PIGMENT CONTENT AND NET PHOTOSYNTHETIC PRODUCTIVITY OF MAIZE WHEN USING PLANT GROWTH REGULATORS
Keywords:
maize, regulator, pigments, chlorophyll, carotenoids, ratio, productivity, photosynthesis, correlation.
Abstract
The article deals with the results of studies on the effect of treatment of maize seeds with the plant growth regulators of natural origin on such parameters of photosynthetic productivity of corn plants as the content of photosynthetic pigments and net productivity of photosynthesis. It was found that the use of pre-sowing treatment of corn seeds with plant growth regulators contributed to the increase in the chlorophyll a and b content, their amount and carotenoid content from 6 to 20 % depending on the pigment and growth regulator. The chlorophyll a/b ratio ranged from 3.19 to 3.25. Determination of the chlorophyll a/b ratio showed that over the years of research in the experimental variants it was not significantly lower compared to the control variant and varied in the experimental variants depending on the type of regulator in the range from 3.19 to 3.25 (decrease relative to the control was 2–4 %). Determination of the ratio of the amount of chlorophylls (a+b)/carotenoids showed that this index in the experimental variants decreased to 5.70–6.11 (up to 8 %) compared to the control variant, where the ratio was 6.15. On the basis of the obtained data concerning the ratio of chlorophylls a/b and the amount of chlorophylls (a+b) to carotenoids, we can state that these indices testify to favorable conditions developed in the experimental variants of seed treatment with plant growth regulators, since the chlorophyll a/b ratio compared to the control variant was almost unchanged, and the ratio of the amount of chlorophylls (a+b) to carotenoids decreased against the control variant. Analysis of the experimental data also showed that the change in the net photosynthetic productivity index in the experimental variants was directly proportional to the change in the content of photosynthetic pigments. Thus, when corn seeds were treated before sowing with the Biosil PGR (20 ml/t), the net photosynthetic productivity index increased by 4 % compared to the control, while when using Biolan (50 ml/t) – by 11 %. The use of Regoplan (200 ml/t) and Zeastimulin (20 ml/t) appeared to be more effective for net photosynthetic productivity of corn plants. In these experimental variants the NFP index exceeded the results obtained in the control variant by 17 and 16 % according to the type of PGR. The regression analysis revealed a close correlation (r2=0,97) between the NFP index of chlorophyll content (a+b) in maize leaves, which is described by the following regression equation: y = 2.477x - 2.3181.
References
1. Rohach, V.V. & Rohach, T.I. (2015). Vplyv syntetychnykh stymulyatoriv rostu na morfofiziolohichni kharakterystyky ta biolohichnu produktyvnist’ kul’tury kartopli [Influence of synthetic growth stimulators on morphological and physiological characteristics and biological productivity of potato culture]. Visnyk Dnipropetrovs’koho universytetu. Biolohiya, ekolohiya, 23(2), 221–224. (in Ukrainian). doi:10.15421/011532
2. Rohach, V.V., Kiriziy, D.A., Stasyk, O.O. & Rohach T.I. (2020). Morfohenez, fotosyntez i produktyvnist’ baklazhaniv za vplyvu rehulyatoriv rostu z riznymy mekhanizmamy diyi [Morphogenesis, photosynthesis and productivity of eggplants under the influence of growth regulators with various action mechanisms]. Fiziolohiya roslyn i henetyka, (2), 152–168. (in Ukrainian). doi.org/10.15407/frg2020.02.152
3. Musatenko, L.I. (2009). Fitohormony i fiziolohichno aktyvni rechovyny v rehulyatsiyi rostu i rozvytku Roslyn [Phytohormones and physiologically active substances in the regulation of plant growth and development]. Fiziolohiya roslyn: problemy ta perspektyvy rozvytku. Kyiv: Lohos, 508–536. (in Ukrainian)
4. Yavors’ka, V.K., Drahovoz, I.V. & Kryuchkova, L.O. (2006). Rehulyatory rostu na osnovi pryrodnoyi syrovyny ta yikh zastosuvannya v roslynnytstvi [Growth regulators based on natural raw materials and their use in crop production]. Kyiv: Lohos, 176. (in Ukrainian)
5. Gavelienė, V., Novicienė, L. & Kazlauskienė D. (2007). Effect of auxin physiological analogues on rape growth and reproductive development. Bot. Lithuan, 13(2), 101–107.
