USE OF AGRICULTURAL TECHNOLOGIES TO PRESERVE SOIL RESOURCES AND IMPROVE SOIL QUALITY
Keywords:
soil resources, agricultural technologies, conservation methods of soil treatment, cover crops, organic and mineral fertilizers, vermicomposting
Abstract
The article examines the main causes of soil degradation, including erosion, depletion and pollution. It was determined that soil depletion occurs as a result of intensive use of land without proper restoration of its fertility. Continuous cultivation of monocultures, excessive use of chemical fertilizers and pesticides lead to a decrease in the content of organic substances in the soil, deterioration of its structure and a decrease in the ability to retain moisture, which makes the soil less productive and vulnerable to erosion. It is highlighted that soil pollution is the result of anthropogenic activities, such as industrial production, improper storage of waste, excessive use of chemicals and pesticides. Soil degradation leads to a decrease in its fertility, which, in turn, affects the yield of agricultural crops. Plants do not receive enough nutrients, which leads to their weak growth and development. In addition, degraded soils are less able to retain moisture, which is especially critical in conditions of climate change and frequent droughts. This forces farmers to spend more on irrigation, fertilizers and pesticides, which increases the cost of production and reduces the economic efficiency of agriculture. The article substantiates a number of leading technologies for preserving soil resources and improving soil quality. Conservation tillage methods, including minimum and zero tillage, have become an important part of modern agriculture. Minimal tillage involves reducing the amount of soil tillage, which reduces the mechanical impact on it, helps to preserve plant residues, increase the content of organic substances and conserve moisture. Zero tillage involves the complete rejection of mechanical tillage, which allows preserving the natural structure of the soil, improving its water and air permeability, increasing the number of beneficial microorganisms and reducing greenhouse gas emissions. The article also discusses the implementation of crop rotation and cover crops as effective methods of preserving soil resources and improving soil quality. Crop rotation helps improve soil structure, reduce the risk of erosion, control pests and diseases, and ensure a balanced use of nutrients. Cover crops create a protective layer on the surface of the soil, improve its structure, enrich the soil with organic substances and help retain moisture. The implementation of these technologies allows to ensure the sustainable development of agriculture, increase the efficiency of the agricultural sector and reduce the negative impact on the environment.
References
1. Adam, D. H., Supriadi, Y. N., & Ende Siregar, Z. M. E. (2020). Green Manufacturing, Green Chemistry And Environmental Sustainability: A Review. International Journal of Scientific & Technology Research, 9(04), 2209–2211.
2. Andryeyeva, N., Khumarova, N., & Nikolaychuk, T. (2019). Aligning the social, environmental, and economic interests of “green growth” of the Ukrainian nature reserve fund objects. Environmental Economics, 10(1), 93–104. doi:10.21511/ee.10(1).2019.07
3. Amons, S. E. (2021). Stan ta perspektyvy rozvytku vyrobnyctva orghanichnoji produkciji v Ukrajini [State and prospects for the development of organic production in Ukraine]. Siljsjke ghospodarstvo ta lisivnyctvo – Agriculture and forestry, 3 (22), 221236 (in Ukrainian).
4. Amons, S., & Krasnyak, O. (2023). Ecologization of agricultural production as the basis of the formation of the food security system of Ukraine. Economy and Society, 47 (in Ukrainian). doi: 10.32782/2524-0072/2023-47-41
5. Bacco, M., Barsocchi, P., Ferro, E., Gotta, A., & Ruggeri, M. (2019). The Digitisation of Agriculture: A Survey of Research Activities on Smart Farming. Array, 3–4. Access mode: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/.
6. Bahorka, M. O., & Serhiyenko, A. A. (2021). Ekolohizatsiya vyrobnytstva ahrarnykh pidpryyemstv yak innovatsiyna skladova yikh rozvytku. [Greening of the production of agricultural enterprises as an innovative component of their development]. Ekonomichni studiyi, 3(33), 10–16. (in Ukrainian).
7. Bilinska, V. (2015). Modern innovative technologies in agriculture: the main characteristics and prospects of implementation. Bulletin of Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv Economics, 7, 74–80. doi: 10.17721/1728-2667.2015/172-7/11.
8. Bhunia, G. S., Shit, P. K., & Sengupta, D. (2021). Free-open access geospatial data and tools for forest resources management. In: Spatial modeling in forest resources management: rural livelihood and sustainable development (651–675). Springer, Cham.
