RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE REPRODUCTIVE QUALITIES OF SOWS AND THE POWER OF INFLUENCE ON THE BREED AND METHOD OF BREEDING
Keywords:
breeding, crossbreeding, multiplicity, preservation, piglets, sow.
Abstract
The article describes the results of studying the reproductive qualities of sows of Great White and Landrace breeds in their purebred breeding and crossing in the breeder. The productivity of Landrace and Large White sows was compared with their purebred breeding in GGP herd conditions under their direct and reciprocal crossing in GP level conditions. The correlations between the indicators of sows' reproductive capacity for each of the breeds and the degree of influence of breed affiliation and breeding method on the change in the level of basic reproductive qualities are calculated. It was found that the total number of piglets at birth and the number of piglets did not depend on the method of breeding, while the survival of piglets before weaning and their number during this period tended to increase in sows GGP herd where purebred breeding was used. It was proved that sows of Large White breed showed a tendency to increase the total number of piglets at birth and fertility compared to analogues of Landrace breed, while the indicators of survival of piglets before weaning and their number at weaning was reversed. It was determined that in sows of both mother breeds there was a strong direct relationship between the total number of piglets at birth and fertility (r = 0.67–0.88) and a strong negative relationship between fertility and survival of piglets (r = - 0.63–0.70). Of medium strength, a direct relationship was found between the safety of piglets and their number at weaning (r = 0.34–0.52), between the safety and proportion of stillborn piglets (r = 0.43–0.47) and the same inverse strength the relationship between the total number of piglets at birth and their safety (r = - 0.33–0.52), fertility and the proportion of stillborn piglets (r = -0.37–0.43). Other signs of reproducibility were associated with weak correlations. The strength of the influence of breed factors and breeding methods only on the total number of piglets at birth, the proportion of stillborn piglets and fertility, in its absence on the rest of the indicators of reproductive capacity. The influence of breed factors was significantly higher compared to the method of breeding.
References
1. Anastiuk, R. (2022). Faktorialna zalezhnist vidtvoriuvalnykh yakostei chystoporodnykh ta pomisnykh svynomatok v umovakh POP «Viktoriia» Bashtanskoho raionu [Factorial dependence of reproductive qualities of purebred and local sows in the conditions of POP "Victoria" of Bashtansky district]. Kvalifikatsiina (dyplomna) robota. 1–68 (in Ukrainian) http://dspace.mnau.edu.ua/jspui/bitstream/123456789/11032/1/%D0%94%D0%B8%D0%BF%D0%BB %D0%BE%D0%BC_%D0%90%D0%BD%D0%B0%D1%81%D1%82%D1%8E%D0%BA_%D0%9E%D0%A1204_ %D0%9C.pdf
2. Berezovskyi, M. D., Hetia, A. A. & Manko, O. A. (2010). Polipshennia miasnykh yakostei svynei velykoi biloi porody metodamy vnutrishnoporodnoi selektsii [Improving the meat quality of large white pigs by inbreeding]. Visnyk ahrarnoi nauky Prychornomoria. 1, 38–44 (in Ukrainian)
3. Berezovskyi, N. D. & Hyria, V. N. (1991). Otsenka kombynatsyonnoi sposobnosty spetsyalyzyrovannikh typov krupnoi beloi porody svynei [Estimation of combinatorial ability of specialized types of large white pig breed]. Tsytolohyia y henetyka. 25(6), 56–60 (in Ukrainian)
4. Erickson, D. L. & Fenster, C. B. (2006). Іntraspecific hybridization and the recovery of fitness in the native legume chamaecrista fasciculata. Evolution, issue 60(2), 225–233. https://doi.org/10.1554/05-020.1
5. Evin, A., Dobney, K. & Schafberg, R. (2015). Phenotype and animal domestication: A study of dental variation between domestic, wild, captive, hybrid and insular. Sus scrofa . BMC Evol Biol. 15, 6. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12862-014-0269-x
6. Fediaieva, A. S. (2019). Obgruntuvannia efektyvnoi systemy porodno-liniinoi hibrydyzatsii za vykorystannia terminalnykh knuriv [Substantiation of an effective system of breed-linear hybridization using terminal boars]. Thethis of PhD dissertation. Kharkiv (in Ukrainian).