6. Anishyn, L.A., Ponomarenko, S.P. & Hrytsayenko Z.M. (2011). Rehulyatory rostu roslyn. Rekomendatsiyi po zastosuvannyu [Plant growth regulators. Recommendations for use]. Kyiv, 40. (in Ukrainian)
7. Khodanits’ka, O.O. & Kuryata V.H. (2014). Analiz diyi khlormekvatkhlorydu na produktsiynyy protses l’onu oliynoho sortu Orfey [Analysis of the influence of chlormequat-chloride on production process of oil flax of variety orpheus]. Visnyk Vinnyts’koho politekhnichnoho instytutu, (1). 30–33. (in Ukrainian)
8. Kalytka, V.V. & Yalokha, T.M. (2011). Vplyv rehulyatora rostu AKM na produktyvnist’ i yakist’ nasinnya yachmenyu ozymoho zalezhno vid poperednyka v Pivdennomu Stepu Ukrayiny [Effect of growth regulators on AKM productivity and quality of barley seeds depending on winter predecessors in the Southern Steppe Ukraine]. Ahrobiolohiya: zbirnyk naukovykh prats’ BNAU. 6(86), 166–169. (in Ukrainian)
9. Zayets’, S.O. & Kysil,’ L.B. (2019). Fotosyntetychna diyal’nist’ roslyn i vrozhaynist’ zerna yachmenyu ozymoho (Hordeum vulgare L.) zalezhno vid sortu, strokiv sivby ta rehulyatoriv rostu [Photosynthetic activity of plants and grain yield of winter barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) Depending on the variety, sowing dates and growth regulators]. Bioresursy i pryrodokorystuvannya, 1–2(11), 89–97. (in Ukrainian). doi.org/10.30525/978-9934-588-73-0/1.10
10. Buyna, O.I., Buynyy, O.V., Rohach, V.V. & Kuryata V.H. (2018). Vplyv rehulyatoriv rostu roslyn z protylezhnym napryamkom diyi na morfohenez, lystkovyy aparat ta produktyvnist’ tomativ [Influence of plant growth regulators with the reverse effect on morphogenesis, leaf apparatus and productivity of tomatoes]. Tavriys’kyy naukovyy visnyk. 2018, 1 (100), 14–24. (in Ukrainian)
11. Rudnyk-Ivashchenko, O.I. (2009). Produktyvnist’ fotosyntezu v roslyn prosa za fazamy yoho rozvytku na riznykh fonakh mineral’noho zhyvlennya [The productivity of photosynthesis at the plants of millet after the phases of development and mineral feed]. Naukovi dopovidi NUBiP, 3 (15), 110. (in Ukrainian)
12. Pyda, S.V, Tryhuba, O.V. & Hryhoryuk I.P. (2014). Diya bakterial’nykh preparativ ta rehulyatoriv rostu roslyn na fotosyntetychnyy aparat lyupynu biloho (lupinus albus L.) [The effect of bacterial preparations and plant growth regulators on photosynthetic apparatus of Lupinus albus L.]. Bioresursy i pryrodokorystuvannya, 1–2(6), 12–18. (in Ukrainian)
13. Haviy, V.M., Kuchmenko, O.B. & Tereshchenko O.O. (2019). Vplyv biopreparatu Polimiksobakteryn ta imunoprotektora BAI-SI na vmist fotosyntetychnykh pihmentiv i urozhaynist’ kukurudzy [The effect of the biological agent Polymyxobacterin and the BAI-SI immunoprotector on the content of photosynthetic pigments and the yield of corn]. Zbirnyk naukovykh prats’ Umans’koho NUS, 95(1), 65–75. (in Ukrainian). doi 10.31395/2415-8240-2019-95-1-65-75
14. Stasyk, O.O., Kirizii, D. A., Priadkina, H.O. (2021). Fotosyntez i produktyvnist: osnovni naukovi dosiahnennia ta perspektyvni rozrobky [Photosynthesis and productivity: main scientific achievements and innovative developments]. Fiziolohiia roslyn i henetyka, (2), 160–184. doi: https://doi.org/10.15407/2021.02.160