9. Borodina, O. (2022). Bazovi trendy povoyennoyi transformatsiyi ekonomiky Ukrayiny: byudzhetna detsentralizatsiya, industriya 4.0, rehionalʹnyy enerhomenedzhment [Basic trends of postwar transformation of Ukraine’s economy: industry 4.0, budgetary decentralization, regional energy management]. Journal of Innovations and Sustainability, 6(1) doi: 10.51599/is.2022.06.01.04 (in Ukrainian).
10. Carolan, M. (2020). Automated agrifood futures: robotics, labor and the distributive politics of digital agriculture. Journal of Peasant Studies, 47, 184–207, doi: 10.1080/03066150.2019.1584189
11. Chabaniuk, V., & Polyvach, K. (2020). Critical properties of modern geographic information systems for territory management. Cybernetics and Computer Engineering, 3(201), 5–32. doi:10.15407/kvt201.03.005
12. Dankevich, V. E., & Dankevich, E. M. (2019). Monitoring of agricultural lands using remote land sensing systems. Economy of agro-industrial complex, 8, 27.
13. Danko, Y., & Nifatova, O. (2022). Agro-sphere determinants of green branding: eco-consumption, loyalty, and price premium. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 9(1), 1–9.
14. de Marco, B. A., Rechelo, B. S, Tótoli, E. G., Kogawa, A. C., & Salgado, H. R. N. (2019). Evolution of green chemistry and its multi dimensional impacts: A review. The Saudi Pharmaceutical Journal, 27(1), 1–8. doi: 10.1016/j.jsps.2018.07.011
15. FiBL & IFOAM – Organics International. The World of Organic Agriculture. Statistics & emerging trends (2022). Access mode: https://www.fibl.org/fileadmin/documents/shop/1344-organic-world-2022.pdf
16. Furdychko, O. I. (Ed.). (2022). Ekoloho-ekonomichni zasady zbalansovanoho ahrarnoho vyrobnytstva ta vykorystannya pryrodnykh resursiv ahrosfery: monohrafiya [Ecological and economic principles of balanced agricultural production and use of natural resources of the agrosphere: monograph]. DIA, Kyiv (in Ukrainian)
17. Hablovskyi, B., Hablovska, N., Shtohryn, L., Kasiyanchuk, D., & Kononenko, M. (2023). The Long-Term Prediction of Landslide Processes within the Precarpathian Depression of the Cernivtsi Region of Ukraine. Journal of Ecological Engineering, 24(7), 254–262. doi: 10.12911/22998993/164753
18. Hunko, L. (2022). Formuvannya staloho (zbalansovanoho) zemlekorystuvannya – bazova osnova rozvytku ekonomiky zemlevporyadkuvannya v Ukrayini [Formation of sustainable (balanced) land use – basis of economic development of land planning in Ukraine], Agrosvit, 9–10, 51–61 (in Ukrainian). doi: 10.32702/2306-6792.2022.9-10.51
19. Kalina, I. (2019). Conceptual principles of construction of digitalization of agricultural sector. Efektyvna ekonomika, [Online], 10. Access mode: http://www.economy.nayka.com.ua/?op=1&z=8232. doi: 10.32702/2307-2105-2019.10.82.
20. Khan, K. Y., Ali, B., Stoffella, P. J., Feng, Y., Cui, X., Guo, Y. & Yang, X., (2020). Bioavailability and bioaccessibility of Cd in low and high Cd uptake affinity cultivais of Brassica rapa ssp. Chinensis L. (Pakchoi) using an In vitro gastrointestinal and physiologically-based extraction test. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis, 51(1), 28-37.
21. Kharchenko, T. O., & Hasyuk, R. Y. (2022). Otsinka rezulʹtatyvnosti stratehichnoho planuvannya yak skladovoyi orhanizatsiynoho mekhanizmu derzhavnoho rehulyuvannya rozvytku terytorialʹnykh hromad [Evaluation of the effectiveness of strategic planning as a component of the organizational mechanism of state regulation of the development of territorial communities]. Dniprovsʹkyy naukovyy chasopys publichnoho upravlinnya, psykholohiyi, prava, 4, 67–72 (in Ukrainian). doi: 10.51547/ppp.dp.ua/2022.4.9
22. Khvesyk, M. A., & Holyan, V. K. (2006). Instytutsionalʹne zabezpechennya zemlekorystuvannya: teoriya i praktyka: monohrafiya, [Institutional provision of land use: theory and practice: monograph] NAN Ukrayiny (in Ukrainian).
