 26(3), 5–10 (in Ukrainian).
22. Pozniak, S.P. (2016). Chornozemy Ukrainy: heohrafiia, heneza i suchasnyi stan [Chernozems of Ukraine: geography, genesis and current conditions]. Ukrainskyi heohrafichnyi zhurnal, № 1, 9–13. doi: 10.15407/ ugz2016.01.009. (in Ukrainian).
23. Serhiienko, V.H. & Cherhina, O.D. (2011). Vplyv biolohichnykh preparativ na aktyvnist okysno-vidnovnykh fermentiv roslyn tomativ [Effect of biological preparations on the activity of redox enzymes of tomato plants]. Zakhyst i karantyn roslyn. Mizhvid. temat. nauk. zb. 57, 179-188. (in Ukrainian).
24. Sooväli, Р., Koppel, М. & Kangor, Т. (2017). Effectiveness of seed treatment against fusarium spp. and cochliobolus sativus of spring barley in different conditions. Agronomy Research. 15, 1, 280-287.
25. Stepanovic, М., Rekanovic, Е. & Milijasevic-Marcic, S. (2016). Field efficacy of different fungicide mixtures in control of net blotch on barley. Pestic. Phytomed. 31(1–2). 51–57. doi:10.2298/PIF1602051S
26. Suciu, L.A., Sopterean, L., Russu, F. (2021) Effectiveness of fungicides with different modes of action against net blotch disease of two-rowed spring. Bulletin of University of Agricultural Sciences and Veterinary Medicine Cluj-Napoca. Agriculture, 78 (2), 47–58. doi:10.15835/buasvmcn-agr:2021.0011
27. Thapa, G., Dey, M., Sahoo, L. & Panda, S.K. (2011). An insight into the drought stress induced alterations in plants. Biologia Plantarum. 55, 4, 603-613. doi: 10.1007/10535-011-0158-8
28. Trybel, S.O., Babych, A.H. & Babych, O.A. (2011). Metodyky vyprobuvannia pestytsydiv [Methods of testing pesticides]. Natsionalnyi universytet bioresursiv i pryrodokorystuvannia Ukrainy (NULES), Kyiv, 54 (in Ukrainian).
29. Wang, Y. Z., & Miller, J. D. (1988). Screening techniques and sources of resistance to Fusarium head blight. In A. R. Klatt (Ed.), Wheat Production Constraints in Tropical Environments, Mé xico, DF: CIMMYT, 239–250.
30. Woźniak, A. (2020). Effect of various systems of tillage on winter barley yield, weed infestation and soil properties. Applied Ecology And Environmental Research, 18(2), 3483-3496. doi:10.15666/aeer/1802_34833496.
31. Serhiienko, V.H. & Cherhina, O.D. (2011). Vplyv biolohichnykh preparativ na aktyvnist okysno-vidnovnykh fermentiv roslyn tomativ [Effect of biological preparations on the activity of redox enzymes of tomato plants]. Zakhyst i karantyn roslyn. Mizhvid. temat. nauk. zb., 57, 179-188 (in Ukrainian).
32. Zaiarna, O.Iu. (2011). Efektyvnist zastosuvannia biopreparativ i rehuliatoriv rostu roslyn proty korenevykh hnylei yachmeniu yaroho [Effectiveness of biological preparations and plant growth regulators against root rots of spring barley]. Visnyk Poltavskoi derzhavnoi ahrarnoi akademii, 2, 174-177 (in Ukrainian).
33. Zaiets, S.O. & Romanenko, O.L. (2016). Produktyvnist pshenytsi ozymoi zalezhno vid vydiv mineralnykh dobryv ta pidzhyvlennia pry vyroshchuvanni pislia sternovoho poperednyka [The productivity of winter wheat depending on the types of mineral fertilizers and top dressing when grown after the stubble predecessor]. Zroshuvane zemlerobstvo: Melioratsiia, zemlerobstvo, roslynnytstvo, 65, 51–54. (in Ukrainian).