15. Kalytka, V.V. & Karpenko K.M. (2013). Vplyv rehulyatora rostu AKM na pihmentnyy kompleks ta fotosyntetychnu produktyvnist’ roslyn pomidora [Influence of AKM growth regulator on pigment complex and photosynthetic productivity of tomato plants]. Naukovyy visnyk NUBiP, 183(1), 72–77. (in Ukrainian)
16. Scheer, H. (2004). Chlorophylls and сarotenoids. Encyclopedia of Biological Chemistry, 430–437.
17. Karpenko, V.P. & Shutko, S.S. (2018). Vmist khlorofilu i fotosyntetychna produktyvnist’ roslyn soryzu za vykorystannya herbitsydu Pik 75 WG i rehulyatora rostu roslyn Rehoplant [Chlorophyll content and photosynthetic productivity in soriz while applying of Pik 75 WG herbicide and Regoplant plant growth regulator]. Zbirnyk naukovykh prats’ Umans’koho NUS, 93(1), 23–32. (in Ukrainian). doi: 10.31395/2415-8240-2018-93-1-23-32
18. Palamarchuk, V.D. (2019). Vplyv pozakorenevykh pidzhyvlen’ na vmist khlorofilu u hibrydiv kukurudzy riznykh hrup styhlosti [Root fertilizing influence on the chlorophyll contents in maize hybrids in the different groups of maturity]. Sil’s’ke hospodarstvo ta lisivnytstvo: zb. nauk. pr. VNAU, 14, 43–53. (in Ukrainian)
19. Kurylo, V., Grygorenko, N.O. & Marchuk O. (2014). Content and ratio of plastyd green pigments in sugar sorghum leaves depending on nutrition and herbicides correlation effects. Naukovi pratsi instytutu bioenerhetychnykh kul’tur i tsukrovykh buryakiv, 22, 71–74.
20. Haviy, V.M. & Pryplavko S.O. (2019). Formuvannya asymilyatsiynoho aparatu ozymoyi pshenytsi sortu Yuvivata za diyi syntetychnykh rehulyatoriv rostu [The assembling apparatus formation of the winter wheat sort yuvivat by the effect of synthetic growth regulators]. Nauk. Zap. Ternop. Nats. Ped. Un-tu. Ser. Biol., 1(75), 116–120. (in Ukrainian). doi: 10.25128/2078-2357.19.1.15
21. Kuryata, V.H., Rohach, V.V. & Kushnir O.V. (2017). Morfofiziolohichni osoblyvosti formuvannya lystkovoho aparatu pertsyu solodkoho za diyi hiberelinu ta folikuru [Morphological features of leaf apparatus formation of sweet pepper under the influence of giberelin and folicure]. Visnyk ahrarnoyi nauky Prychornomorya, 2 (94), 86–92. (in Ukrainian). doi: 10.31521/2313-092x
22. Kuryata, V.H. & Khodanits’ka, O.O. (2012). Osoblyvosti morfohenezu i produktsiynoho protsesu l’onu-kucheryavtsyu za diyi khlormekvatkhlorydu i treptolemu [Features of morphogenesis and production process of flax under the action of chlormequat chloride and treptolem]. Fyzyolohyya y byokhymyya kul’t. rastenyy, 6 (44), 522–528. (in Ukrainian)
23. Kuryata, V.H. & Polyvanyy, S.V. (2015). Potuzhnist’ fotosyntetychnoho aparatu ta nasinnyeva produktyvnist’ maku oliynoho za diyi retardantu Folikuru [Power of photosynthetic apparatus and seed productivity of oil poppy under the action of Follicur retardant]. Fyzyolohyya rastenyy y henetyka, 4 (47), 313–320. (in Ukrainian)
24. Poltoretskyi S.P. (2017). Formation of density of seed sowing of millet (Panicum miliaceum L.) depending on the term and method of sowing. Bulletin of Uman NUH, 1(59), 59–64.