23. Kosarev, M. V., & Yasenev, S. O. (2014). Kosmichni znimky yak fundamentalʹna osnova kartohrafichnykh materialiv ta heoinformatsiynykh system [Space images as a fundamental basis of cartographic materials and geoinformation systems]. Problems of continuous geographical education and cartography. Collection of scientific works, 19, 42–45 (in Ukrainian).
24. Krishna, N. Ganesh, Deqing, Zhang, Scott, J. Miller, Kai, Rossen, Paul J. Chirik, Marisa C. Kozlowski, Julie, B. Zimmerman, Bryan, W. Brooks, Phillip, E. Savage, David, T. Allen, & Adelina, M. Voutchkova-Kostal. (2021). Green Chemistry: A Framework for a Sustainable Future Environmental. Science & Technology, 55(13), 8459–8463. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.1c03762
25. Lupenko, Yu. O. & Malik, M. Y. (2020). Strategichni napryamy stalogo rozvytku silskih teritoriy na period do 2030 roku [Strategic directions of sustainable development of rural areas for the period up to 2030], NNC, IAE. Ukraine (in Ukrainian).
26. Makedon, V.V., & Bailova, O.O. (2023). Planuvannya i orhanizatsiya vprovadzhennya tsyfrovykh tekhnolohiy v diyalʹnistʹ promyslovykh pidpryyemstv. [Planning and organizing the implementation of digital technologies in the activities of industrial enterprises]. Naukovyy visnyk Khersonsʹkoho derzhavnoho universytetu. Seriya «Ekonomichni nauky» [Scientific Bulletin of Kherson State University. Series "Economic Sciences"], 47, 16–26 (in Ukrainian). doi: 10.32999/ksu2307-8030/2023-47-3.
27. Makedon, V. V., & Chabanenko, A. V. (2022). Faktorni skladovi tsyfrovizatsiyi hlobalʹnoyi ekonomiky ta makroekonomichnykh system krayin svitu [Factor components of digitalization of the global economy and macroeconomic systems of the countries of the world.]. Efektyvna ekonomika, 1. (in Ukrainian). Access mode: http://www.economy.nayka.om.ua/?op=1&z=9875 doi: 10.32702/2307-2105-2022.1.11.
28. Makedon, V., Dzeveluk, A., Khaustova, Y., Bieliakova, O., & Nazarenko, I. (2021). Enterprise multi-level energy efficiency management system development. International Journal of Energy, Environment, and Economics, 29(1), 73–91.
29. Makedon, V. and Ilchenko, N. (2021). Konʺyunktura svitovoho rynku IT-posluh v umovakh Ekonomiky 4.0 [World market of it services in the languages of economy 4.0]. Efektyvna ekonomika, [Online], 1, Access mode: http://www.economy.nayka.com.ua/?op=1&z=8525. doi: 10.32702/2307-2105-2021.1.8. (in Ukrainian).
30. Makedon, V. V., Valikov, V. P., & Fedyora, S. S. (2019). Udoskonalennya upravlinnya promyslovymy pidpryyemstvamy na osnovi stratehiy innovatsiynoho rozvytku [Improving the management of industrial enterprises based on innovative development strategies]. Yevropeysʹkyy vektor ekonomichnoho rozvytku [European vector of economic development], 1, 108–125 (in Ukrainian).
31. Nebrat, V. V. (2023). Vidbudova dlya rozvytku: zarubizhnyy dosvid ta ukrayinsʹki perspektyvy: mizhnarodna kolektyvna monohrafiya [Reconstruction for development: foreign experience and Ukrainian perspectives: an international collective monograph]. National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, Electron, Kyiv (in Ukrainian).
32. Orghanichna platforma znanj (2023). Biodynamichne siljsjke ghospodarstvo v Ukrajini. Oghljad rozvytku ta potochnoji sytuaciji [Biodynamic agriculture in Ukraine. Overview of development and current situation]. Access mode: https://organic-platform.org/top_news/biodynamichne-silske-gospodarstvo-v-ukrayini-oglyad-rozvytku-ta-potochnoyisytuacziyi/(in Ukrainian).
33. Orsini, S., Padel, S., & Lampkin, N. Labour. (2018). Use on Organic Farms: a Review of Research since 2000. Organic Farming, 4(1), 7–15. doi: 10.12924/of2018.04010007.