2. Babulicová, M. & Dyulgerova, В. (2018). Winter barley production in relation to crop rotations, fertilisation and weather. Agriculture (Poľnohospodárstvo). Vol. 64 (1). P. 35–44. doi: 10.2478/agri-2018-0004.
3. Ctankevych, S.V. (2020). Rynok pestytsydiv Ukrainy [Market of pesticides of Ukraine]. Problems and Scientific Solutions: 5th International Scientific and Practical Conference International Forum (in Melbourne, Australia. August 6-8 2020). Australia, P. 104-107. (in Ukrainian).
4. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations URL: https:// www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/QCL
5. Hetman, Y.V. & Naidonova, O.E. (2023). Dynamika chyselnosti mikroorhanizmiv u gruntovii masi chornozemu opidzolenoho pislia obrobky funhitsydamy riznoho pokhodzhennia [Dynamics of the microorganisms’ number in the soil mass of podzolized chernozem after treatment with fungicides of various origins]. AgroChemistry and Soil Science, 95, 47–59. doi:10.31073/acss95-05 (in Ukrainian).
6. Hryhorʼieva, O.M., Dimova, S.B. & Almaieva, T.M. (2019). Efektyvnist biopreparativ u tekhnolohii vyroshchuvannia soi na chornozemi zvychainomu vazhkosuhlynkovomu Pravoberezhnoho stepu Ukrainy [The efficiency of biological preparations In the technology of soybean Growing on heavy loamy Chornozem on the right-bank steppe of ukraine]. Silskohospodarska mikrobiolohiia. 29. P. 46-55 https://doi.org/10.35868/1997-3004.29.46-55 (in Ukrainian).
7. Hrytsiuk, N.V., Derecha, O.A, Bakalova, A.V., Skladanovska, Ya.M. & Popelianska, T.V. (2019). Efektyvnist zastosuvannia preparativ riznoho pokhodzhennia proty fuzarioznoi korenevoi hnyli pshenytsi ozymoi [The effectiveness of complex applying preparations of different origin against fusarium root rot of winter wheat]. Visnyk Poltavskoi derzhavnoi ahrarnoi akademii: Silske hospodarstvo. Roslynnytstvo, 3, 57-64. doi: 10.31210/visnyk2019.03.07 (in Ukrainian).
8. Kononchuk, O.B., Pyda, S.V., Herts, A.I. & Brozak, I.S.(2022). Produktyvnist i urazhennia khvorobamy posiviv ozymoho yachmeniu na chornozemi typovomu zalezhno vid poperednyka y obrobky funhitsydom [Productivity and diseases of winter barley crops on typical type of black soil depending on the preparant and fungicide treatment]. Visnyk Umanskoho natsionalnoho universytetu sadivnytstva: Zakhyst i karantyn roslyn, 1, 133-139 (in Ukrainian).
9. Kosylovych, H.O. & Kokhanets, O.M. (2010). Intehrovanyi zakhyst roslyn [Integrated protection of plants]. navch. posib. Lviv:Lvivskyi natsionalnyi ahrarnyi universytet, 165 (in Ukrainian).
10. Kuzmenko, N.V. & Lukhanin, I.V. (2017). Vplyv khimichnykh protruinykiv na obmezhennia rozvytku korenevykh hnylei yachmeniu yaroho [Effect of chemical disinfectants of seeds on limitation the development of spring barley root rots]. Visnyk Kharkivskoho natsionalnoho ahrarnoho universytetu. Seriia «Fitopatolohiia ta entomolohiia», 1-2б 83-91 (in Ukrainian).
11. Lykhochvor, V.V. & Shcherbachuk, V.M. (2014). Vykorystannia funhitsydiv na soi [The use of fungicides on soybeans]. Vcheni LNAU vyrobnytstvu: kataloh innovatsiinykh rozrobok XIV, 28 (in Ukrainian).