25. Bessonova, V.P. (2006). Praktykum z fiziolohiyi Roslyn [Workshop on plant physiology]. Dnipropetrovs’k: RVV DDAU, 316. (in Ukrainian)
26. Hrytsayenko, Z.M., Hrytsayenko, A.O. & Karpenko V.P. (2003). Metody biolohichnykh ta ahrokhimichnykh doslidzhen’ roslyn i hruntiv [Methods of biological and agrochemical studies of plants and soils]. Kyiv: ZAT «Nichlava», 320. (in Ukrainian)
27. Katsan, V.A. & Potopal’s’kyy, A.I. (2006). Zminy spivvidnoshennya vmistu deyakykh pihmentiv fotosyntezu, indukovani v Nicotiana tabacum L. ekzohennymy DNK [Changes in the ratio of some photosynthetic pigments induced in Nicotiana tabacum L. by exogenous DNA]. Ukrayins’kyy biokhimichnyy zhurnal, 5(78), 70–80. (in Ukrainian)
28. Tyutyaev, E.V., Shutova, V.V., Maksymov, H.V., Radenovych, Ch.N. & Hrodzynskyy D.M. (2015). Sostoyanye fotosyntetycheskykh pyhmentov v lyst’yakh ynbrednykh lynyy y hybrydov kukuruzy [The state of photosynthetic pigments in the leaves of inbred lines and maize hybrids.]. Fyzyolohyya rastenyy y henetyka, 2 (47), 147–159. (in Ukrainian)
29. Matvyeyeva, N.A. & Kvasko O.Yu. (2010). Vmist fotosyntetychnykh pihmentiv v trans·hennykh roslynakh tsykoriyu z henom tuberkul’oznoho antyhena Esat6 [Content of photosynthetic pigments in transgenic chicory plants with Esat6 tuberculosis antigen gene]. Visnyk Donets’koho natsional’noho universytetu, 2, 249–253. (in Ukrainian)
30. Kononenko, A.O., Drehval’, O.A., Cherevach, N.V., Zhernosyekova, I.V. & Vinnikov A.I. (2015). Vplyv kompleksnoho mikrobnoho insektytsydu “Baktofunhin-LS” na protsesy zhyttyediyal’nosti roslyn [Influence of microbial insecticide “bactofungin-ls” on nhe vital plants processes]. Pytannya stepovoho lisoznavstva ta lisovoyi rekul’tyvatsiyi zemel’, 44, 60–65. (in Ukrainian)
2. Rohach, V.V., Kiriziy, D.A., Stasyk, O.O. & Rohach T.I. (2020). Morfohenez, fotosyntez i produktyvnist’ baklazhaniv za vplyvu rehulyatoriv rostu z riznymy mekhanizmamy diyi [Morphogenesis, photosynthesis and productivity of eggplants under the influence of growth regulators with various action mechanisms]. Fiziolohiya roslyn i henetyka, (2), 152–168. (in Ukrainian). doi.org/10.15407/frg2020.02.152
3. Musatenko, L.I. (2009). Fitohormony i fiziolohichno aktyvni rechovyny v rehulyatsiyi rostu i rozvytku Roslyn [Phytohormones and physiologically active substances in the regulation of plant growth and development]. Fiziolohiya roslyn: problemy ta perspektyvy rozvytku. Kyiv: Lohos, 508–536. (in Ukrainian)
4. Yavors’ka, V.K., Drahovoz, I.V. & Kryuchkova, L.O. (2006). Rehulyatory rostu na osnovi pryrodnoyi syrovyny ta yikh zastosuvannya v roslynnytstvi [Growth regulators based on natural raw materials and their use in crop production]. Kyiv: Lohos, 176. (in Ukrainian)
5. Gavelienė, V., Novicienė, L. & Kazlauskienė D. (2007). Effect of auxin physiological analogues on rape growth and reproductive development. Bot. Lithuan, 13(2), 101–107.