34. Ozdogan, B., Gacar, A., & Aktas, H. (2017). Digital Agriculture Practices in the Context of Agriculture 4.0. Journal of Economics, Finance and Accounting, 4(2), 184–191. doi: 10.17261/Pressacademia.2017.448.
35. Pylypiv, N. I., Pyatnychuk, I. D., & Sologub, S. I. (2021). Rolʹ stratehiyi sotsialʹno-ekonomichnoho rozvytku OTH v konteksti zminy pidkhodiv do rehionalʹnoho rozvytku v Ukrayini [The role of the strategy of socio-economic development of OTG in the context of changing approaches to regional development in Ukraine]. Herald. Mykolayiv National Agrarian University. Access mode: dspace.mnau.edu.ua/jspui/bitstream/123456789/10259/1/53-55.pdf. (in Ukrainian).
36. Qin, T., Wang, L., Zhou, Y., Guo, L., Jiang, G., & Zhang, L. (2022). Digital Technology-and-Services-Driven Sustainable Transformation of Agriculture: Cases of China and the EU. Agriculture, 12, 297. doi: 10.3390/agriculture12020297.
37. Reznichenko, V.P., Kovalʹov, M.M. & Kulyk, H.A. (2019). Obgruntuvannya zamknenoho resursozberihayuchoho vyrobnytstva ekolohichno bezpechnoyi silʹsʹkohospodarsʹkoyi produktsiyi u suchasnykh enerhonezalezhnykh ahroekokompleksakh [Justification of closed resource-saving production of ecologically safe agricultural products in modern energy-independent agro-ecocomplexes]. Tavriysʹkyy naukovyy visnyk [Taurian Scientific Herald], 109 (1), 109–114 doi: 10.32851/2226-0099.2019.109-1.17 (in Ukrainian).
38. Semenyuk, I., Ivanchenko, H., & Veslova, YA. (2023). Stratehichnyy rozvytok hromad v umovakh podolannya voyennykh vyklykiv: proyektnyy pidkhid [Strategic development of communities in the conditions of overcoming military challenges: a project approach]. Ekonomika ta suspilʹstvo, (55). https://doi.org/10.32782/2524-0072/2023-55-5 (in Ukrainian).
39. Takahashi, K., Preetz, H., & Igel, J., (2011). Soil properties and performance of landmine detection by metal detector and ground-penetrating radar – soil characterisation and its verification by a field test. The Journal of Applied Geophysics, 73, 368–377.
40. Tretіak, A. Tretіak, V. Kuriltsiv, R. Priadka, T. & Tretіak, N. (2021). Upravlinnia zemel'nymy resursamy ta zemlekorystuvanniam: bazovi zasady teorii, instytutsiolizatsii, praktyky [Management of land resources and land use: basic principles of theory, institutionalization, practice], Belotserkivdruk LL, Bila Tserkva, Ukraine (in Ukrainian).
41. Santi, M., Sancineto, L., Nascimento, V., Azeredo, J. B., Orozco, E. V. M., Andrade, L. H., Gröger, H., & Santi, C. (2021). Flow Biocatalysis: A Challenging Alternative for the Synthesis of APIs and Natural Compounds. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 22(3), 990. doi: 10.3390/ijms22030990, PMid:33498198 PMCid:PMC7863935.
42. Sitkovska, A. O., & Masliaieva, O. O. (2023). Zemelʹno-resursnyy potentsial ahrarnoho sektoru: stan ta osoblyvosti vykorystannya [Land and resource potential of the agricultural sector: state and features of use]. Agrosvit, 9–10, 77–81 (in Ukrainian).
43. Scholtens, B. (2017). Why Finance Should Care about Ecology. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 32. doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2017.03.013/
44. Vasylenko, I. A., Chuprinov, E. V., Ivanchenko, A. V., Skyba, M. I., Vorobyova, V. I., & Galish, V. V. (2019). Zeleni tekhnolohiyi u promyslovosti: Monohrafiya [Green technologies in industry]. Dnipro (in Ukrainian).
45. Villanueva, J. K. S., & Blanco, A. C. (2019). Optimization of ground control point (GCP) configuration for unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) survey using structure from motion (SFM). The International Archives of Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, 42, 167–174. doi:10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-4-W12-167-2019.
46. Wang, C., & Dong, G. (2019). Research on Green Financial Ecology Construction Based on Low Carbon Economy. Ekoloji, 107, 3635–3641 URL: http://www.ekolojidergisi.com/article/research-on-green-financial-ecology-constructionbased-on-low-carbon-economy-6006.