12. Markov, I.L. & Zaremba, V. (2017). Yak shkodiat pshenytsi ozymii khvoroby i de zbehihaiutsia v zymovyi period yikhni zbudnyky [How wheat is affected by winter disease and where its pathogens are stored during the winter]. Propozytsiia. 11, 78 – 82 (in Ukrainian).
13. Miličević, T. (2020). Biofungicidi i mogućnosti njihove primjene u suzbijanju fitopatogenih gljiva i pseudogljiva [Biofungicides and possibilities of their application in the biocontrol of phytopathogenic fungi and pseudofungi]. Glasnik Zastite Bilja, 43, 4, 72. doi: 10.31727/gzb.43.4.9.
14. Mostovʼiak, I.I. & Demʼianiuk, O.S. (2020). Chynnyky destabilizatsii fitosanitarnoho stanu ahrotsenoziv zernovykh kultur Tsentralnoho Lisostepu Ukrainy [Factors of destabilization of the phytosanitary state of agrocenoses of grain crops in the central forest-steppe of ukraine]. Zbalansovane pryrodokorystuvannia. 2. 73-84. doi: 10.33730/2310-4678.2.2020.2088 12 (in Ukrainian).
15. Myhailenko, C.B. & Shevchenko, T.V. (2019). Vplyv suchasnykh funhitsydiv na urazhennia khvorobamy yachmeniu yaroho [Effect of modern fungicides on severity of diseases of spring barley]. Zahyst i kapantyn roslyn. 65. 124–132. doi: 10.36495/1606-9773.2019.65.124- 132 (in Ukrainian).
16. Natsionalnyi Naukovyi Tsentr «Instytut gruntoznavstva i ahrokhimii imeni O.N. Sokolovskoho» (NSC ISSAR) Ukrainskoi Akademii Ahrarnykh Nauk, Pasport polovoho statsionarnoho doslidu, 2005.
17. Omeliuta, V.P., Hryhorovych, Y.V. & Chabanta, V.S. (1986). Oblik shkidnykiv i khvorob silskohospodarskykh kultur [Accounting for pests and diseases of agricultural crops]. Urozhai, K.: 296 (in Ukrainian).
18. Panasiewicz, К., Faligowska, А. Szyma´nska, G. (2020). The effect of various tillage systems on productivity of narrow-leaved lupin-winter wheat-winter triticale-winter barley. Agronomy. 10. 304. doi:10.3390/agronomy10020304.
19. Petit, A.-N., Fontaine, F., Vatsa, P., Clement, C. & Vaillant-Gaveau, N. (2012). Fungicide impacts on photosvnthesis in crop plants. Photosynthesis Research. 111. 315-326. doi:10.1007/s11120-012-9719-8
20. Poliakov, O.I. & Nikitenko, O.V. (2002). Vplyv inkrustatsii nasinnia soniashnyku sortu Prometei na yoho skhozhist ta produktyvnist [The effect of incrustation of Prometheus sunflower seeds on their germination and productivity]. Naukovotekhnichnyi biul. IOK UAAN. 7. 150-153. (in Ukrainian).
21. Pospielova, H.D., Kovalenko, N.P., Nechyporenko, N.I., Kocherha, V.Ia., Hrechkosii, A.O. & Skliar, C.S. (2023). Funhitsydnyi zakhyst posiviv soi vid korenevykh hnylei [Fungicidal protection of soy crops against root rot]. Scientific Progress & Innovations, 26(3), 5–10 (in Ukrainian).
22. Pozniak, S.P. (2016). Chornozemy Ukrainy: heohrafiia, heneza i suchasnyi stan [Chernozems of Ukraine: geography, genesis and current conditions]. Ukrainskyi heohrafichnyi zhurnal, № 1, 9–13. doi: 10.15407/ ugz2016.01.009. (in Ukrainian).