6. Anishyn, L.A., Ponomarenko, S.P. & Hrytsayenko Z.M. (2011). Rehulyatory rostu roslyn. Rekomendatsiyi po zastosuvannyu [Plant growth regulators. Recommendations for use]. Kyiv, 40. (in Ukrainian)
7. Khodanits’ka, O.O. & Kuryata V.H. (2014). Analiz diyi khlormekvatkhlorydu na produktsiynyy protses l’onu oliynoho sortu Orfey [Analysis of the influence of chlormequat-chloride on production process of oil flax of variety orpheus]. Visnyk Vinnyts’koho politekhnichnoho instytutu, (1). 30–33. (in Ukrainian)
8. Kalytka, V.V. & Yalokha, T.M. (2011). Vplyv rehulyatora rostu AKM na produktyvnist’ i yakist’ nasinnya yachmenyu ozymoho zalezhno vid poperednyka v Pivdennomu Stepu Ukrayiny [Effect of growth regulators on AKM productivity and quality of barley seeds depending on winter predecessors in the Southern Steppe Ukraine]. Ahrobiolohiya: zbirnyk naukovykh prats’ BNAU. 6(86), 166–169. (in Ukrainian)
9. Zayets’, S.O. & Kysil,’ L.B. (2019). Fotosyntetychna diyal’nist’ roslyn i vrozhaynist’ zerna yachmenyu ozymoho (Hordeum vulgare L.) zalezhno vid sortu, strokiv sivby ta rehulyatoriv rostu [Photosynthetic activity of plants and grain yield of winter barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) Depending on the variety, sowing dates and growth regulators]. Bioresursy i pryrodokorystuvannya, 1–2(11), 89–97. (in Ukrainian). doi.org/10.30525/978-9934-588-73-0/1.10
10. Buyna, O.I., Buynyy, O.V., Rohach, V.V. & Kuryata V.H. (2018). Vplyv rehulyatoriv rostu roslyn z protylezhnym napryamkom diyi na morfohenez, lystkovyy aparat ta produktyvnist’ tomativ [Influence of plant growth regulators with the reverse effect on morphogenesis, leaf apparatus and productivity of tomatoes]. Tavriys’kyy naukovyy visnyk. 2018, 1 (100), 14–24. (in Ukrainian)
11. Rudnyk-Ivashchenko, O.I. (2009). Produktyvnist’ fotosyntezu v roslyn prosa za fazamy yoho rozvytku na riznykh fonakh mineral’noho zhyvlennya [The productivity of photosynthesis at the plants of millet after the phases of development and mineral feed]. Naukovi dopovidi NUBiP, 3 (15), 110. (in Ukrainian)
12. Pyda, S.V, Tryhuba, O.V. & Hryhoryuk I.P. (2014). Diya bakterial’nykh preparativ ta rehulyatoriv rostu roslyn na fotosyntetychnyy aparat lyupynu biloho (lupinus albus L.) [The effect of bacterial preparations and plant growth regulators on photosynthetic apparatus of Lupinus albus L.]. Bioresursy i pryrodokorystuvannya, 1–2(6), 12–18. (in Ukrainian)
13. Haviy, V.M., Kuchmenko, O.B. & Tereshchenko O.O. (2019). Vplyv biopreparatu Polimiksobakteryn ta imunoprotektora BAI-SI na vmist fotosyntetychnykh pihmentiv i urozhaynist’ kukurudzy [The effect of the biological agent Polymyxobacterin and the BAI-SI immunoprotector on the content of photosynthetic pigments and the yield of corn]. Zbirnyk naukovykh prats’ Umans’koho NUS, 95(1), 65–75. (in Ukrainian). doi 10.31395/2415-8240-2019-95-1-65-75
14. Stasyk, O.O., Kirizii, D. A., Priadkina, H.O. (2021). Fotosyntez i produktyvnist: osnovni naukovi dosiahnennia ta perspektyvni rozrobky [Photosynthesis and productivity: main scientific achievements and innovative developments]. Fiziolohiia roslyn i henetyka, (2), 160–184. doi: https://doi.org/10.15407/2021.02.160