47. Woo, K. S., & Worboys, G. (2019). Geological monitoring in protected areas, International Journal of Geoheritage and Parks, 7(4), 218–225. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgeop.2019.12.004.
48. Yamelynets, T. (2022). Informatsiyne gruntoznavstvo: monohrafiya [Informational soil science: monograph]. LNU named after Ivan Franko, Lviv (in Ukrainian).
49. Zhang, X., Yao, G., Vishwakarma, S., Musumba, M., Heyman, A. & Eric A., Davidson (2021). Quantitative assessment of agricultural sustainability reveals divergent priorities among nations. One Earthe, 4, 1262–1277.
50. Zghurska, O., Korchynska, O., Rubel, K., Kubiv, S., Tarasiuk, A., & Holovchenko, O. (2022). Digitalization of the national agro-industrial complex: new challenges, realities and prospects. Financial and Credit Activity Problems of Theory and Practice, 6(47), 388–399. doi: 10.55643/fcaptp.6.47.2022.3929.
2. Andryeyeva, N., Khumarova, N., & Nikolaychuk, T. (2019). Aligning the social, environmental, and economic interests of “green growth” of the Ukrainian nature reserve fund objects. Environmental Economics, 10(1), 93–104. doi:10.21511/ee.10(1).2019.07
3. Amons, S. E. (2021). Stan ta perspektyvy rozvytku vyrobnyctva orghanichnoji produkciji v Ukrajini [State and prospects for the development of organic production in Ukraine]. Siljsjke ghospodarstvo ta lisivnyctvo – Agriculture and forestry, 3 (22), 221236 (in Ukrainian).
4. Amons, S., & Krasnyak, O. (2023). Ecologization of agricultural production as the basis of the formation of the food security system of Ukraine. Economy and Society, 47 (in Ukrainian). doi: 10.32782/2524-0072/2023-47-41
5. Bacco, M., Barsocchi, P., Ferro, E., Gotta, A., & Ruggeri, M. (2019). The Digitisation of Agriculture: A Survey of Research Activities on Smart Farming. Array, 3–4. Access mode: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/.
6. Bahorka, M. O., & Serhiyenko, A. A. (2021). Ekolohizatsiya vyrobnytstva ahrarnykh pidpryyemstv yak innovatsiyna skladova yikh rozvytku. [Greening of the production of agricultural enterprises as an innovative component of their development]. Ekonomichni studiyi, 3(33), 10–16. (in Ukrainian).
7. Bilinska, V. (2015). Modern innovative technologies in agriculture: the main characteristics and prospects of implementation. Bulletin of Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv Economics, 7, 74–80. doi: 10.17721/1728-2667.2015/172-7/11.
8. Bhunia, G. S., Shit, P. K., & Sengupta, D. (2021). Free-open access geospatial data and tools for forest resources management. In: Spatial modeling in forest resources management: rural livelihood and sustainable development (651–675). Springer, Cham.
9. Borodina, O. (2022). Bazovi trendy povoyennoyi transformatsiyi ekonomiky Ukrayiny: byudzhetna detsentralizatsiya, industriya 4.0, rehionalʹnyy enerhomenedzhment [Basic trends of postwar transformation of Ukraine’s economy: industry 4.0, budgetary decentralization, regional energy management]. Journal of Innovations and Sustainability, 6(1) doi: 10.51599/is.2022.06.01.04 (in Ukrainian).
10. Carolan, M. (2020). Automated agrifood futures: robotics, labor and the distributive politics of digital agriculture. Journal of Peasant Studies, 47, 184–207, doi: 10.1080/03066150.2019.1584189
11. Chabaniuk, V., & Polyvach, K. (2020). Critical properties of modern geographic information systems for territory management. Cybernetics and Computer Engineering, 3(201), 5–32. doi:10.15407/kvt201.03.005
12. Dankevich, V. E., & Dankevich, E. M. (2019). Monitoring of agricultural lands using remote land sensing systems. Economy of agro-industrial complex, 8, 27.
13. Danko, Y., & Nifatova, O. (2022). Agro-sphere determinants of green branding: eco-consumption, loyalty, and price premium. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 9(1), 1–9.