7. Hallauer, A. R., Carena, M. J., Miranda Filho, J. D. (2010). Quantitative Genetics in Maize Breeding, Vol. 6. Berlin: Springer Science & Business Media. https://www.amazon.com/Quantitative-Genetics-Maize-Breeding-Handbook/ dp/1441907653
8. Herbst, R. H., Bar-Zvi, D., Reikhav, S., Soifer, I., Breker, M., Jona, G. (2017). Heterosis as a consequence of regulatory incompatibility. BMC Biol., 15, 38. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12915-017-0373-7
9. Holm, B. (2004). Genetic correlations between reproduction and production traits in swine. J. Anim. Sci., 2, 3458–3464. https://doi.org/10.2527/2004.82123458x 10. Holtkamp, D. J., Kliebenstein, J. B., Neumann, E. J, Zimmerman, J. J. & Rotto, H. F. (2013). Assessment of the economic impact of porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus on United States pork producers. J Swine Health Prod. 21, 72–84. https://www.aasv.org/shap/issues/v21n2/v21n2p72.pdf
11. Horbachova, N. O. (2002). Reproduktyvni yakosti svynomatok velykoi biloi porody pry riznykh poiednanniakh [Reproductive qualities of sows of large white breed in different combinations]. Visnyk PDAA. 5–6, 39–48 (in Ukrainian).
12. Hryshyna, L. P., Piddubna, A. M. & Rud, S. S. (2021). Vykorystannia svynei miasnykh porid vitchyznianoi selektsii u systemi hibrydyzatsii Ukrainy [The use of pigs of meat breeds of domestic selection in the hybridization system of Ukraine, Meat genotypes of pigs: present and future], Miasni henotypy svynei: sohodennia ta perspektyvy.: materialy Mizhnarodnoi naukovo-praktychnoi konferentsii naukovo-pedahohichnykh pratsivnykiv ta molodykh naukovtsiv [Proceedings of the International scientific-practical conference of scientific and pedagogical workers and young scientists], Odesa, 8–11 (in Ukrainian).
13. Khramkova, O. M. (2019). Vidtvoriuvalni yakosti svynomatok za riznykh poiednan porid i typiv [Reproductive qualities of sows in different combinations of breeds and types]. Theoretical and Applied Veterinary Medicine, 7(2), 115–119. (in Ukrainian). https://doi.org/ 10.32819/2019.71021
14. Kemp, B., Da Silva, C. & Soede, N. M. (2018). Recent advances in pig reproduction: Focus on impact of genetic selection for female fertility. Reproduction in domestic animals. 53(2), 28–36. https://doi.org/10.1111/rda.13264
15. Knecht, D., Srodon, S. & Duziński, K. (2015). Breed on selected reproductive performance parameters of sows. Arch. Anim. Breed, 58, 49–56. https://doi.org/10.5194/aab-58-49-2015, 2015.
16. Kramarenko, S. S., Luhovyi, S. I., & Lykhach, A. V. (2019). Analiz biometrychnykh danykh u rozvedenni ta selektsii tvaryn: navchalnyi posibnyk. Mykolaiv: MNAU, 211 p (in Ukrainian).
17. Kremez, M. I., Povod, M. G., Mykhalko, O. G., Susol, R. L., Trybrat, R. O., Onishenko, L. M., Kravchenko, O. O., Verbelchuk, T. V., & Sherbyna, O. V. (2022). Reproductive characteristics of pigs of Irish selection and manifestation of different forms of heterosis by different methods of breeding in modern conditions of industrial pork production. Scientific Messenger of Lviv National University of Veterinary Medicine and Biotechnologies. Series: Agricultural sciences, 24(96), 78–88 (in Ukrainian). https://doi.org/ 10.32718/nvlvet-a9610
18. Krupa, E. & Wolf, J. (2013). Simultaneous estimation of genetic parameters for production and litter size traits in Czech Large White and Czech Landrace pigs. Czech J. Anim. Sci., 58(9), 429–436. https://www.agriculturejournals.cz/ publicFiles/99612.pdf
19. Lisnyi, V. A. (1997). Otrymannia bahatorazovoho heterozysa v svynarstvi [Obtaining multiple heterosis in pig farming]. Tavriiskyi naukovyi visnyk. 2, 79–83 (in Ukrainian).