15. Kalytka, V.V. & Karpenko K.M. (2013). Vplyv rehulyatora rostu AKM na pihmentnyy kompleks ta fotosyntetychnu produktyvnist’ roslyn pomidora [Influence of AKM growth regulator on pigment complex and photosynthetic productivity of tomato plants]. Naukovyy visnyk NUBiP, 183(1), 72–77. (in Ukrainian)
16. Scheer, H. (2004). Chlorophylls and сarotenoids. Encyclopedia of Biological Chemistry, 430–437.
17. Karpenko, V.P. & Shutko, S.S. (2018). Vmist khlorofilu i fotosyntetychna produktyvnist’ roslyn soryzu za vykorystannya herbitsydu Pik 75 WG i rehulyatora rostu roslyn Rehoplant [Chlorophyll content and photosynthetic productivity in soriz while applying of Pik 75 WG herbicide and Regoplant plant growth regulator]. Zbirnyk naukovykh prats’ Umans’koho NUS, 93(1), 23–32. (in Ukrainian). doi: 10.31395/2415-8240-2018-93-1-23-32
18. Palamarchuk, V.D. (2019). Vplyv pozakorenevykh pidzhyvlen’ na vmist khlorofilu u hibrydiv kukurudzy riznykh hrup styhlosti [Root fertilizing influence on the chlorophyll contents in maize hybrids in the different groups of maturity]. Sil’s’ke hospodarstvo ta lisivnytstvo: zb. nauk. pr. VNAU, 14, 43–53. (in Ukrainian)
19. Kurylo, V., Grygorenko, N.O. & Marchuk O. (2014). Content and ratio of plastyd green pigments in sugar sorghum leaves depending on nutrition and herbicides correlation effects. Naukovi pratsi instytutu bioenerhetychnykh kul’tur i tsukrovykh buryakiv, 22, 71–74.
20. Haviy, V.M. & Pryplavko S.O. (2019). Formuvannya asymilyatsiynoho aparatu ozymoyi pshenytsi sortu Yuvivata za diyi syntetychnykh rehulyatoriv rostu [The assembling apparatus formation of the winter wheat sort yuvivat by the effect of synthetic growth regulators]. Nauk. Zap. Ternop. Nats. Ped. Un-tu. Ser. Biol., 1(75), 116–120. (in Ukrainian). doi: 10.25128/2078-2357.19.1.15
21. Kuryata, V.H., Rohach, V.V. & Kushnir O.V. (2017). Morfofiziolohichni osoblyvosti formuvannya lystkovoho aparatu pertsyu solodkoho za diyi hiberelinu ta folikuru [Morphological features of leaf apparatus formation of sweet pepper under the influence of giberelin and folicure]. Visnyk ahrarnoyi nauky Prychornomorya, 2 (94), 86–92. (in Ukrainian). doi: 10.31521/2313-092x
22. Kuryata, V.H. & Khodanits’ka, O.O. (2012). Osoblyvosti morfohenezu i produktsiynoho protsesu l’onu-kucheryavtsyu za diyi khlormekvatkhlorydu i treptolemu [Features of morphogenesis and production process of flax under the action of chlormequat chloride and treptolem]. Fyzyolohyya y byokhymyya kul’t. rastenyy, 6 (44), 522–528. (in Ukrainian)
23. Kuryata, V.H. & Polyvanyy, S.V. (2015). Potuzhnist’ fotosyntetychnoho aparatu ta nasinnyeva produktyvnist’ maku oliynoho za diyi retardantu Folikuru [Power of photosynthetic apparatus and seed productivity of oil poppy under the action of Follicur retardant]. Fyzyolohyya rastenyy y henetyka, 4 (47), 313–320. (in Ukrainian)
24. Poltoretskyi S.P. (2017). Formation of density of seed sowing of millet (Panicum miliaceum L.) depending on the term and method of sowing. Bulletin of Uman NUH, 1(59), 59–64.
