COMPOSITE MILLING HEADS FOR MACHINING LARGE FLAT SURFACES
Abstract
The article deals with the problems of increasing the productivity of milling the planes of workpieces with large dimensions. Such workpieces include the frames of centrifuges and metal-cutting machines, tables of paper-cutting machines, various plates and cases, frames, and parts of transport equipment. The dimensions of the planes of these parts usually exceed tens of centimeters and often reach meter values, which creates certain difficulties during machining. Since milling is one of the most efficient methods of machining, there is a problem of reducing the milling time of large workpieces. In this case, one-pass milling of planes with one cutter cannot always be implemented, since this requires a face mill of very large values: with a diameter of 400–630 mm and more. Multi-pass milling is often used, which reduces the quality of the surface and leads to an increase in machining time. Therefore, one of the options is the use of composite milling heads (CMH), which have their own drive and contain several face mills. For example, if the machining of mutually perpendicular flat surfaces is required, then an CMH containing four spindles with face mills installed on them is proposed. Each pair of adjacent cutters has trajectories of cutting knives that intersect. Such CMH allow obtaining a continuous machined surface with relative movement of the workpiece and the machine table. The maximum milling width of the CMH is almost twice the diameter of the face mill. CMH can work in any direction of longitudinal and transverse feed. The proposed CMH expands the technological capabilities of milling, as it allows the machining of large flat surfaces in mutually perpendicular directions. If there is a need to adjust the width of milling with the use of CMH (for example, when machining the planes of grooves with side walls), then the design of CMH with a rotating spindle block is proposed. In this CMH, three face mills are arranged in a row and are able to rotate together with the spindle block at a given angle α, thereby changing the milling width. The size of the milling width can vary from a maximum value equal to approximately the sum of the diameters of three cutters to a minimum value equal to one diameter of the cutter. The research determined the dependence of the milling width on the angle of rotation α (0°–360°) of the CMH spindle block, which contains three milling cutters with a diameter of Dfr = 315 mm. The proposed CMHs provide a reduction in the machining time of milling large flat surfaces by reducing the number of tool passes. A comparison of the normalization parameters of milling operations of the «OGSH»-type centrifuge bed fully confirms the advantage of using an CMH compared to a conventional face mill.
References
2. Borysenko, D., Karpuschewski, B., Welzel, F., Kundrak, J., & Felho, C. (2019). Influence of cutting ratio and tool macro geometry on process characteristics and workpiece conditions in face milling. CIRP Journal of Manufacturing Science and Technology, 24, 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cirpj.2018.12.003
3. Cisar, M., Kuric, I., Cubonova, N., & Kandera, M. (2017). Design of the clamping system for the CNC machine tool. MATEC Web of Conferences, 137(1): 01003. https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/201713701003
4. Gelatko, M., Kushnirov, P., Dehtiarov, I., Evtuhov, A., Stupin, B., Neshta, A., & Ostapenko, B. (2023). Milling Heads for Machining Mutually Perpendicular Flat Surfaces. MM Science Journal, 6441–6445. https://doi.org/10.17973/MMSJ.2023_06_2023008
5. Hadad, M., & Ramezani, M. (2016). Modeling and analysis of a novel approach in machining and structuring of flat surfaces using face milling process. Int. J. Mach. Tools Manuf., 05, 32–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2016.03.005
6. Ivchenko, O. V., Kushnirov, P. V., Denysenko, Yu. O., Dehtiarov, I. M., Yevtukhov, A. V., Stupin, B. A., Panchenko, V. O., Meleichuk, S. S., Kulyk, V. V., Denysov, R. V., Riasna, O. V., Dynnyk, O. D., Fesenko, D. I., Dumenko, O. P., & Ostapenko, B. A. (2022). Ahrehatna frezerna holovka z rehulovanoiu shyrynoiu obrobky [Aggregate milling head with adjustable machining width] (Patent of Ukraine No. 151784) (in Ukrainian)
7. Józwik, J., Kuric, I., Grozav, S., & Ceclan, V. (2014). Diagnostics of CNC machine tool with R–test system. Academic Journal of Manufacturing Engineering, 12(1), 52–57.