20. Mykhailov, N. V. (2012). Svynovodstvo: perspektyvy otrasly y problem [Pig breeding: industry prospects and problems]. Perspektyvnoe svynovodstvo: Teoryia y praktyka [Promising pig breeding: Theory and practice]. 2, 1–4 (in Ukrainian).
21. Mykhalko, O. H. & Povod M. H. (2019). Vidtvoriuvalni yakosti svynomatok danskoho ta frantsuzkoho pokhodzhennia v umovakh promyslovoho kompleksu [Reproductive qualities of sows of Danish and French origin in the conditions of an industrial complex]. Visnyk Sumskoho natsionalnoho ahrarnoho universytetu. Seriia: Tvarynnytstvo. 1-2(36-37), 15–25 (in Ukrainian).
22. Mykhalko, O. H., Povod, M. H. & Andriichuk, V. F. (2021). Vplyv metodiv rozvedennia ta viku svynomatok danskoi selektsii na yikh produktyvnist [Influence of breeding methods and age of Danish sows on their productivity]. NTB IT NAAN [NTB IT NAAN], 125, 161–179 (in Ukrainian).
23. Nikitchenko, I. N., Nikitenko, R. N. & Gorin, V. V. (1991). Programma gibridizatsii v svinovodstve Belorussii na osnove selektsionno-gibridnykh tsentrov. Povysheniye effektivnosti svinovodstva [Hybridization program in pig breeding in Belarus based on hybrid breeding centers. Improving the efficiency of pig breeding]. Moscow. Agroizdat (in Russian).
24. Shull, G. H. (1910). Hybridization methods in corn breeding. Amer. Breeding Magazine. 1, 98–107. https://doi. org/10.1093/jhered/1.2.98
25. Nwakpu, P. E. & Ugwu, S. O. C. (2009). Heterosis for litter traits in native by exotic inbred pig crosses. Journal of Tropical Agriculture, Food, Environment and Extension, 8(1), pp. 31–37. https://doi.org/10.4314/as.v8i1.44111
26. Ohloblia, V. V. & Povod, M. H. (2020). Vidtvoriuvalni yakosti svynomatok irlandskoho pokhodzhennia za chystoporodnoho rozvedennia ta skhreshchuvannia v umovakh promyslovoho kompleksu. Visnyk Sumskoho natsionalnoho ahrarnoho universytetu. Seriia «Tvarynnytstvo». 1 (40), 103–107. https://doi.org/10.32845/bsnau.lvst.2020.1.15
27. Onyshchenko, A. O. (2013). Promyslove skhreshchuvannia i hibrydyzatsiia, yikh efektyvnist u svynarstvi [Industrial crossbreeding and hybridization, their effectiveness in pig breeding]. Pig breeding. 62, 72–76 (in Ukrainian).
28. Shcherban, T. V. (2014). Reproduktyvni yakosti svynomatok myrhorodskoi porody za skhreshchuvannia z knuramy miasnoho napriamu produktyvnosti. Visnyk Poltavskoi derzhavnoi ahrarnoi akademii. 1, 125–129 (in Ukrainian). http:// journals.pdaa.edu.ua/visnyk/article/download/843/1115/
29. Suslyna, E. N. & Novykov, A. A. (2011). Metodycheskye aspekty povyshenyia effektyvnosty hybrydyzatsyy v svynovodstve [Methodological aspects of improving the efficiency of hybridization in pig breeding]. Svynovodstvo, 4, 12–15 (in Ukrainian).
