ANALYSIS OF THE EFFICIENCY OF WORK OF THE EQUIPMENT FOR THE MANUFACTURE OF CONSTRUCTION SOLUTIONS ON THE BASIS OF CONTROLLING THE QUALITY INDICATORS OF THE OUTPUT PRODUCT
Abstract
The article evaluates the influence of technological factors on the final properties of solutions and studies the main parameters of construction mortar: consistency, strength, uniformity of mixing, which allows to increase the efficiency of production processes. The research is aimed at increasing the load capacity of finished products, ensuring the durability of products made on the basis of construction solutions. In modern construction production, such a material as aerated concrete is widely used, products from which are used for the construction of residential and industrial buildings up to four stories high. Testing the strength of aerated concrete is performed by key methods depending on the required characteristics (compressive strength, bending strength, etc.) The materials of the research are standard construction mortars produced on the equipment developed during the preparation of the dissertation. The technological processes of manufacturing mortars, loading speed, and humidity have a significant influence on the value of the strength limit of concrete. Strength is affected by the compaction factor of the concrete mixture, the production technology, and the quality of the components used. When designing a future building, many factors are taken into account, but the strength of concrete will always be the main characteristic, thereby determining the maximum load that this building material is capable of. As the substances that make up water and cement interact, the strength of concrete can increase. Each concrete has its own strength coefficients. It was established that the efficiency of the equipment significantly affects the stability and compliance of construction mortars with regulatory requirements. The relationship between the technological parameters of mixing plants and the quality of the finished product was studied. The role of automated systems in improving the accuracy of dosing of components, which contributes to the reduction of errors in the formulation, is evaluated. Prospective directions for optimizing the production process to increase productivity, reduce costs, and improve quality control are outlined. Recommendations for the introduction of modern technologies to increase the energy efficiency of equipment and minimize the influence of the human factor on the final result are offered. The obtained results can be useful for enterprises in the construction industry striving to increase the competitiveness of products and reduce production losses. The application of quality control methods at each stage of the production process will allow not only to ensure the compliance of construction mortars with the established standards, but also to increase their durability and operational characteristics in real conditions of use. The purpose of the study is to analyze the efficiency of the equipment based on the control of the quality indicators of the original product.
References
2. Ashtiani M. S., Scott A. N., Dhakal R. P. (2013). Mechanical and fresh properties of high-strength selfcompacting concrete containing class C fly ash. Construction and Building Materials, 47, 1217–1224.
3. Aіtcin, P. C. (1998). High performance concrete. CRC press, London and New York, 624 p.
4. Aіtcin, P. C. (2003). The durability characteristics of high performance concrete: a review. Cement and concrete composites, 25(4-5), 409–420.
5. Bilodeau A., Malhotra V. M. (2000). High-volume fly ash system: concrete solution for sustainable development. ACI Mater Journal, 97, 41–48.
6. Bindiganavile V., Banthia N., Aarup B. (2002). Impact response of ultra-high-strength fiber-reinforced cement composite. ACI Materials Journal, 99(6), 543–548.
7. Boel V., Helincks P., Desnerck P., Schutter G. D. (2010). Bond behavior and shear capacity of self compacting concrete. Design, production and placement of Self-Consolidating Concrete, 1, 343–353.
8. Desai A. T., Kumbhar M. G., Deokar R. H., Mandhare A. M. (2018). Design and Analysis of Powder Mixing Ribbon Blender. Journal of Mechanical and Civil Engineering, 1, 39–43.
9. DSTU B V.2.7-137:2008. Budivelni materialy. Bloky iz nizdriuvatogo betonu stinovi dribni. Tekhnichni umovy (41007). [Building materials. small-sized wall blocks made of cellular concrete. technical specifications (41007)]. Minrehionbud Ukrainy, Kyiv (in Ukrainian).
10. DSTU B V.2.7-214:2009. Budivelni materialy. Betony. Metody vyznachennia mitsnosti za kontrolnymy zrazkamy. [Building materials. Concretes. Methods for determining strength from control samples]. Minrehionbud Ukrainy, Kyiv (in Ukrainian).
11. DSTU B V.2.7-220:2009. Budivelni materialy. Vyznachennia mitsnosti mekhanichnymy metodamy neruiynovoho kontroliu. [Building materials. Determination of strength by non-destructive mechanical methods]. Minrehionbud Ukrainy, Kyiv (in Ukrainian).
12. DSTU B V.2.7-224:2009. Betony. Pravyla kontroliu mitsnosti. [Concretes. Strength control rules]. Minrehionbud Ukrainy, Kyiv (in Ukrainian).
13. DSTU B V.2.7-45:2010. Betony nizdriuvati. Zahalni tekhnichni umovy. [Cellular concretes. General technical specifications]. Minrehionbud Ukrainy, Kyiv (in Ukrainian).
14. Dvorkin L. Y., Hots V. I., Dvorkin O. L. (2014). Vyprobuvannia betoniv i budivelnykh rozchyniv. Proektuvannia yikh skladiv. [Testing of concretes and building mortars. Design of their components]. Osnova, Kyiv, 304 p. (in Ukrainian).
15. Hots V. I. (2019). Vyrobnytstvo zalizobetonnykh konstruktsii i vyrobiv. [Production of reinforced concrete structures and products]. Osnova, Kyiv, 464 p. (in Ukrainian).
16. Korobko B. O., Vasyliiev O. S., Rohozin I. A. (2015). Analiz kinematyky sumishi v korpusi zmishuvacha z vertykalnym shnekom zi zminnoiu tvornoiu. [Analysis of mixture kinematics in the mixer housing with a vertical auger of variable generating line]. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 3(7), 48–52 (in Ukrainian).
17. Kryvenko P. V., Pushkarova K. K., Baranovskyi V. B., Kochevykh M. O., Hasan Yu. H., Konstantynivskyi B. Ya., Raksha V. O. (2012). Budivelne materiali︠oznavstvo. [Construction materials science]. Lira-K, Kyiv, 624 p. (in Ukrainian).
18. Mosspan V. I. (2011). Pidvyshchennia stiikosti pinobetonnoi sumishi. [Enhancing the stability of foam concrete mixture]. Visnyk PSACEA, 1–2, 73–76 (in Ukrainian).
19. Onyshchenko O. H., Onyshchenko V. O., Lytvynenko S. L., Korobko B. O. (2017). Budivelna tekhnika. [Construction equipment]. Kondor-Vydavnytstvo, Kyiv, 426 p. (in Ukrainian).
20. Runova R. F., Dvorkin L. Y., Dvorkin O. L., Nosovskyi Yu. L. (2012). V’iazuchi rechovyny. [Binding substances]. Osnova, Kyiv, 448 p. (in Ukrainian).
21. Runova R. F., Hots V. I., Helevera O. H., Konstantynovskyi O. P., Nosovskyi Yu. L., Pipa V. V. (2017). Osnovy vyrobnytstva stinovykh ta ozdobliuvalnykh materialiv. [Basics of production of wall and finishing materials]. Osnova, Kyiv, 528 p. (in Ukrainian).
22. Sivko V. Y., Polyachenko V. A. (2004). Obladnannia pidpryiemstv promyslovosti budivelnykh materialiv i vyrobiv. [Equipment of enterprises in the construction materials and products industry]. LLC “AVEGA”, Kyiv, 276 p. (in Ukrainian).
23. Usherov-Marshak O. V., Hots V. I., Kabus O. V. (2022). Betony ta budivelni rozchyny. [Concretes and building mortars]. Osnova, Kyiv, 93 p. (in Ukrainian).
ISSN 
ISSN 