25. Bessonova, V.P. (2006). Praktykum z fiziolohiyi Roslyn [Workshop on plant physiology]. Dnipropetrovs’k: RVV DDAU, 316. (in Ukrainian)
26. Hrytsayenko, Z.M., Hrytsayenko, A.O. & Karpenko V.P. (2003). Metody biolohichnykh ta ahrokhimichnykh doslidzhen’ roslyn i hruntiv [Methods of biological and agrochemical studies of plants and soils]. Kyiv: ZAT «Nichlava», 320. (in Ukrainian)
27. Katsan, V.A. & Potopal’s’kyy, A.I. (2006). Zminy spivvidnoshennya vmistu deyakykh pihmentiv fotosyntezu, indukovani v Nicotiana tabacum L. ekzohennymy DNK [Changes in the ratio of some photosynthetic pigments induced in Nicotiana tabacum L. by exogenous DNA]. Ukrayins’kyy biokhimichnyy zhurnal, 5(78), 70–80. (in Ukrainian)
28. Tyutyaev, E.V., Shutova, V.V., Maksymov, H.V., Radenovych, Ch.N. & Hrodzynskyy D.M. (2015). Sostoyanye fotosyntetycheskykh pyhmentov v lyst’yakh ynbrednykh lynyy y hybrydov kukuruzy [The state of photosynthetic pigments in the leaves of inbred lines and maize hybrids.]. Fyzyolohyya rastenyy y henetyka, 2 (47), 147–159. (in Ukrainian)
29. Matvyeyeva, N.A. & Kvasko O.Yu. (2010). Vmist fotosyntetychnykh pihmentiv v trans·hennykh roslynakh tsykoriyu z henom tuberkul’oznoho antyhena Esat6 [Content of photosynthetic pigments in transgenic chicory plants with Esat6 tuberculosis antigen gene]. Visnyk Donets’koho natsional’noho universytetu, 2, 249–253. (in Ukrainian)
30. Kononenko, A.O., Drehval’, O.A., Cherevach, N.V., Zhernosyekova, I.V. & Vinnikov A.I. (2015). Vplyv kompleksnoho mikrobnoho insektytsydu “Baktofunhin-LS” na protsesy zhyttyediyal’nosti roslyn [Influence of microbial insecticide “bactofungin-ls” on nhe vital plants processes]. Pytannya stepovoho lisoznavstva ta lisovoyi rekul’tyvatsiyi zemel’, 44, 60–65. (in Ukrainian)
Published
2022-05-24
How to Cite
Zabolotna, A. V., Zabolotnyi, O. I., Rozborska, L. V., Zhilyak, I. D., & Datsenko, A. A. (2022). PIGMENT CONTENT AND NET PHOTOSYNTHETIC PRODUCTIVITY OF MAIZE WHEN USING PLANT GROWTH REGULATORS. Bulletin of Sumy National Agrarian University. The Series: Agronomy and Biology, 46(4), 9-15. https://doi.org/10.32845/agrobio.2021.4.2
ISSN 
ISSN 
