THE EFFICIENCY OF SELECTION AND THE RELATIONSHIP OF REPRODUCTIVE QUALITIES OF SOWS IN THE CONDITIONS OF INDUSTRIAL FARMS IN THE WESTERN PART OF THE JUTLAND PENINSULA

Keywords: sow, reproductive qualities, intensity of use, conservation, feed consumption, correlations

Abstract

It was established that due to the focus of breeding Danish pigs on improving fertility, its annual increase was 1.63% over the 10 years studied, the number of weaned piglets per sow increased annually during this period by –1.53%, the litter weight of piglets at birth by 0, 81% and at weaning by 0.90%. At the same time, the number of signs negatively correlated with multiple fertility decreased annually over the last decade. Thus, high fertility decreased annually by 0.71%, the weight of one piglet at weaning by 0.52%, the average daily growth during the suckling period by 0.77%, the absolute growth during this period by 0.47%, and the survival of piglets before weaning by 0.08%. But, despite the decrease in some signs of reproductive capacity, due to a significant increase in the number of live piglets at birth, the comprehensive indices of reproductive qualities of sows increased by 1.26–1.45% annually. It has been proven that the intensive selection of sows of Danish breeding to increase fertility contributed to an annual increase of 1.54% in the number of piglets weaned from the sow per year, caused a 0.32% extension of the duration of lactation and increased the mortality of sows by 0.13%. At the same time, along with improving the conditions of keeping and feeding sows, it contributed to a 1.69% reduction in the number of non–productive days in a sow per year, a reduction in annual feed costs per sow by 0.90% and by 2.12% per weaned piggy. According to calculations of the strength and direction of the relationship between the main reproductive and technological traits, it was established that multifertility had a very high direct probable correlation strength with the number of weaned piglets per farrowing (r = 0.95); by the number of weaned piglets per sow per year (r = 0.90); high direct probable strength of correlation with nest mass at weaning (r = 0.81); a weak direct relationship with the duration of lactation (r = 0.28); a weak feedback relationship with the weight of one piglet at weaning (r = – 0.25) and the survival of piglets (r = – 0.11). The number of piglets weaned per sow per year was positively correlated with very high strength (r = 0.96) with the number of piglets at weaning per farrowing; multiple fertility (r = 0.90); moderate strength (r = 0.63) with the weight of the nest of piglets at weaning, weak strength with the duration of lactation (r = 0.03) and preservation – (r = 0.22), and a weak inverse correlation of moderate strength with mass of one piglet at weaning (r = – 0.43). The litter weight of piglets at weaning had a strong positive correlation with multiple fertility (r = 0.81), the number of piglets weaned from a sow per farrowing (r = 0.73) and per year (r = 0.63), a weak positive correlation with the duration of lactation (r = 0.25) and a weak inverse correlation with the survival of piglets (r = –0.20) and the weight of one piglet at weaning (r = –0.18).

References

1. Alam, M., Chang, H.-K., Lee, S.-S. & Choi, T.-J. (2021). Genetic analysis of major production and reproduction traits of Korean Duroc, Landrace, and Yorkshire pigs. Animals, 11, 1321. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11051321.
2. Amer, P.R., Ludemann, C.I. & Hermesch, S. (2014). Economic weights for maternal traits of sows, including sow longevity. Journal of Animal Science, 92(12), 5345–5357. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25367527/
3. Chen, P., Baas, T.J., Mabry, J.W., Koehler, K.J. & Dekkers, J.C.M. (2003). Genetic parameters and trends for litter traits in U.S. Yorkshire, Duroc, Hampshire, and landrace pigs. Journal of Animal Science, 81(1), 46–53. https://doi.org/10.2527/2003.81146x.