8. Kushnirov, P., & Stupin, B. (2017). Applying of several face mills in composite milling heads. Modern engineering and innovative technologies, 1(2), 16–21. https://doi.org/10.21893/2567-5273.2017-02-01-025
9. Kushnirov, P., Denysenko, Y., Ostapenko, B., Zhyhylii, D., & Stupin, B. (2022). Improvement of the Milling Effectiveness by Application of Composite Milling Heads. Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering. Springer, Cham, 293–301. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-06025-0_29
10. Kushnirov, P., Zhyhylii, D., Ivchenko, O., Yevtukhov, A., & Dynnyk, O. (2020). Investigation of the dynamic state of adjustable milling heads. Advances in Design, Simulation and Manufacturing II. DSMIE–2019. Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering, 169–179. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-22365-6_17
11. Loiev, V. Yu., & Kravchuk, O. M. (2009). Tortseve frezeruvannia shyrokykh ploskykh poverkhon nezhorstkykh detalei. Suchasnyi stan problemy [Face milling of wide flat surfaces of non-rigid parts. The current state of the problem]. Bulletin of the Zhytomyr State University of Technology, (7), 114–129 (in Ukrainian)
12. Ostapenko, B. A., Skabenok, M. M., & Kushnirov, P. V. (2022). Ahrehatni frezerni holovky z troma tortsevymy frezamy [Composite milling heads with three face mills]. In: Technologies of the 21st century. SNAU, 23 (in Ukrainian)
13. Pavlova, O. O., Hryhorash, O. V., Kushnirov, P. V., Marchuk, N. A., Nedilska, S. A., & Sirenko, V. A. (2022). Evoliutsiia konstruktsii ahrehatnykh frezernykh holovok dlia obrobky shyrokykh ploskykh poverkhon [Evolution of designs of composite milling heads for machining wide flat surfaces] (P. V. Kushnirov). In: Innovative science, education, production and transport: education, medicine, economics, technology. Book 21. Part 2. KUPRIIeNKO SV, Odesa, 86–96. https://doi.org/10.30888/2663-5569.2022-21-02-004 (in Ukrainian)
14. Perez, I., Madariaga, A., Cuesta, M., Garay, A., Arrazola, P., Ruiz, J., Rubio, F., & Sanchez, R. (2018). Effect of cutting speed on the surface integrity of face milled 7050–T7451 aluminium workpieces. Procedia CIRP, 71(1), 460–465. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2018.05.034
15. Pimenov, D., Guzeev, V., Krolczyk, G., Mia, M., & Wojciechowski, S. (2018). Modeling flatness deviation in face milling considering angular movement of the machine tool system components and tool flank wear. Precision Engineering, 54, 327–337. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.precisioneng.2018.07.001
16. Ramakrishnan, S., & Wysk, R. (2002). Optimization of the length of travel in face milling operations for flat surfaces. Transactions of The North American Manufacturing Research Institute of SME, XXX, 431–438.
17. Sandvik Coromant (2021). Cutter Path and Chip Formation in Milling. https://www.sandvik.coromant.com/en-gb/knowledge/milling/pages/cutter-path-and-chip-formation.aspx
18. Stupin, B. A., Ostapenko, B. A., & Kushnirov, P. V. (2022). Ahrehatni frezerni holovky dlia obroblennia ploskykh poverkhon, shcho ye vzaiemno perpendykuliarnymy [Composite milling heads for machining flat surfaces that are mutually perpendicular]. In: Modern technologies in industrial production. Sumy State University, 34 (in Ukrainian)
19. Taurit, H., Pukhovskyi, Ye., & Hryshchenko, Ye. (1981). Obrobka velykohabarytnykh detalei [Machining of Large–Sized Parts]. Tekhnika, Kyiv, 207 (in Ukrainian)
20. Yin, Y., Du, S., Shao, Y., Wang, K., & Xi, L. (2021). Sealing analysis of facemilled surfaces based on high definition metrology. Precision Engineering, 73(1), 23–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.precisioneng.2021.08.020