14. de Marco, B. A., Rechelo, B. S, Tótoli, E. G., Kogawa, A. C., & Salgado, H. R. N. (2019). Evolution of green chemistry and its multi dimensional impacts: A review. The Saudi Pharmaceutical Journal, 27(1), 1–8. doi: 10.1016/j.jsps.2018.07.011
15. FiBL & IFOAM – Organics International. The World of Organic Agriculture. Statistics & emerging trends (2022). Access mode: https://www.fibl.org/fileadmin/documents/shop/1344-organic-world-2022.pdf
16. Furdychko, O. I. (Ed.). (2022). Ekoloho-ekonomichni zasady zbalansovanoho ahrarnoho vyrobnytstva ta vykorystannya pryrodnykh resursiv ahrosfery: monohrafiya [Ecological and economic principles of balanced agricultural production and use of natural resources of the agrosphere: monograph]. DIA, Kyiv (in Ukrainian)
17. Hablovskyi, B., Hablovska, N., Shtohryn, L., Kasiyanchuk, D., & Kononenko, M. (2023). The Long-Term Prediction of Landslide Processes within the Precarpathian Depression of the Cernivtsi Region of Ukraine. Journal of Ecological Engineering, 24(7), 254–262. doi: 10.12911/22998993/164753
18. Hunko, L. (2022). Formuvannya staloho (zbalansovanoho) zemlekorystuvannya – bazova osnova rozvytku ekonomiky zemlevporyadkuvannya v Ukrayini [Formation of sustainable (balanced) land use – basis of economic development of land planning in Ukraine], Agrosvit, 9–10, 51–61 (in Ukrainian). doi: 10.32702/2306-6792.2022.9-10.51
19. Kalina, I. (2019). Conceptual principles of construction of digitalization of agricultural sector. Efektyvna ekonomika, [Online], 10. Access mode: http://www.economy.nayka.com.ua/?op=1&z=8232. doi: 10.32702/2307-2105-2019.10.82.
20. Khan, K. Y., Ali, B., Stoffella, P. J., Feng, Y., Cui, X., Guo, Y. & Yang, X., (2020). Bioavailability and bioaccessibility of Cd in low and high Cd uptake affinity cultivais of Brassica rapa ssp. Chinensis L. (Pakchoi) using an In vitro gastrointestinal and physiologically-based extraction test. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis, 51(1), 28-37.
21. Kharchenko, T. O., & Hasyuk, R. Y. (2022). Otsinka rezulʹtatyvnosti stratehichnoho planuvannya yak skladovoyi orhanizatsiynoho mekhanizmu derzhavnoho rehulyuvannya rozvytku terytorialʹnykh hromad [Evaluation of the effectiveness of strategic planning as a component of the organizational mechanism of state regulation of the development of territorial communities]. Dniprovsʹkyy naukovyy chasopys publichnoho upravlinnya, psykholohiyi, prava, 4, 67–72 (in Ukrainian). doi: 10.51547/ppp.dp.ua/2022.4.9
22. Khvesyk, M. A., & Holyan, V. K. (2006). Instytutsionalʹne zabezpechennya zemlekorystuvannya: teoriya i praktyka: monohrafiya, [Institutional provision of land use: theory and practice: monograph] NAN Ukrayiny (in Ukrainian).
23. Kosarev, M. V., & Yasenev, S. O. (2014). Kosmichni znimky yak fundamentalʹna osnova kartohrafichnykh materialiv ta heoinformatsiynykh system [Space images as a fundamental basis of cartographic materials and geoinformation systems]. Problems of continuous geographical education and cartography. Collection of scientific works, 19, 42–45 (in Ukrainian).
24. Krishna, N. Ganesh, Deqing, Zhang, Scott, J. Miller, Kai, Rossen, Paul J. Chirik, Marisa C. Kozlowski, Julie, B. Zimmerman, Bryan, W. Brooks, Phillip, E. Savage, David, T. Allen, & Adelina, M. Voutchkova-Kostal. (2021). Green Chemistry: A Framework for a Sustainable Future Environmental. Science & Technology, 55(13), 8459–8463. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.1c03762
25. Lupenko, Yu. O. & Malik, M. Y. (2020). Strategichni napryamy stalogo rozvytku silskih teritoriy na period do 2030 roku [Strategic directions of sustainable development of rural areas for the period up to 2030], NNC, IAE. Ukraine (in Ukrainian).
26. Makedon, V.V., & Bailova, O.O. (2023). Planuvannya i orhanizatsiya vprovadzhennya tsyfrovykh tekhnolohiy v diyalʹnistʹ promyslovykh pidpryyemstv. [Planning and organizing the implementation of digital technologies in the activities of industrial enterprises]. Naukovyy visnyk Khersonsʹkoho derzhavnoho universytetu. Seriya «Ekonomichni nauky» [Scientific Bulletin of Kherson State University. Series "Economic Sciences"], 47, 16–26 (in Ukrainian). doi: 10.32999/ksu2307-8030/2023-47-3.