30. Tomin, Y. F. (2007). Vidtvorni yakosti svynomatok velykoi biloi porody za riznykh metodiv rozvedennia [Reproductive qualities of sows of large white breed by different breeding methods]. Naukovi dopovidi NAU [Scientific reports of NAU], 2(7). [Elektronnyi resurs] (in Ukrainian). Rezhym dostupu: http://www.nbuv.gov.ua/e-Journals/nd/2007-2/07tyfmoc.pdf
31. Ushakova, S. V. (2021). Pokaznyky vidtvoriuvalnoi zdatnosti u bahatoporodnomu skhreshchuvanni svynei [Indicators of reproductive ability in multi-breed crossbreeding of pigs]. Zbirnyk materialiv 75-i Vseukrainskoi naukovopraktychnoi konferentsii. Kyiv: NUBiP, Ukraine, 91–92 (in Ukrainian).
32. Van, V. T. K. & Due N. V. (1999). Heritabilities, genetic and phenotypic correlations between reproductive performance in Mong Ca1 and Large White breeds. Proc. Assoc. Advmt/Anim. Breed. Genet. 13, 153–156.
33. Xu, Y., Li, P., Zou, C., Lu, Y., Xie, C., & Zhang, X. (2017). Enhancing genetic gain in the era of molecular breeding. J. Exp. Bot. 68, 2641–2666. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erx135
2. Berezovskyi, M. D., Hetia, A. A. & Manko, O. A. (2010). Polipshennia miasnykh yakostei svynei velykoi biloi porody metodamy vnutrishnoporodnoi selektsii [Improving the meat quality of large white pigs by inbreeding]. Visnyk ahrarnoi nauky Prychornomoria. 1, 38–44 (in Ukrainian)
3. Berezovskyi, N. D. & Hyria, V. N. (1991). Otsenka kombynatsyonnoi sposobnosty spetsyalyzyrovannikh typov krupnoi beloi porody svynei [Estimation of combinatorial ability of specialized types of large white pig breed]. Tsytolohyia y henetyka. 25(6), 56–60 (in Ukrainian)
4. Erickson, D. L. & Fenster, C. B. (2006). Іntraspecific hybridization and the recovery of fitness in the native legume chamaecrista fasciculata. Evolution, issue 60(2), 225–233. https://doi.org/10.1554/05-020.1
5. Evin, A., Dobney, K. & Schafberg, R. (2015). Phenotype and animal domestication: A study of dental variation between domestic, wild, captive, hybrid and insular. Sus scrofa . BMC Evol Biol. 15, 6. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12862-014-0269-x
6. Fediaieva, A. S. (2019). Obgruntuvannia efektyvnoi systemy porodno-liniinoi hibrydyzatsii za vykorystannia terminalnykh knuriv [Substantiation of an effective system of breed-linear hybridization using terminal boars]. Thethis of PhD dissertation. Kharkiv (in Ukrainian).
7. Hallauer, A. R., Carena, M. J., Miranda Filho, J. D. (2010). Quantitative Genetics in Maize Breeding, Vol. 6. Berlin: Springer Science & Business Media. https://www.amazon.com/Quantitative-Genetics-Maize-Breeding-Handbook/ dp/1441907653
8. Herbst, R. H., Bar-Zvi, D., Reikhav, S., Soifer, I., Breker, M., Jona, G. (2017). Heterosis as a consequence of regulatory incompatibility. BMC Biol., 15, 38. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12915-017-0373-7
9. Holm, B. (2004). Genetic correlations between reproduction and production traits in swine. J. Anim. Sci., 2, 3458–3464. https://doi.org/10.2527/2004.82123458x 10. Holtkamp, D. J., Kliebenstein, J. B., Neumann, E. J, Zimmerman, J. J. & Rotto, H. F. (2013). Assessment of the economic impact of porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus on United States pork producers. J Swine Health Prod. 21, 72–84. https://www.aasv.org/shap/issues/v21n2/v21n2p72.pdf
11. Horbachova, N. O. (2002). Reproduktyvni yakosti svynomatok velykoi biloi porody pry riznykh poiednanniakh [Reproductive qualities of sows of large white breed in different combinations]. Visnyk PDAA. 5–6, 39–48 (in Ukrainian).