4. Dube, B., Mulugeta, S.D. & Dzama, K. (2013). Integrating economic parameters into genetic selection for Large White pigs. Animal, 7, 1231–1238. URL: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1751731113000530
5. Getia, A.A. (2009). Orhanizatsiia selektsiinoho protsesu v suchasnomu svynarstvi: monohrafiia [Organization of the breeding process in modern pig breeding: monograph]. Poltava: Poltavskyi literator, 192 p. URL: https://svinarstvo.com/index.php/ua/library/naukova–literatura/558–book013 (in Ukrainian)
6. Holm, B., Bakken, M., Vangen, O. & Rekaya, R. (2004). Genetic correlations between reproduction and production traits in swine. Journal of Animal Science, 2, 3458–3464. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15537764/
7. Hopka, B.M., Kovalenko, V.P., Melnyk, Yu.F., Naidenko, K.A., Nezhlukchenko, T.I., Pelykh, V.H., Rudyk, I.A., Sakhatskyi, M.I., Trofymenko, O.L., Uhnivenko, A.M., Tsytsiurskyi, L.M. & Sheremeta, V.I. (2007). Selektsiia silskohospodarskykh tvaryn [Selection of farm animals]. Kyiv: Knyha, 554 p. (in Ukrainian)
8. Hryshyna, L.P., Voloshchuk, V.M. & Aknevskyi, Yu.P. (2015). Metodolohiia stvorennia spetsializovannoho typu svynei: monohrafiia [Methodology of creating a specialized type of pigs: monograph]. Poltava: TOV «Firma Tekhservis», 233 p. URL: https://svinarstvo.com/index.php/ua/library/naukova–literatura/561–book025 (in Ukrainian)
9. Ibatulin, I. I., & Zhukorskyi, O. M. (2017). Metodolohiia ta orhanizatsiia naukovykh doslidzhen u tvarynnytstvi [Methodology and organization of scientific research in animal husbandry]. K., 328. (іn Ukrainian)
10. Khvatov, A.I. & Khvatova, M.A. (2015). Selektsiino-henetychni dosiahnennia svynarstva v istorychnykh ta teoretyko–metodolohichnykh aspektakh [Breeding and genetic achievements of pig breeding in historical and theoretical and methodological aspects]. Naukovo-tekhnichnyi biuleten IT NAAN, 114, 172–182. URL: http://irbis–nbuv.gov.ua/cgi–bin/irbis_nbuv/cgiirbis_64.exe?C21COM=2&I21DBN=UJRN&P21DBN=UJRN&IMAGE_FILE_DOWNLOAD=1&Image_file_name=PDF/Ntb_2015_114_31.pdf
11. Koketsu, Y., Tani, S. & Iida, R. (2017). Factors for improving reproductive performance of sows and herd productivity in commercial breeding herds. Porcine Health Management, 3(1), 1. URL: https://porcinehealthmanagement.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s40813–016–0049–7.
12. Kramer, L.M., Ania, W., Hadi, E., Thekkoot, D.M., Zhang, C. & Kemp, R.A. (2021). Purebred-crossbred genetic parameters for reproductive traits in swine. Journal of Animal Science, 99(3), skab270. https://doi.org/10.1093/jas/skab270.
13. Krupa, E. & Wolf, J. (2013). Simultaneous estimation of genetic parameters for production and litter size traits in Czech Large White and Czech Landrace pigs. Czech Journal of Animal Science, 58(9), 429–436. URL: http://cjas.agriculturejournals.cz/artkey/cjs–201309–0006_simultaneous–estimation–of–genetic–parameters–for–production–and–litter–size–traits–in–czech–large–white–and–cz.php
14. Ladyka, V. I., Khmelnychiy, L. M. & Povod, M. G. (2023). Tekhnolohiia vyrobnytstva i pererobky produktsii tvarynnytstva: pidruchnyk dlia aspirantiv [Technology of production and processing of livestock products: a textbook for graduate students]. Odesa: Oldi+, 244. (in Ukrainian)
15. Lopez, B.I.M. & Seo, K. (2019). Genetic parameters for litter traits at different parities in purebred Landrace and Yorkshire pigs. Animal Science Journal, 90, 1497–1502. https://doi.org/10.1111/asj.13298.
