DEVELOPMENT OF BIOPHILIC DESIGN AS A METHOD OF INTEGRATING NATURE INTO URBAN PLANNING
Abstract
The process of urbanization presents significant challenges for human comfort and ecological stability, and the lack of connection with nature leads to numerous negative consequences for the physical and mental health of the population. In turn, biophilic design emerges as a promising approach to integrating natural elements into the urban environment, fostering symbiotic relationships between humans and nature. This article examines the development of biophilic design as a method to improve urban planning by incorporating natural elements. The relevance of this research lies in addressing the need for developing sustainable development strategies for cities that prioritize the well-being of people and ecological balance. By applying biophilic principles, urban planners and architects can create environments that enhance the sense of connection with nature, thereby improving overall quality of life and mitigating the negative consequences of urbanization. The purpose of this article is to investigate the development of biophilic design principles and their application in the context of urban planning. Through a comprehensive review of literature and specific case studies, the article highlights various strategies and methods used in biophilic design to integrate nature into urban spaces. It also evaluates the effectiveness of these approaches in achieving stated goals, including enhancing aesthetics, air and water quality, reducing stress, and promoting biodiversity. The findings indicate that biophilic design offers numerous benefits for urban environments, including increased biodiversity, improved health and well-being of people, enhanced social cohesion, and increased resilience to climate change. At the same time, the integration of biophilic elements into urban planning has shown positive economic impacts by increasing property values and attracting investments. These results suggest that biophilic design holds immense potential as a holistic approach to urban planning, aligning human needs with ecological imperatives. However, further research is needed to examine the long-term effects of biophilic interventions on urban ecosystems and to develop standardized metrics for assessing their effectiveness. Future research should explore the scalability of biophilic design principles across different urban contexts and cultural circumstances, as well as their compatibility with other sustainable development strategies.
References
2. Andreucci, M. B., Loder, A., Brown, M., & Brajković, J. (2021). Exploring challenges and opportunities of biophilic urban design: Evidence from research and experimentation. Sustainability, 13 (8), doi:10.3390/su13084323
3. Barbiero, G., & Berto, R. (2021). Biophilia as evolutionary adaptation: An onto-and phylogenetic framework for biophilic design. Frontiers in psychology, 12, doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2021.700709
4. Beatley, T. (2020). Biophilic cities. Sustainable Built Environments, 275-292. doi:10.1007/978-1-4939-2493-6_1033-2
5. Elmashharawi A. (2019). Biophilic design for bringing educational spaces to life. Journal of Design Studio, 1 (1), 16–21.
6. Gaekwad, J. S., Sal Moslehian, A., Roös, P. B., & Walker, A. (2022). A meta-analysis of emotional evidence for the biophilia hypothesis and implications for biophilic design. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2022.750245
7. Ghaziani, R., Lemon, M., & Atmodiwirjo, P. (2021). Biophilic design patterns for primary schools. Sustainability, 13 (21). doi:10.3390/su132112207
8. Hady, S. I. M. A. (2021). Activating biophilic design patterns as a sustainable landscape approach. Journal of Engineering and Applied Science, 68 (1), 46. doi:10.1186/s44147-021-00031-x
9. Hähn, N., Essah, E., & Blanusa, T. (2021). Biophilic design and office planting: a case study of effects on perceived health, well-being and performance metrics in the workplace. Intelligent Buildings International, 13 (4), 241-260. doi: 10.1080/17508975.2020.1732859
10. Hung, S. H., & Chang, C. Y. (2021). Health benefits of evidence-based biophilic-designed environments: A review. Journal of People, Plants, and Environment, 24 (1), 1-16. doi: 10.11628/ksppe.2021.24.1.1