12. Hryshyna, L. P., Piddubna, A. M. & Rud, S. S. (2021). Vykorystannia svynei miasnykh porid vitchyznianoi selektsii u systemi hibrydyzatsii Ukrainy [The use of pigs of meat breeds of domestic selection in the hybridization system of Ukraine, Meat genotypes of pigs: present and future], Miasni henotypy svynei: sohodennia ta perspektyvy.: materialy Mizhnarodnoi naukovo-praktychnoi konferentsii naukovo-pedahohichnykh pratsivnykiv ta molodykh naukovtsiv [Proceedings of the International scientific-practical conference of scientific and pedagogical workers and young scientists], Odesa, 8–11 (in Ukrainian).
13. Khramkova, O. M. (2019). Vidtvoriuvalni yakosti svynomatok za riznykh poiednan porid i typiv [Reproductive qualities of sows in different combinations of breeds and types]. Theoretical and Applied Veterinary Medicine, 7(2), 115–119. (in Ukrainian). https://doi.org/ 10.32819/2019.71021
14. Kemp, B., Da Silva, C. & Soede, N. M. (2018). Recent advances in pig reproduction: Focus on impact of genetic selection for female fertility. Reproduction in domestic animals. 53(2), 28–36. https://doi.org/10.1111/rda.13264
15. Knecht, D., Srodon, S. & Duziński, K. (2015). Breed on selected reproductive performance parameters of sows. Arch. Anim. Breed, 58, 49–56. https://doi.org/10.5194/aab-58-49-2015, 2015.
16. Kramarenko, S. S., Luhovyi, S. I., & Lykhach, A. V. (2019). Analiz biometrychnykh danykh u rozvedenni ta selektsii tvaryn: navchalnyi posibnyk. Mykolaiv: MNAU, 211 p (in Ukrainian).
17. Kremez, M. I., Povod, M. G., Mykhalko, O. G., Susol, R. L., Trybrat, R. O., Onishenko, L. M., Kravchenko, O. O., Verbelchuk, T. V., & Sherbyna, O. V. (2022). Reproductive characteristics of pigs of Irish selection and manifestation of different forms of heterosis by different methods of breeding in modern conditions of industrial pork production. Scientific Messenger of Lviv National University of Veterinary Medicine and Biotechnologies. Series: Agricultural sciences, 24(96), 78–88 (in Ukrainian). https://doi.org/ 10.32718/nvlvet-a9610
18. Krupa, E. & Wolf, J. (2013). Simultaneous estimation of genetic parameters for production and litter size traits in Czech Large White and Czech Landrace pigs. Czech J. Anim. Sci., 58(9), 429–436. https://www.agriculturejournals.cz/ publicFiles/99612.pdf
19. Lisnyi, V. A. (1997). Otrymannia bahatorazovoho heterozysa v svynarstvi [Obtaining multiple heterosis in pig farming]. Tavriiskyi naukovyi visnyk. 2, 79–83 (in Ukrainian).
20. Mykhailov, N. V. (2012). Svynovodstvo: perspektyvy otrasly y problem [Pig breeding: industry prospects and problems]. Perspektyvnoe svynovodstvo: Teoryia y praktyka [Promising pig breeding: Theory and practice]. 2, 1–4 (in Ukrainian).
21. Mykhalko, O. H. & Povod M. H. (2019). Vidtvoriuvalni yakosti svynomatok danskoho ta frantsuzkoho pokhodzhennia v umovakh promyslovoho kompleksu [Reproductive qualities of sows of Danish and French origin in the conditions of an industrial complex]. Visnyk Sumskoho natsionalnoho ahrarnoho universytetu. Seriia: Tvarynnytstvo. 1-2(36-37), 15–25 (in Ukrainian).
22. Mykhalko, O. H., Povod, M. H. & Andriichuk, V. F. (2021). Vplyv metodiv rozvedennia ta viku svynomatok danskoi selektsii na yikh produktyvnist [Influence of breeding methods and age of Danish sows on their productivity]. NTB IT NAAN [NTB IT NAAN], 125, 161–179 (in Ukrainian).
23. Nikitchenko, I. N., Nikitenko, R. N. & Gorin, V. V. (1991). Programma gibridizatsii v svinovodstve Belorussii na osnove selektsionno-gibridnykh tsentrov. Povysheniye effektivnosti svinovodstva [Hybridization program in pig breeding in Belarus based on hybrid breeding centers. Improving the efficiency of pig breeding]. Moscow. Agroizdat (in Russian).