16. Lykhach, V.Ia., Lykhach, A.V., Faustov, R.V. & Kucher, O.O. (2021). Suchasnyi stan ta tendentsii rozvytku vitchyznianoho svynarstva [The current state and trends in the development of domestic pig farming]. Visnyk Sumskoho natsionalnoho ahrarnoho universytetu. Seriia "Tvarynnytstvo", 1(44), 69–71. URL: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/354328282_SUCASNIJ_STAN_TA_TENDENCII_ROZVITKU_VITCIZNANOGO_SVINARSTVA (in Ukrainian)
17. Mykhalko, O.G. & Povod, M.G. (2019). Sezonna zalezhnist produktyvnosti svynomatok danskoho pokhodzhennia vid konstruktyvnykh osoblyvostei system ventyliatsii prymishchen u period oporosu ta laktatsii [Seasonal dependence of the productivity of sows of Danish origin on the design features of room ventilation systems during farrowing and lactation]. Visnyk Sumskoho natsionalnoho ahrarnoho universytetu. Seriia "Tvarynnytstvo", 3(38), 77–90. URL: http://repo.snau.edu.ua/handle/123456789/8523 (in Ukrainian)
18. Mykhalko, O.G. (2021). Suchasnyi stan ta shliakhy rozvytku svynarstva v sviti ta Ukraini. Visnyk Sumskoho natsionalnoho ahrarnoho universytetu [The current state and ways of development of pig farming in the world and in Ukraine]. Seriia "Tvarynnytstvo", 3(46), 61–78. https://doi.org/10.32845/bsnau.lvst.2021.3.9. (in Ukrainian)
19. Nguyen, T.Q., Knap, P.W., Simm, G., Edwards, S.A. & Roehe, R. (2021). Evaluation of direct and maternal responses in reproduction traits based on different selection strategies for postnatal piglet survival in a selection experiment. Genetics Selection Evolution, 53(1), 1–16. URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33722208.
20. Ogawa, S., Konta, A., Kimata, M., Ishii, K., Uemoto, Y. & Satoh, M. (2019). Estimation of genetic parameters for farrowing traits in purebred landrace and large white pigs. Animal Science Journal, 90(1), 23–28. https://doi.org/10.1111/asj.13120.
21. Oh, S.H., Lee, D.H. & See, M.T. (2006). Estimation of genetic parameters for reproductive traits between first and later parities in pig. Asian–Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences, 19(1), 7–12. https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2006.7.
22. Povod, M., Mykhalko, O., Verbelchuk, T., Gutyj, B., Borshchenko, V. & Koberniuk, V. (2023). Productivity of sows, growth of piglets and fattening qualities of pigs at different durations of the suckling period. Scientific Papers Series Management, Economic Engineering in Agriculture and Rural Development, 23(1), 649–459. URL: https://managementjournal.usamv.ro/pdf/vol.23_1/volume_23_1_2023.pdf.
23. Povod, M.H., Korzh, O.V. & Nesterov, A.M. (2017). Vplyv pory roku na vidtvorni yakosti svynomatok danskoi selektsii [The influence of the season on the reproductive qualities of sows of Danish breeding]. Visnyk Sumskoho natsionalnoho ahrarnoho universytetu. Seriia: Tvarynnytstvo, 5(2), 111–113. URL: http://www.irbis–nbuv.gov.ua/cgi–bin/irbis_nbuv/cgiirbis_64.exe?I21DBN=LINK&P21DBN=UJRN&Z21ID=&S21REF=10&S21CNR=20&S21STN=1&S21FMT=ASP_meta&C-21COM=S&2_S21P03=FILA=&2_S21STR=Vsna_tvar_2017_5(2)__24 (in Ukrainian)
24. Povod, M.H., Shvachka, R.P., Mykhalko, O.H. & Yurieva, K.V. (2019). Produktyvni yakosti svynomatok ta yikhnoho potomstva zalezhno vid tryvalosti pidsysnoho periodu [Productive qualities of sows and their offspring depending on the duration of the suckling period]. Visnyk Sumskoho natsionalnoho ahrarnoho universytetu. Seriia "Tvarynnytstvo", 4(39), 72. URL: http://repo.snau.edu.ua/xmlui/handle/123456789/8511?locale–attribute=ru (in Ukrainian)
25. Quinton, V.M., Wilton, J.W., Robinson, J.A. & Mathur, P.K. (2006). Economic weights for sow productivity traits in nucleus pig populations. Livestock Science, 99, 69–77. URL: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301622605001818
26. Radnóczi, L., Novozánszky, G., Baltay, M., Csóka, L., Eicher, J. & Fekete, B. (2017). Ertés teljesítményvizsgálati kódex, Budapest, 39. URL: http://www.mfse.eu/modul/_files/k_dex_8_2017.pdf
27. Roehe, R. & Kennedy, B.W. (1995). Estimation of genetic parameters for litter size in Canadian Yorkshire and landrace swine with each parity of farrowing treated as a different trait. Journal of Animal Science, 73(10), 2959–2970. https://doi.org/10.2527/1995.73102959x.