27. Makedon, V. V., & Chabanenko, A. V. (2022). Faktorni skladovi tsyfrovizatsiyi hlobalʹnoyi ekonomiky ta makroekonomichnykh system krayin svitu [Factor components of digitalization of the global economy and macroeconomic systems of the countries of the world.]. Efektyvna ekonomika, 1. (in Ukrainian). Access mode: http://www.economy.nayka.om.ua/?op=1&z=9875 doi: 10.32702/2307-2105-2022.1.11.
28. Makedon, V., Dzeveluk, A., Khaustova, Y., Bieliakova, O., & Nazarenko, I. (2021). Enterprise multi-level energy efficiency management system development. International Journal of Energy, Environment, and Economics, 29(1), 73–91.
29. Makedon, V. and Ilchenko, N. (2021). Konʺyunktura svitovoho rynku IT-posluh v umovakh Ekonomiky 4.0 [World market of it services in the languages of economy 4.0]. Efektyvna ekonomika, [Online], 1, Access mode: http://www.economy.nayka.com.ua/?op=1&z=8525. doi: 10.32702/2307-2105-2021.1.8. (in Ukrainian).
30. Makedon, V. V., Valikov, V. P., & Fedyora, S. S. (2019). Udoskonalennya upravlinnya promyslovymy pidpryyemstvamy na osnovi stratehiy innovatsiynoho rozvytku [Improving the management of industrial enterprises based on innovative development strategies]. Yevropeysʹkyy vektor ekonomichnoho rozvytku [European vector of economic development], 1, 108–125 (in Ukrainian).
31. Nebrat, V. V. (2023). Vidbudova dlya rozvytku: zarubizhnyy dosvid ta ukrayinsʹki perspektyvy: mizhnarodna kolektyvna monohrafiya [Reconstruction for development: foreign experience and Ukrainian perspectives: an international collective monograph]. National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, Electron, Kyiv (in Ukrainian).
32. Orghanichna platforma znanj (2023). Biodynamichne siljsjke ghospodarstvo v Ukrajini. Oghljad rozvytku ta potochnoji sytuaciji [Biodynamic agriculture in Ukraine. Overview of development and current situation]. Access mode: https://organic-platform.org/top_news/biodynamichne-silske-gospodarstvo-v-ukrayini-oglyad-rozvytku-ta-potochnoyisytuacziyi/(in Ukrainian).
33. Orsini, S., Padel, S., & Lampkin, N. Labour. (2018). Use on Organic Farms: a Review of Research since 2000. Organic Farming, 4(1), 7–15. doi: 10.12924/of2018.04010007.
34. Ozdogan, B., Gacar, A., & Aktas, H. (2017). Digital Agriculture Practices in the Context of Agriculture 4.0. Journal of Economics, Finance and Accounting, 4(2), 184–191. doi: 10.17261/Pressacademia.2017.448.
35. Pylypiv, N. I., Pyatnychuk, I. D., & Sologub, S. I. (2021). Rolʹ stratehiyi sotsialʹno-ekonomichnoho rozvytku OTH v konteksti zminy pidkhodiv do rehionalʹnoho rozvytku v Ukrayini [The role of the strategy of socio-economic development of OTG in the context of changing approaches to regional development in Ukraine]. Herald. Mykolayiv National Agrarian University. Access mode: dspace.mnau.edu.ua/jspui/bitstream/123456789/10259/1/53-55.pdf. (in Ukrainian).
36. Qin, T., Wang, L., Zhou, Y., Guo, L., Jiang, G., & Zhang, L. (2022). Digital Technology-and-Services-Driven Sustainable Transformation of Agriculture: Cases of China and the EU. Agriculture, 12, 297. doi: 10.3390/agriculture12020297.
37. Reznichenko, V.P., Kovalʹov, M.M. & Kulyk, H.A. (2019). Obgruntuvannya zamknenoho resursozberihayuchoho vyrobnytstva ekolohichno bezpechnoyi silʹsʹkohospodarsʹkoyi produktsiyi u suchasnykh enerhonezalezhnykh ahroekokompleksakh [Justification of closed resource-saving production of ecologically safe agricultural products in modern energy-independent agro-ecocomplexes]. Tavriysʹkyy naukovyy visnyk [Taurian Scientific Herald], 109 (1), 109–114 doi: 10.32851/2226-0099.2019.109-1.17 (in Ukrainian).