24. Shull, G. H. (1910). Hybridization methods in corn breeding. Amer. Breeding Magazine. 1, 98–107. https://doi. org/10.1093/jhered/1.2.98
25. Nwakpu, P. E. & Ugwu, S. O. C. (2009). Heterosis for litter traits in native by exotic inbred pig crosses. Journal of Tropical Agriculture, Food, Environment and Extension, 8(1), pp. 31–37. https://doi.org/10.4314/as.v8i1.44111
26. Ohloblia, V. V. & Povod, M. H. (2020). Vidtvoriuvalni yakosti svynomatok irlandskoho pokhodzhennia za chystoporodnoho rozvedennia ta skhreshchuvannia v umovakh promyslovoho kompleksu. Visnyk Sumskoho natsionalnoho ahrarnoho universytetu. Seriia «Tvarynnytstvo». 1 (40), 103–107. https://doi.org/10.32845/bsnau.lvst.2020.1.15
27. Onyshchenko, A. O. (2013). Promyslove skhreshchuvannia i hibrydyzatsiia, yikh efektyvnist u svynarstvi [Industrial crossbreeding and hybridization, their effectiveness in pig breeding]. Pig breeding. 62, 72–76 (in Ukrainian).
28. Shcherban, T. V. (2014). Reproduktyvni yakosti svynomatok myrhorodskoi porody za skhreshchuvannia z knuramy miasnoho napriamu produktyvnosti. Visnyk Poltavskoi derzhavnoi ahrarnoi akademii. 1, 125–129 (in Ukrainian). http:// journals.pdaa.edu.ua/visnyk/article/download/843/1115/
29. Suslyna, E. N. & Novykov, A. A. (2011). Metodycheskye aspekty povyshenyia effektyvnosty hybrydyzatsyy v svynovodstve [Methodological aspects of improving the efficiency of hybridization in pig breeding]. Svynovodstvo, 4, 12–15 (in Ukrainian).
30. Tomin, Y. F. (2007). Vidtvorni yakosti svynomatok velykoi biloi porody za riznykh metodiv rozvedennia [Reproductive qualities of sows of large white breed by different breeding methods]. Naukovi dopovidi NAU [Scientific reports of NAU], 2(7). [Elektronnyi resurs] (in Ukrainian). Rezhym dostupu: http://www.nbuv.gov.ua/e-Journals/nd/2007-2/07tyfmoc.pdf
31. Ushakova, S. V. (2021). Pokaznyky vidtvoriuvalnoi zdatnosti u bahatoporodnomu skhreshchuvanni svynei [Indicators of reproductive ability in multi-breed crossbreeding of pigs]. Zbirnyk materialiv 75-i Vseukrainskoi naukovopraktychnoi konferentsii. Kyiv: NUBiP, Ukraine, 91–92 (in Ukrainian).
32. Van, V. T. K. & Due N. V. (1999). Heritabilities, genetic and phenotypic correlations between reproductive performance in Mong Ca1 and Large White breeds. Proc. Assoc. Advmt/Anim. Breed. Genet. 13, 153–156.
33. Xu, Y., Li, P., Zou, C., Lu, Y., Xie, C., & Zhang, X. (2017). Enhancing genetic gain in the era of molecular breeding. J. Exp. Bot. 68, 2641–2666. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erx135
Published
2022-07-11
How to Cite
Kremez, M. I., Povod, M. H., Mykhalko, O. H., Trybrat, R. O., Kalinichenko, H. I., Onyshchenko, L. M., Kravchenko, O. O., & Karatieieva, O. I. (2022). RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE REPRODUCTIVE QUALITIES OF SOWS AND THE POWER OF INFLUENCE ON THE BREED AND METHOD OF BREEDING. Bulletin of Sumy National Agrarian University. The Series: Livestock, (1), 31-39. https://doi.org/10.32845/bsnau.lvst.2022.1.5
Section
Articles
ISSN 
ISSN 