28. Roehe, R. & Kennedy, B.W. (1995). Estimation of genetic parameters for litter size in Canadian Yorkshire and landrace swine with each parity of farrowing treated as a different trait. Journal of Animal Science, 73(10), 2959–2970. https://doi.org/10.2527/1995.73102959x.
29. Sell-Kubiak, E., Knol, E.F., Mulder, H.A. & Pszczola, M. (2021). Unraveling the actual background of second litter syndrome in pigs: based on large white data. Animal, 15(1), 100033. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.animal.2020.100033.
30. Serenius, T., Muhonen, P. & Stalder, K. (2007). Economic values of pork production related traits in Finland. Agricultural and Food Science, 16, 79–88. URL: https://jukuri.luke.fi/handle/10024/464770
31. Southwood, O.I. & Kennedy, B.W. (1990). Estimation of direct and maternal genetic variance for litter size in Canadian Yorkshire and landrace swine using an animal model. Journal of Animal Science, 68(7), 1841–1847. URL: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10321596/.
32. Stalder, K.J., Lacy, R.C., Cross, T.L. & Conatser, G.E. (2003). Financial impact of average parity of culled females in a breed-to-wean swine operation using replacement gilt net present value analysis. Journal of Swine Health and Production, 11(2), 69–74. URL: https://www.aasv.org/shap/issues/v11n2/v11n2p69.html.
33. Starodubets, O.O. (2015). Vplyv sezonu roku na vidtvoriuvalni yakosti svynomatok [The influence of the season on the reproductive qualities of sows]. Visnyk ahrarnoi nauky Prychornomoria, 4(2), 100–103. URL: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/367856924_ZALEZNIST_VIDTVORUVALNIH_AKOSTEJ_SVINOMATOK_VID_TRIVALOSTI_PIDSISNOGO_PERIODU_VARIANTU_POEDNANNA_PORID_V_RIZNI_PORI_ROKU (in Ukrainian)
34. Tantasuparuk, W., Lundeheim, N., Dalin, A.-M., Kunavongkrit, A. & Einarsson, S. (2000). Reproductive performance of purebred Landrace and Yorkshire sows in Thailand with special reference to seasonal influence and parity number. Theriogenology, 54, 481–496. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0093–691X(00)00364–2.
35. Tinh, N.H., Hao, T.V. & Bui, A.P.N. (2021). Genetic parameters and litter trait trends of Danish pigs in South Vietnam. Animal Bioscience, 34(12), 1903–1911. https://doi.org/10.5713/ab.20.0692.
36. Tsereniuk, O. M. (2014). Heterosis in different combinations of pigs. Agribusiness today. URL: https://agro–business.com.ua/agro/suchasne–tvarynnytstvo/item/8091–heterozys–za–riznykh–poiednan–svynei.html (data zvernennia 01.07.2024)
37. Tsereniuk, O.M., Khvatov, A.I. & Stryzhak, T.A. (2010). Otsinka efektyvnosti indeksiv materynskoi produktyvnosti svynei [Evaluation of the efficiency of indices of maternal productivity of pigs]. Zbirnyk naukovykh prats VNAU. Suchasni problemy selektsii, rozvedennia ta hihiieny tvaryn, 3(42), 73–77. URL: http://socrates.vsau.edu.ua/repository/getfile.php/6689.pdf. (in Ukrainian)
38. Tummaruk, P., Lundeheim, N., Einarsson, S. & Dalin, A.–M. (2001). Effect of birth litter size, birth parity number, growth rate, backfat thickness and age at first mating of gilts on their reproductive performance as sows. Animal Reproduction Science, 66, 225–237. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378–4320(01)00095–1.