11. Lee, H. C., & Park, S. J. (2018). Assessment of importance and characteristics of biophilic design patterns in a children’s library. Sustainability, 10 (4), doi:10.3390/su10040987
12. Lee, S. H. (2019). Effects of biophilic design on consumer responses in the lodging industry. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 83, 141-150. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhm.2019.05.006
13. Lei, Q., Lau, S. S. Y., Yuan, C., & Qi, Y. (2022). Post-occupancy evaluation of the biophilic design in the workplace for health and wellbeing. Buildings, 12 (4). doi:10.3390/buildings12040417
14. Lei, Q., Yuan, C., & Lau, S. S. Y. (2021). A quantitative study for indoor workplace biophilic design to improve health and productivity performance. Journal of Cleaner Production, 324, doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.129168
15. McGee, B., & Park, N. K. (2022). Colour, light, and materiality: biophilic interior design presence in research and practice. Interiority, 5 (1), 27-52. doi: 10.7454/in.v5i1.189
16. Mollazadeh, M., & Zhu, Y. (2021). Application of virtual environments for biophilic design: a critical review. Buildings, 11 (4), 148. doi:10.3390/buildings11040148
17. Park, S. J., & Lee, H. C. (2019). Spatial design of childcare facilities based on biophilic design patterns. Sustainability, 11(10), doi:10.3390/su11102851
18. Parsaee, M., Demers, C. M., Hébert, M., Lalonde, J. F., & Potvin, A. (2019). A photobiological approach to biophilic design in extreme climates. Building and Environment, 154, 211-226. doi: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2019.03.027
19. Peters, T., & D’Penna, K. (2020). Biophilic design for restorative university learning environments: A critical review of literature and design recommendations. Sustainability, 12 (17). doi:10.3390/su12177064
20. Peters, T., & Verderber, S. (2022). Biophilic design strategies in long-term residential care environments for persons with dementia. Journal of aging and environment, 36 (3), 227-255. doi: 10.1080/26892618.2021.1918815
21. Richardson, M., & Butler, C. W. (2022). Nature connectedness and biophilic design. Building Research & Information, 50 (1-2), 36-42. doi: 10.1080/09613218.2021.2006594
22. Ryan, C. O., & Browning, W. D. (2020). Biophilic design. Sustainable built environments, 43-85. doi:10.1007/978-1-4939-2493-6_1034-1
23. Sanchez, J. A., Ikaga, T., & Sanchez, S. V. (2018). Quantitative improvement in workplace performance through biophilic design: A pilot experiment case study. Energy and Buildings, 177, 316-328. doi: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2018.07.065
24. Tekin, B. H., & Urbano Gutiérrez, R. (2023). Human-centred health-care environments: a new framework for biophilic design. Frontiers in Medical Technology, 5, doi:10.3389/fmedt.2023.1219897
25. Tekin, B. H., Corcoran, R., & Gutiérrez, R. U. (2023). A systematic review and conceptual framework of biophilic design parameters in clinical environments. HERD: Health Environments Research & Design Journal, 16 (1), 233-250. doi: 10.1177/19375867221118675
26. Totaforti, S. (2018). Applying the benefits of biophilic theory to hospital design. City, Territory and Architecture, 5, 1-9. doi: 10.1186/s40410-018-0077-5
27. Wijesooriya, N., & Brambilla, A. (2021). Bridging biophilic design and environmentally sustainable design: A critical review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 283, doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.124591
28. Xue, F., Gou, Z., Lau, S. S. Y., Lau, S. K., Chung, K. H., & Zhang, J. (2019). From biophilic design to biophilic urbanism: Stakeholders’ perspectives. Journal of Cleaner Production, 211, 1444-1452. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.11.277
29. Yassein, G., & Ebrahiem, S. (2018). Biophilic design in the built environment to improve well-being: a systematic review of practices. Journal of Urban Research, 30 (1), 128-146. doi: 10.21608/jur.2018.88412
30. Zare, G., Faizi, M., Baharvand, M., & Masnavi, M. (2021). A review of biophilic design conception implementation in architecture. Journal of Design and Built Environment, 21 (3), 16-36. doi: 22452/jdbe.vol21no3.2
31. Zhong, W., Schröder, T., & Bekkering, J. (2022). Biophilic design in architecture and its contributions to health, wellbeing, and sustainability: A critical review. Frontiers of Architectural Research, 11(1), 114-141. doi: 10.1016/j.foar.2021.07.006