38. Semenyuk, I., Ivanchenko, H., & Veslova, YA. (2023). Stratehichnyy rozvytok hromad v umovakh podolannya voyennykh vyklykiv: proyektnyy pidkhid [Strategic development of communities in the conditions of overcoming military challenges: a project approach]. Ekonomika ta suspilʹstvo, (55). https://doi.org/10.32782/2524-0072/2023-55-5 (in Ukrainian).
39. Takahashi, K., Preetz, H., & Igel, J., (2011). Soil properties and performance of landmine detection by metal detector and ground-penetrating radar – soil characterisation and its verification by a field test. The Journal of Applied Geophysics, 73, 368–377.
40. Tretіak, A. Tretіak, V. Kuriltsiv, R. Priadka, T. & Tretіak, N. (2021). Upravlinnia zemel'nymy resursamy ta zemlekorystuvanniam: bazovi zasady teorii, instytutsiolizatsii, praktyky [Management of land resources and land use: basic principles of theory, institutionalization, practice], Belotserkivdruk LL, Bila Tserkva, Ukraine (in Ukrainian).
41. Santi, M., Sancineto, L., Nascimento, V., Azeredo, J. B., Orozco, E. V. M., Andrade, L. H., Gröger, H., & Santi, C. (2021). Flow Biocatalysis: A Challenging Alternative for the Synthesis of APIs and Natural Compounds. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 22(3), 990. doi: 10.3390/ijms22030990, PMid:33498198 PMCid:PMC7863935.
42. Sitkovska, A. O., & Masliaieva, O. O. (2023). Zemelʹno-resursnyy potentsial ahrarnoho sektoru: stan ta osoblyvosti vykorystannya [Land and resource potential of the agricultural sector: state and features of use]. Agrosvit, 9–10, 77–81 (in Ukrainian).
43. Scholtens, B. (2017). Why Finance Should Care about Ecology. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 32. doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2017.03.013/
44. Vasylenko, I. A., Chuprinov, E. V., Ivanchenko, A. V., Skyba, M. I., Vorobyova, V. I., & Galish, V. V. (2019). Zeleni tekhnolohiyi u promyslovosti: Monohrafiya [Green technologies in industry]. Dnipro (in Ukrainian).
45. Villanueva, J. K. S., & Blanco, A. C. (2019). Optimization of ground control point (GCP) configuration for unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) survey using structure from motion (SFM). The International Archives of Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, 42, 167–174. doi:10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-4-W12-167-2019.
46. Wang, C., & Dong, G. (2019). Research on Green Financial Ecology Construction Based on Low Carbon Economy. Ekoloji, 107, 3635–3641 URL: http://www.ekolojidergisi.com/article/research-on-green-financial-ecology-constructionbased-on-low-carbon-economy-6006.
47. Woo, K. S., & Worboys, G. (2019). Geological monitoring in protected areas, International Journal of Geoheritage and Parks, 7(4), 218–225. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgeop.2019.12.004.
48. Yamelynets, T. (2022). Informatsiyne gruntoznavstvo: monohrafiya [Informational soil science: monograph]. LNU named after Ivan Franko, Lviv (in Ukrainian).
49. Zhang, X., Yao, G., Vishwakarma, S., Musumba, M., Heyman, A. & Eric A., Davidson (2021). Quantitative assessment of agricultural sustainability reveals divergent priorities among nations. One Earthe, 4, 1262–1277.
50. Zghurska, O., Korchynska, O., Rubel, K., Kubiv, S., Tarasiuk, A., & Holovchenko, O. (2022). Digitalization of the national agro-industrial complex: new challenges, realities and prospects. Financial and Credit Activity Problems of Theory and Practice, 6(47), 388–399. doi: 10.55643/fcaptp.6.47.2022.3929.
Published
2024-10-23
How to Cite
Reznichenko, V. P., Kolomiiets, L. V., & СherednychenkoI. V. (2024). USE OF AGRICULTURAL TECHNOLOGIES TO PRESERVE SOIL RESOURCES AND IMPROVE SOIL QUALITY. Bulletin of Sumy National Agrarian University. The Series: Agronomy and Biology, 56(2), 49-56. https://doi.org/10.32782/agrobio.2024.2.7
ISSN 
ISSN 