39. Untaru, R.C., Petroman, I., Păcală, N., Petroman, C., Marin, D. & Peţ, I. (2011). Season and parity influence upon sows prolificacy and stillborn. Agri Management: Lucrari Stiintifice Seria I Management Agricol. URL: https://oa.mg/work/350482753
40. Van, V.T.K. & Due, N.V. (1999). Heritabilities, genetic and phenotypic correlations between reproductive performance in Mong Ca1 and Large White breeds. Proceedings of the Association for the Advancement of Animal Breeding and Genetics, 13. URL: http://www.aaabg.org/livestocklibrary/1999/AB99031.pdf
41. Wolfová, M., Wolf, J., Krupová, Z., Krupa, E. & Žáková, E. (2017). Estimation of economic values for traits of pig breeds in different breeding systems: I. Model development. Livestock Science, 205, 79–87. URL: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1871141317302846
42. Yang, Y., Gan, M., Yang, X., Zhu, P., Luo, Y., Liu, B., Zhu, K., Cheng, W., Chen, L., Zhao, Y., Niu, L., Wang, Y., Zhang, H., Wang, J. & Shen, L. (2023). Estimation of genetic parameters of pig reproductive traits. URL: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10321596/ (data zvernennia 02.02.2024)
43. Yu, G., Wang, C. & Wang, Y. (2022). Genetic parameter analysis of reproductive traits in large white pigs. Animal Bioscience, 35, 1649–1655. https://doi.org/10.5713/ab.22.0119.
44. Zak, L.J., Gaustad, A.H., Bolarin, A., Broekhuijse, M.L.W.J., Walling, G.A. & Knol, E.F. (2017). Genetic control of complex traits, with a focus on reproduction in pigs. Molecular Reproduction and Development, 84(9), 1004–1011. URL: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/authored–by/Bolarin/Alfonso.
45. Zhang, T., Wang, L.G., Shi, H.B., Hua, Y., Zhang, L.C., Xin, L.I.U. & Wang, L.X. (2016). Heritabilities and genetic and phenotypic correlations of litter uniformity and litter size in Large White sows. Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 15(4), 848–854. URL: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2095311915611558
46. Zhukorskyi, O.M., Tsereniuk, O.M. & Akimov, O.V. (2017). Pidvyshchennia vidtvornoi zdatnosti svynomatok uelskoi porody [Increasing the reproductive capacity of sows of the Welsh breed]. Visnyk ahrarnoi nauky, 9, 31–34.https://doi.org/10.31073/agrovisnyk201709–05 (in Ukrainian)
47. Zhyzhka, S.V., Povod, M.H. & Samokhina, Ye.A. (2018). Zalezhnist parametriv mikroklimatu ta produktyvnosti laktuiuchykh svynomatok i rostu pidsysnykh porosiat vid riznykh system ventyliatsii u zymovu poru roku [Dependence of microclimate parameters and productivity of lactating sows and growth of suckling piglets on different ventilation systems in the winter season]. Visnyk Sumskoho natsionalnoho ahrarnoho universytetu. Seriia "Tvarynnytstvo", 7(35), 268–285. URL; https://nubip.edu.ua/sites/default/files/u104/visnik_sumskogo_nacionalnogo_agrarnogo_universitetu.pdf. (in Ukrainian)
Published
2024-10-08
How to Cite
Voshchenko, I. B. (2024). THE EFFICIENCY OF SELECTION AND THE RELATIONSHIP OF REPRODUCTIVE QUALITIES OF SOWS IN THE CONDITIONS OF INDUSTRIAL FARMS IN THE WESTERN PART OF THE JUTLAND PENINSULA. Bulletin of Sumy National Agrarian University. The Series: Livestock, (3), 10-18. https://doi.org/10.32782/bsnau.lvst.2024.3.2