23. Serhiienko, V.H. & Cherhina, O.D. (2011). Vplyv biolohichnykh preparativ na aktyvnist okysno-vidnovnykh fermentiv roslyn tomativ [Effect of biological preparations on the activity of redox enzymes of tomato plants]. Zakhyst i karantyn roslyn. Mizhvid. temat. nauk. zb. 57, 179-188. (in Ukrainian).
24. Sooväli, Р., Koppel, М. & Kangor, Т. (2017). Effectiveness of seed treatment against fusarium spp. and cochliobolus sativus of spring barley in different conditions. Agronomy Research. 15, 1, 280-287.
25. Stepanovic, М., Rekanovic, Е. & Milijasevic-Marcic, S. (2016). Field efficacy of different fungicide mixtures in control of net blotch on barley. Pestic. Phytomed. 31(1–2). 51–57. doi:10.2298/PIF1602051S
26. Suciu, L.A., Sopterean, L., Russu, F. (2021) Effectiveness of fungicides with different modes of action against net blotch disease of two-rowed spring. Bulletin of University of Agricultural Sciences and Veterinary Medicine Cluj-Napoca. Agriculture, 78 (2), 47–58. doi:10.15835/buasvmcn-agr:2021.0011
27. Thapa, G., Dey, M., Sahoo, L. & Panda, S.K. (2011). An insight into the drought stress induced alterations in plants. Biologia Plantarum. 55, 4, 603-613. doi: 10.1007/10535-011-0158-8
28. Trybel, S.O., Babych, A.H. & Babych, O.A. (2011). Metodyky vyprobuvannia pestytsydiv [Methods of testing pesticides]. Natsionalnyi universytet bioresursiv i pryrodokorystuvannia Ukrainy (NULES), Kyiv, 54 (in Ukrainian).
29. Wang, Y. Z., & Miller, J. D. (1988). Screening techniques and sources of resistance to Fusarium head blight. In A. R. Klatt (Ed.), Wheat Production Constraints in Tropical Environments, Mé xico, DF: CIMMYT, 239–250.
30. Woźniak, A. (2020). Effect of various systems of tillage on winter barley yield, weed infestation and soil properties. Applied Ecology And Environmental Research, 18(2), 3483-3496. doi:10.15666/aeer/1802_34833496.
31. Serhiienko, V.H. & Cherhina, O.D. (2011). Vplyv biolohichnykh preparativ na aktyvnist okysno-vidnovnykh fermentiv roslyn tomativ [Effect of biological preparations on the activity of redox enzymes of tomato plants]. Zakhyst i karantyn roslyn. Mizhvid. temat. nauk. zb., 57, 179-188 (in Ukrainian).
32. Zaiarna, O.Iu. (2011). Efektyvnist zastosuvannia biopreparativ i rehuliatoriv rostu roslyn proty korenevykh hnylei yachmeniu yaroho [Effectiveness of biological preparations and plant growth regulators against root rots of spring barley]. Visnyk Poltavskoi derzhavnoi ahrarnoi akademii, 2, 174-177 (in Ukrainian).
33. Zaiets, S.O. & Romanenko, O.L. (2016). Produktyvnist pshenytsi ozymoi zalezhno vid vydiv mineralnykh dobryv ta pidzhyvlennia pry vyroshchuvanni pislia sternovoho poperednyka [The productivity of winter wheat depending on the types of mineral fertilizers and top dressing when grown after the stubble predecessor]. Zroshuvane zemlerobstvo: Melioratsiia, zemlerobstvo, roslynnytstvo, 65, 51–54. (in Ukrainian).
Published
2024-06-16
How to Cite
Hetman, Y. V. (2024). THE EFFECT OF CHEMICAL AND BIOLOGICAL PROTECTANTS ON THE SPREAD OF ROOT ROTS CAUSES AND THE YIELD OF SPRING BARLEY. Bulletin of Sumy National Agrarian University. The Series: Agronomy and Biology, 55(1), 56-62. https://doi.org/10.32782/agrobio.2024.1.8
ISSN 
ISSN 
